Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format
914World.com _ 914World Garage _ New GB CHT probe NLA closes Oct 29th- if you have the code use today
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 17 2016, 01:17 AM
Got tired of looking for these some have them listed at $75 and 90, but no Who's interested? I know I need one soon!
Attached image(s)
Posted by: 914Next Sep 17 2016, 01:46 AM
Got tired of looking for these some have them listed at $75 and 90, but no stock.
Not a particularly hard part to make, so Who's interested? I know I need one soon!
Count me in!
Posted by: Tom_T Sep 17 2016, 06:57 AM
Hey Mark,
I know that they needed to be the correct part number CHT for each MY & engine in order to work properly - i.e.: -037 for the `73 2.0, -043 for the `74 2.0 (maybe 75 & 76 GC 2.0 too??), etc.?
So will you be making them in the various "flavors" to match to the EFI systems in the different MYs & engines of the 914s, as did Bosch?
Tom
///////
Posted by: jim_hoyland Sep 17 2016, 08:04 AM
Great! Gonna be ok for thT 1.8L L-Jet ?
Posted by: hndyhrr Sep 17 2016, 08:25 AM
me also, if for 70 1.7
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 17 2016, 10:03 AM
Well I have the spec for the 012, so I can make it work. I'm not sure the variations on the others, is it size or resistance? Anyone know for sure?
Posted by: Dave_Darling Sep 17 2016, 10:27 AM
They're physically the same, the only difference is the resistance/temperature curve. I think Brad Anders has some graphs on his website.
--DD
Posted by: Marty Yeoman Sep 17 2016, 11:19 AM
Mark,
MCMark had an alternative design he worked out for these. It is supposed to be a more modern construction alternative. You may want to contact him regarding it before you dive into production.
Marty
Posted by: Tom_T Sep 17 2016, 02:23 PM
They're physically the same, the only difference is the resistance/temperature curve. I think Brad Anders has some graphs on his website.
--DD
IIRC it is those + the reaction time is slower on the -037 with the factory in-line resistor, but the ECU, MPS, etc. are all set up to work together correctly, while mixing components generally leads to running problems.
Probably Brad Mayeur or Brad Anders can explain the details better than I!
Tom
///////
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 17 2016, 04:16 PM
Mark,
MCMark had an alternative design he worked out for these. It is supposed to be a more modern construction alternative. You may want to contact him regarding it before you dive into production.
Marty
I'll check in with him too to see what he's got, thanks,
mark
Posted by: Dave_Darling Sep 17 2016, 10:51 PM
I was mis-remembering the CHT sensor info. What I found on Brad Anders' site is the following:
Sensor Temp = 39 deg. F
(ice bath with thermometer) Temp = 61 deg. F
(room temperature)
Temp = 210 deg F
(boiling water at 1000 feet altitude)
0 280 130 003 6.10 K ohms 2.94 K ohms 199.3 ohms
0 280 130 012 NA 2.85 K ohms 191.2 ohms
0 280 130 017 3.63 K ohms 1.74 K ohms 124.7 ohms
Not a chart, but a table. It comes from about 3/4 of the way down this page: http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/DJetParts.htm
The ECU page (http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/ecu.htm) has charts showing voltage on one specific point inside the ECU versus CHT resistance. That may have been what I was remembering.
--DD
Posted by: euro911 Sep 17 2016, 11:52 PM
So are you probing 
the community? 
I'll probably need a spare for the white car's 1.7L (1.9L)
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 18 2016, 12:43 AM
Well looks like there is enough commonality that they may be interchangeable, but not identical based on this -
Available new. The ...012 sensor is in short supply. Either sensor should work OK.
I'm looking at doing these again because I need them. Offering up the GB to those that are interested, but may raise the price to $75 after the GB if there's not much interest on these.
I did ping McMark on the phone today, but will follow up if he has a better answer. I may have located suitable materials for the build but can't check til Monday.
I don't have much of a choice as I do need one, so I will be working on a solution one way or another. Just really surprised that there's not much interest.
Posted by: McMark Sep 20 2016, 08:14 PM
I forwarded my info to Mark so he can proceed with this. 
If you're car doesn't run well until it warms up, you might have a CHT issue. Any stock FI car that's working correctly should run as well cold, as it does warm.
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 21 2016, 12:17 AM
SO,
As noted we will be making the Original Customs version of these. They will be 3-4 weeks out. I Like what Mark had going with these and we can make these available again.
