If I do the maths from the actual engine range and I remove 2 cylinders I take te same power ratio, I get theese numbers:
1804 cc from 175 to 185 hp (not likely) 1804 cc turbo up to 245 hp 2291 cc from 210 to 215 hp (not likely) 2291 cc turbo up to 335 hp 2533 cc up to 265 hp 2533 cc turbo from 345 to 375 hp
I made my calculation based on power to cc ratio of the existing engines. The 911S engine makes 560. 560 x 4/6 = 373 not 395 Reporters write what they want because they have no information about this engine at all.
Posted by: JmuRiz Aug 1 2014, 12:26 PM
QUOTE(ThePaintedMan @ Aug 1 2014, 07:58 AM)
turboed-4!
Sounds cool! Kind of similar to a Suby.
Yep, sounds like a wrx engine....nice. So many rumors, I wonder what they are actually working on for this engine and the possible GT4 (same car?)
Posted by: Kansas 914 Aug 1 2014, 12:45 PM
QUOTE(johannes @ Aug 1 2014, 12:18 PM)
I made my calculation based on power to cc ratio of the existing engines. The 911S engine makes 560. 560 x 4/6 = 373 not 395 Reporters write what they want because they have no information about this engine at all.
Posted by: johannes Aug 1 2014, 02:03 PM
THis will make an owsome upgrade for 914 in 10-15 years ...
Posted by: 914_teener Aug 1 2014, 04:59 PM
QUOTE(johannes @ Aug 1 2014, 01:03 PM)
THis will make an owsome upgrade for 914 in 10-15 years ...
My thoughts exactly!
Posted by: Elliot Cannon Aug 1 2014, 05:03 PM
It doesn't matter how efficient that motor might be, I doubt very much if people will want that engine in a 911. Cayman and Boxter maybe but who wants a 4cyl 911?
Posted by: 914_teener Aug 1 2014, 05:44 PM
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Aug 1 2014, 04:03 PM)
It doesn't matter how efficient that motor might be, I doubt very much if people will want that engine in a 911. Cayman and Boxter maybe but who wants a 4cyl 911?
Think they are thinking about 10 years from now Elliot.....If I read this right, emission cuts by law for the EU are difficult to make.
I don't know if Porsche are exempt from these in the US market though.
Posted by: johannes Aug 2 2014, 08:40 AM
They need to have 4 cylinder engines in their range to comply with the new regulation. It may not sell very well but it is mandatory to lower average co2 on the range. "The fleet average to be achieved by all new cars is 130 grams of CO2 per kilometre (g/km) by 2015 – with the target phased in from 2012 - and 95g/km by 2021, phased in from 2020". This is also why they put a lot of hybrid models in their range. Hybridation also allows smaller and lighter petrol engines
Posted by: mgp4591 Aug 2 2014, 08:52 AM
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Aug 1 2014, 05:03 PM)
It doesn't matter how efficient that motor might be, I doubt very much if people will want that engine in a 911. Cayman and Boxter maybe but who wants a 4cyl 911?
Isn't that called a 912?
Posted by: johannes Aug 3 2014, 01:34 AM
Yes it was called a 912... will the new Cayman with four banger be called a 914 ? ... no
Posted by: mgp4591 Aug 3 2014, 02:47 AM
QUOTE(johannes @ Aug 3 2014, 01:34 AM)
Yes it was called a 912... will the new Cayman with four banger be called a 914 ? ... no
How about a K914?!
Posted by: Brett W Aug 3 2014, 09:21 AM
Unless Porsche purposely developed an unequal length exhaust, that doesn't sound like a four cylinder. The only reason a Suby sounds like a Suby is the weird exhaust port configuration. If you build an equal length header it still sounds like a regular four cylinder. Even Subaru has changed the new engines to a more equal length exhaust port and header configuration. They do not sound like the old engines.
I question the four cylinder observation. That sounds more like a V8 of some variety. It revs too slow to be a four cylinder and it has that much deeper tone of a V8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ywFMCkDdG8
Posted by: johannes Aug 3 2014, 11:16 AM
QUOTE(Brett W @ Aug 3 2014, 07:21 AM)
Unless Porsche purposely developed an unequal length exhaust, that doesn't sound like a four cylinder. The only reason a Suby sounds like a Suby is the weird exhaust port configuration. If you build an equal length header it still sounds like a regular four cylinder. Even Subaru has changed the new engines to a more equal length exhaust port and header configuration. They do not sound like the old engines.
I question the four cylinder observation. That sounds more like a V8 of some variety. It revs too slow to be a four cylinder and it has that much deeper tone of a V8.
Yes it was called a 912... will the new Cayman with four banger be called a 914 ? ... no
914E
Posted by: Brett W Aug 4 2014, 10:12 PM
Could be some testing for this engine: http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2014/07/porsche-developing-ferrari-hunter-with-600hp-flat-eight/#more-862113
Posted by: Andyrew Aug 5 2014, 12:03 AM
QUOTE(johannes @ Aug 1 2014, 09:28 AM)
If I do the maths from the actual engine range and I remove 2 cylinders I take te same power ratio, I get theese numbers:
1804 cc from 175 to 185 hp (not likely) 1804 cc turbo up to 245 hp 2291 cc from 210 to 215 hp (not likely) 2291 cc turbo up to 335 hp 2533 cc up to 265 hp 2533 cc turbo from 345 to 375 hp
With DI and the new turbo technologies you can add about 25-50% to all of those numbers.
That being said.. That doesnt sound like anything i've heard under 2L. That engine has some displacement..
Posted by: Philip W. Aug 5 2014, 09:40 PM
This motor is being developed for a new roadster that will be entry level car below the boxster. In about 3 years. And it will help them meet the emissions standards etc as mentioned. Some of the leaked mock ups put it in the realm of a 914 type vehicle and I think the price point is somewhere in the $40k range.
Posted by: scotty b Aug 5 2014, 09:43 PM
Boxter and Cayman fill the mid-engined catagory nicely. This needs to be in the all new 2016 Porsche 356
Posted by: r_towle Aug 6 2014, 08:45 AM
QUOTE(johannes @ Aug 2 2014, 10:40 AM)
They need to have 4 cylinder engines in their range to comply with the new regulation. It may not sell very well but it is mandatory to lower average co2 on the range. "The fleet average to be achieved by all new cars is 130 grams of CO2 per kilometre (g/km) by 2015 – with the target phased in from 2012 - and 95g/km by 2021, phased in from 2020". This is also why they put a lot of hybrid models in their range. Hybridation also allows smaller and lighter petrol engines
the rules changed when VW bought them.
Its the whole fleet now, and VW can do alot to ensure they comply....without having to touch Porsche.
The Diesel and hybrids are because the Cayanne gets lousy gas mileage.
Posted by: johannes Aug 6 2014, 09:16 AM
130g average in 2015 is impossible for Porsche alone. All cars are above 160 except the hybrid cars that are at 70g ... and everyone knows this is just a big joke because mesured on very short distances.