The key here is we need some quantity to get the price down, so hopefully there is enough demand to make these pencil out. Right now the only sources that "say" they have them are at least $80.
The discussion I had with Mark was that most people don't realized these have failed as think as it's an old car it will run a little rough until it warms up. They just live with it.
We will be doing a diagnostic video (once my car is back together to show you the effect of the failed one I have and the improvement. There is a good possibility that a few could benefit from having these and don't realize it.
SO if you want in on the GB price you will need to bump the thread to get the code when ready.
Given the costs these will be about $60 after the GB
SO whos' in?
Posted by: euro911 Sep 21 2016, 04:05 AM
Yep, need at least one here 
Posted by: enikolayev Sep 21 2016, 06:37 AM
Count me in for one as well.
Posted by: Philip W. Sep 21 2016, 06:41 AM
I will take 2!
Posted by: Java2570 Sep 21 2016, 06:56 AM
Put me down for one!
Posted by: Mueller Sep 21 2016, 08:08 AM
I'm in for one, any discount if I machine my own housing?
Posted by: 914_teener Sep 21 2016, 08:24 AM
Mark.....I have one of the Originals that McMark built in my car. It runs
Flawless.
It has a discrete ground wire which I would recommend.
I.m in but IIRC the resistance values coincide with which ecu it is paired with.
I am definately in for my D.jet 2056 I am working on.
Posted by: jim_hoyland Sep 21 2016, 08:35 AM
I'm in too and want to support this
Posted by: Philip W. Sep 21 2016, 09:44 AM
I will take 2!
if they are spec for the 2.0 ....
Posted by: Shadowfax Sep 21 2016, 12:31 PM
if they are spec for the 2.0 ....
Me too. In for 1 on a '74 2.0 D-Jet.
Posted by: CMONNETT Sep 21 2016, 02:27 PM
I'll take three for a 2.0
Thanks,
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 21 2016, 10:15 PM
Thanks
I will update as this progresses.
Mark
Posted by: Mike D. Sep 21 2016, 10:29 PM
I'm in for 1!
Posted by: mangrum Sep 22 2016, 07:01 AM
1 for me please.
Posted by: ThinAir Sep 22 2016, 10:00 AM
I'm in for one.
Posted by: metalmorphosis Sep 22 2016, 10:56 AM
I'm in for one '73 1.7
Posted by: second wind Sep 22 2016, 01:07 PM
SO,
As noted we will be making the Original Customs version of these. They will be 3-4 weeks out. I Like what Mark had going with these and we can make these available again.
The key here is we need some quantity to get the price down, so hopefully there is enough demand to make these pencil out. Right now the only sources that "say" they have them are at least $80.
The discussion I had with Mark was that most people don't realized these have failed as think as it's an old car it will run a little rough until it warms up. They just live with it.
We will be doing a diagnostic video (once my car is back together to show you the effect of the failed one I have and the improvement. There is a good possibility that a few could benefit from having these and don't realize it.
SO if you want in on the GB price you will need to bump the thread to get the code when ready.
SO whos' in?
The way I am reading the thread is that there is lots of interest?! I want one for my '73 2.0 but I want the correct one, not a tweaked one. Build it and they will come.
BTW....I think all of us teeners will buy anything electrical that is an improvement over forty year old technology.....kind of like a knee replacement. Thank you!
Posted by: Eric_Shea Sep 22 2016, 03:07 PM
six
Posted by: luskesq Sep 22 2016, 04:05 PM
One for me please,
Keith
Posted by: RobW Sep 22 2016, 04:58 PM
I'm in for a 74 2.0 becoming a 2056.
Posted by: turk22 Sep 22 2016, 06:49 PM
I am in for one, I need the 73 2.0 L specs
Its my understanding that they are NLA and have the 0 280 130 017 P/N
According to Brad:
"The 1973 2.0L's came with the:
0 280 130 017 head temperature sensor,
039 971 762 A ballast resistor,
0 280 100 037 manifold pressure sensor, and the
022 906 021 E version of the ECU.
This set of components must be used together. "
Posted by: zambezi Sep 22 2016, 06:54 PM
I'm in for 1. '73 2 liter.
Jim
Posted by: warrenoliver Sep 22 2016, 08:01 PM
I'm in for one for a '73, 2.0.
Thanks
Posted by: Yanlx Sep 28 2016, 12:17 PM
5 for me please 73 2.0
thanks
Posted by: Marty Yeoman Sep 28 2016, 01:54 PM
Add my name to the list for one.
Can you provide some details regarding the proposed new design and how it might be customized to specific injection systems, engine sizes and model years?
Thanks, Marty
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 28 2016, 03:08 PM
Testing the parts now. But no, stock only for these. We could do others possibly, but on this stock only.
Posted by: second wind Sep 28 2016, 04:21 PM
Hey Mark.....so only 012 and not 017's?
Posted by: Jeff Bowlsby Sep 28 2016, 05:13 PM
I am down for 2 of the 012 Mark.
Posted by: euro911 Sep 28 2016, 06:33 PM
Jeff, off the top of your head, what would a 1.7L need?
... and would punching it out to a 1911 change anything?
Posted by: StratPlayer Sep 28 2016, 06:36 PM
1 012 for me please
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 28 2016, 07:20 PM
Jeff, off the top of your head, what would a 1.7L need?
... and would punching it out to a 1911 change anything?
I do have some 1.7 heads I can check.
Posted by: Jeff Bowlsby Sep 28 2016, 07:31 PM
A 1911 is a custom set-up so I cannot help you there.
Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 29 2016, 01:28 AM
Hey Mark.....so only 012 and not 017's?
This thread is 012 only. It's dialed in, and looks like we will start having parts ready in about 10 days,
Again you guys know how I work, if the numbers grow the cost will go down.
I was planning on running 100 units, but looks like I may be expanding production.
Posted by: RohJay Sep 29 2016, 02:14 AM
Please count me in for ONE. Thanks
Posted by: McMark Sep 29 2016, 07:19 AM
This CHT should never be used with the 73 ballast resistor. If you have the ballast resistor, it needs to be removed.
But then, you should only have the ballast resistor if you have a complete, actual, confirmed and complete set of 73 2.0 components (ECU, MPS, etc).
Posted by: pch1north Sep 30 2016, 01:02 AM
Got tired of looking for these some have them listed at $75 and 90, but no stock.
Not a particularly hard part to make, so Who's interested? I know I need one soon!
I'm in for 2
74 2.0
Posted by: pch1north Sep 30 2016, 01:11 AM
I'll take 2
74 2.0
Posted by: saigon71 Sep 30 2016, 06:41 AM
One for me please.
Thanks Mark!
Posted by: BeatNavy Oct 4 2016, 07:33 AM
It looks like you've made your bogey, Mark, but please count me in for one as well.
Thanks.
Posted by: 914_teener Oct 4 2016, 09:12 AM
I am in for one, I need the 73 2.0 L specs
Its my understanding that they are NLA and have the 0 280 130 017 P/N
According to Brad:
"The 1973 2.0L's came with the:
0 280 130 017 head temperature sensor,
039 971 762 A ballast resistor,
0 280 100 037 manifold pressure sensor, and the
022 906 021 E version of the ECU.
This set of components must be used together. "
My understanding of the above is that the 17 was used in conjunction with the 037 ecu and the the adjusted mps to account for tje volumetric change for just the 73 2 liter..hence McMarks statement.
I.m using a 74 ecu....which are becoming very difficult to find nowdays.
When do we send yoi money Mark?
Posted by: malcolm2 Oct 4 2016, 10:06 AM
Great! Gonna be ok for thT 1.8L L-Jet ?
I could not follow all the part #s, etc... but it sounds like you are making the part for the D-Jet FI, correct?
What will it take to get an L-Jet version? I would be interested in that.
Posted by: RohJay Oct 4 2016, 12:32 PM
Great! Gonna be ok for thT 1.8L L-Jet ?
I could not follow all the part #s, etc... but it sounds like you are making the part for the D-Jet FI, correct?
What will it take to get an L-Jet version? I would be interested in that.
The "012" Mark is refers to is Bosch part no. 0 280 130 012.
Which corresponds to both VAG #s 311 906 041A and 022 906 041.
It is correct for L-Jet
Posted by: malcolm2 Oct 4 2016, 12:41 PM
Great! Gonna be ok for thT 1.8L L-Jet ?
I could not follow all the part #s, etc... but it sounds like you are making the part for the D-Jet FI, correct?
What will it take to get an L-Jet version? I would be interested in that.
The "012" Mark is refers to is Bosch part no. 0 280 130 012.
Which corresponds to both VAG #s 311 906 041A and 022 906 041.
It is correct for L-Jet
GREAT. Then put me on the list......
I am equally confused in reading this...
http://www.ratwell.com/technical/TempSensorII.html#graph
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 4 2016, 04:46 PM
Drawing done. Stock inbound and will be cutting metal by end of the week. 1st parts will be available next week pending satisfactory testing.
Posted by: malcolm2 Oct 18 2016, 09:19 AM
any update on this part?
Posted by: Mueller Oct 18 2016, 09:57 AM
Count me in for one please.
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 18 2016, 10:19 AM
We are starting to cut metal and have the components to assemble. Should have 1st parts this week (Thurs -Fri).
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 20 2016, 12:07 AM
Got on these a little earlier than I planned (burning some midnight oil). Have the 1st prototype part done. It tests out good, but I'm looking at a couple different techniques to assemble that I want to try and test before the full production
I'll be working on these tomorrow. Looking at assembly starting this weekend, so I'm opening up the GB so it can be done with the other 2.
I'm quite happy how these have turned out.
Final production will be using a brass clip like OEM, I will have them in shortly, but needed to actually put this in my car after bench testing.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 20 2016, 01:47 AM
PMs going out to all
Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2016, 02:36 AM
Looks like you might have a larger market than originally anticipated too (meaning: bus parts stores, the Samba, etc.) 
I was just verifying if these were correct for 914 1.7L, and found the following info at one of the on-line bus parts sites:
Temp Sensor for Fuel Injection. (Discontinued) Part Reference Number: 0280130012
Type 3 (Squareback/Fastback)
1966 .... T Eng.
1967 ....
1968 .... U Eng.
1969 .... U Eng.
1970 .... U Eng.
1971 .... U Eng.
1972 .... U Eng.
1973 .... U Eng.
Type 4 (411/412)
1971 .... W Eng.
1972 .... EA Eng.
1973 .... EA Eng.
1974 .... H4; 1.7L; 1679cc
Bus (Type 2)
1968 .... B Eng.
1969 .... B Eng.
1970 .... B Eng.
1971 .... AE Eng.
1972 .... H4; 1.7L; 1679cc; CB Eng.
1973 .... FI; CB Eng.
1974 .... AW Eng.
1975 .... ED Eng.
1976 .... GD Eng.
1977 .... GD Eng.
1978 .... GE Eng.
1979 .... GE Eng.
Beetle
1971-1978
Super Beetle
1971-1979
Vanagon
Air Cooled : 1980-1983
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 20 2016, 02:44 AM
Paul Anders mentioned they were interchangeable. Curves look VERY close.
Posted by: Jett Oct 20 2016, 08:10 AM
Mark, if it's not too late I will take 4 (1.7, 1.8, 2x 2.0)
Thanks!!
Posted by: brownaar Oct 20 2016, 12:35 PM
I'll take 2.
Aaron
Posted by: Marty Yeoman Oct 20 2016, 05:08 PM
PayPal sent.
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 20 2016, 09:18 PM
Codes sent to those that bumped. The production on these will begin this next week, as we are just finishing up all the machining.
Thanks to all for helping to make this possible.
Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2016, 11:16 PM
Thank YOU, Mark 
Paypal sent for 1 CHT and 2 sets of door clips 
Posted by: RohJay Oct 21 2016, 12:14 AM
Mark, I have not received a PM...
Posted by: hex9145 Oct 21 2016, 11:08 AM
If still available I'll take one
Posted by: Yellow Resi Oct 21 2016, 04:18 PM
Got on these a little earlier than I planned (burning some midnight oil). Have the 1st prototype part done. It tests out good, but I'm looking at a couple different techniques to assemble that I want to try and test before the full production
I'll be working on these tomorrow. Looking at assembly starting this weekend, so I'm opening up the GB so it can be done with the other 2.
I'm quite happy how these have turned out.
Final production will be using a brass clip like OEM, I will have them in shortly, but needed to actually put this in my car after bench testing.
Please put me on the list for 1 , if possible 2 pieces.
Thanks
Posted by: Java2570 Oct 21 2016, 07:20 PM
Just ordered mine, thanks for doing these Mark!
Posted by: Wyvern Oct 21 2016, 07:40 PM
I this will work for a '73 1.7 I would like one .
Can you please verify that this will work ?
Thank you
Posted by: RohJay Oct 21 2016, 11:36 PM
I this will work for a '73 1.7 I would like one .
Can you please verify that this will work ?
Thank you
Yes It is correct for '73 1.7 :
FireShot_Capture_6___Temperature_Sensor_____http___www.ratwell.com_technical_TempSensorII.html_graph.png ( 23.95k )
Number of downloads: 39Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 22 2016, 09:41 AM
I’ve done some research into what Paul Anders detailed in the Djet system.
From his notes on the 0 280 130 003 and 0 280 130 012 versions of this part he mentioned
“012 sensor is in short supply. Either sensor should work OK.”
Looks like the curves are actually within 1.5% for the adjustability mixture control. that's on the rich side (of the 003 sensor) or about .5% of the final mixture (as it's about 30%).
I’ve checked the resistance curve on these and found them to be within 5%. As the fuel control is only adjustable by about 30% it would mean that the potential error would be about 1.5% too rich for a very cold start (about freezing) . the curve closes the warmer it gets.
For those that want to know the actual parts breakdown it goes like this –
70-73 - 1.7 sensor is the 0 280 130 003
74—76 – 2.0 sensor is the 0 280 130 012
73 2.0 used 0 280 130 017 but added a ballast resistor to compensate for the difference in the curve it had. Making it very similar to the 0 280 130 012, but will be richer on warm side and leaner when cold.
So the only thing I can possibly see a problem with is the 73 set up with the resistor present. If this applies to you, it’s possible the curve may be off some. If this is noticeable I can’t say for sure until I have feedback.
Just to note – Do not run ballast with my part with the ballast or wit will just be way too rich.
You will note that the attachment wire protection has been beefed up a little more than the OEM. This is because the wire on the stock part was known to break.
I have been told the 73 ECU will work as long as the ballast is not used.
Thanks
Mark
Posted by: Rob-O Oct 22 2016, 01:40 PM
I'll take one.
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 22 2016, 02:53 PM
Pm sent.
I will be closing out this group buy the 29th, so get them while on special price now, or pay more later. We plan to make our group buys shorter in duration, to encourage people to step up when they see them.
Thanks all!
Posted by: RohJay Oct 23 2016, 05:36 AM
Mark, I still have not received your PM with The Code.
Perhaps a glitch with the board messaging system?
Could you please forward it to my email address: rohjay@gmail.com.
Thanks
Posted by: 914four Oct 23 2016, 09:05 AM
I'll take one for a '74 2.0L. Please include with my ECU cover order if possible.
Kelvin
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 23 2016, 09:49 AM
Sent to all if I missed someone let me know.
Mark
Posted by: malcolm2 Oct 23 2016, 03:27 PM
Are we supposed to place and order on the website? Or is our post here save us a place in line?
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 23 2016, 04:15 PM
If interested you put your name down on the list here. I then contact you with the discount code to buy the part at the group buy price.
The GBs have a close date you don't have to buy right away, but probably don't want to wait too long.
PM sent
Posted by: Jboulder Oct 25 2016, 04:41 AM
I'll buy one!
Thanks,
Jackson
Posted by: Niklas Oct 25 2016, 06:23 AM
I take 4.
Niklas
Posted by: 914Sixer Oct 25 2016, 02:18 PM
I will take 1 to go with the 2 ECU caps.
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 25 2016, 05:58 PM
PMs sent to all
Posted by: Optimusglen Oct 26 2016, 07:23 AM
This may be a dumb question, for for cars converted to carbs are CHT sensors even used?
Posted by: pilothyer Oct 26 2016, 08:18 AM
This may be a dumb question, for for cars converted to carbs are CHT sensors even used?
Nope
Posted by: pilothyer Oct 26 2016, 08:21 AM
I need one Mark.......Thanks.................Jerry
Posted by: hex9145 Oct 26 2016, 12:28 PM
I'll take one please.
Posted by: VoPo914 Oct 26 2016, 12:36 PM
I'll take one 2.0L.
Thanks-Blaine
Posted by: TX914 Oct 27 2016, 06:04 AM
Mark, please include me in the group buy for a 0 280 130 012 version (for a '76 2.0). Thanks.
Posted by: sb914 Oct 27 2016, 06:37 AM
I'm in for one
Posted by: Firstcar Oct 27 2016, 12:23 PM
Mark,
I'll take one a 0 280 130 012 version (for a '74 2.0). Thanks.
-Scott
Posted by: Rob-O Oct 27 2016, 09:23 PM
Got the PM with the code, but can't find this on your site. Got a link to it? It's not in the GB Specials section on 914Rubber...
Posted by: Rob-O Oct 27 2016, 09:24 PM
Oh for crying out loud...I found it!
Posted by: sofi2t81 Oct 28 2016, 04:04 AM
I'm in for one 74, 2.0
Peter
Posted by: Porschef Oct 28 2016, 04:23 AM
Yeah, me too. Just in case.
Thanks for makin' what you make.
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 29 2016, 11:29 AM
Thanks all, thin k I have PM'd all the GB price discount code.
This special price ends TODAY !
Bump this thread if you want the special price!
Posted by: Firstcar Oct 29 2016, 11:47 AM
Thanks all, thin k I have PM'd all the GB price discount code.
This special price ends TODAY !
Bump this thread if you want the special price!
Mark,
Didn't get a PM from you - post #96.
-Scott
Posted by: Marty Yeoman Oct 29 2016, 03:24 PM
Sensor arrived.
Thanks, Mark
Posted by: Wyvern Oct 29 2016, 09:44 PM
Got mine today ... thank you .
Any quick tips for removal and install.
Was thinking a 13mm deep socket "slightly modified"
or bending a 13mm wrench .
Posted by: Mueller Oct 29 2016, 10:59 PM
Got mine, thanks for doing this.
Posted by: sofi2t81 Oct 30 2016, 05:09 AM
Hello Mark,
Didn't receive a PM. Post no. 99.
thanks
Peter.
Posted by: Philip W. Oct 30 2016, 05:18 AM
Ordered and paid!
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 30 2016, 05:48 AM
PMs resent.
Let me know if you have any problems ordering, but code sound work to the 31st.
Mark
Posted by: McMark Oct 30 2016, 09:12 AM
The 914Rubber production CHT units will have the correct connector. The unit pictured is just a mockup.
For the benefit of other members, the red/blue/yellow colored connectors are a travesty of automotive wiring. They are NOT sufficient for ANY automotive use. Use correct double crimp connectors with heat shrink.
Attached image(s)
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 30 2016, 10:12 AM
Yes it was just a mock up. The production ones have the correct connectors.
Posted by: malcolm2 Oct 30 2016, 10:19 AM
Got mine today ... thank you .
Any quick tips for removal and install.
Was thinking a 13mm deep socket "slightly modified"
or bending a 13mm wrench .
The wire does get in the way. But your method should do the trick.
It has been too long. Should we use spark plug type anti sieze?
Posted by: Jett Oct 30 2016, 10:58 AM
Thanks Mark, ordered this morning for our 73 1.7.
Has anyone installed the sensor in a 73 2.0/4? Does it work well?
Posted by: Mikey914 Oct 31 2016, 06:08 AM
Got mine today ... thank you .
Any quick tips for removal and install.
Was thinking a 13mm deep socket "slightly modified"
or bending a 13mm wrench .
The wire does get in the way. But your method should do the trick.
It has been too long. Should we use spark plug type anti sieze?
Definitely used at least a deep socket. A box wrench on the end of a spark plug socket will allow you to snug it up. You don't need a bunch of pressure as it's really not going anywhere.
Last day code is good is today use it or loose it.
Posted by: GOT9146 Apr 20 2017, 12:25 PM
Any idea when more will be available?
Posted by: Mikey914 Apr 20 2017, 05:22 PM
IN stock now
http://shop.914rubber.com/Cylinder-Head-Temperature-Sensor-conforms-to-0-280-130-012-Spec-0-280-130-012.htm?categoryId=-1
Posted by: xicema17x May 18 2017, 03:14 PM
IN stock now
http://shop.914rubber.com/Cylinder-Head-Temperature-Sensor-conforms-to-0-280-130-012-Spec-0-280-130-012.htm?categoryId=-1
Hi Mark, I saw a bunch of responses for 71-73 914s, but just wanted to confirm first, would these work for 76 2.0 914 as well?
Many Thanks,
Jason
Posted by: Mikey914 May 18 2017, 11:20 PM
Yep, no problem on the 76.
Posted by: xicema17x May 19 2017, 11:45 AM
Yep, no problem on the 76.
Thanks so much, I'll be putting an order in today! Much appreciated...
Jason
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)