Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 23 2017, 10:10 AM

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark

Posted by: seanpaulmc Sep 23 2017, 10:37 AM

Bump

Posted by: markhoward Sep 23 2017, 11:00 AM

count me in

Posted by: 914_teener Sep 23 2017, 11:32 AM

I'm in Mark....for the next motor.

Need two inner door seals as well for my passenger side.

Posted by: walterolin Sep 23 2017, 11:38 AM

More crack - I'm in for one.

Posted by: 914Next Sep 23 2017, 11:46 AM

Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.

Posted by: Olympic 914 Sep 23 2017, 06:25 PM

What is the cold Ohm resistance ?

Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 23 2017, 07:15 PM

Depends on the temperature.
These are matched to the 2.0 curve.

Posted by: draganc Sep 23 2017, 08:26 PM

Mark,

Count me in for one.

Thanks,
dc

Posted by: Porschef Sep 24 2017, 06:18 AM

I'll give one a whirl

Posted by: Freezin 914 Sep 24 2017, 06:26 AM

I will take one,

Posted by: Olympic 914 Sep 24 2017, 06:45 AM

I'll give one a try also, send me the code...

Posted by: whitetwinturbo Sep 24 2017, 09:19 AM

Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 25 2017, 02:06 AM

The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one.

Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 25 2017, 02:09 AM

I will be sending out codes here late today. I also have 3 other GBs running so you can combine.
They are -
- The CHT for D jet PN 0280130012
-shift bushings GB
-GB for Mirror - Late
-GB for the positive terminal block that will be launching tonight and I'm working on a complete cable option.


Thanks all!

Posted by: turk22 Sep 25 2017, 08:04 PM

I will take one as well

Posted by: Mikey914 Sep 26 2017, 09:07 PM

PMs sent to all so far
Closing this sunday.

Posted by: JamesM Oct 2 2017, 02:04 AM

Double check that. If my memory serves me the "proper" sensor for a 73 2.0 setup had a resistance curve that was quite a bit different off by something like >1k ohms when cold. 73 was an odd duck setup as it used a unique CHT and MPS to get the 2.0 to run correctly on the 72 1.7 ECU. 74 the 2.0 got a unique ECU and went back to using sensors with curves closer to the 1.7s.

Ill see if I can dig up the data, if not I have both a 73 and 74 setup I can compare.

Posted by: JamesM Oct 2 2017, 02:31 AM

Looks like Brand Anders has some of the data on his site.
https://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/DJetParts.htm

At operating temp they are similar but the warm-up curve is significantly different. Long time ago I had a 73 with a miss matched CHT sensor, ran like absolute garbage until it came up to temp. It will run, warmup is trash though. That was actually the motor i did my first Megasquirt build on because even 15 years ago it was near impossible to find the 017 sensor a 73 2.0 needs.

If you want to save guys running 73 2.0s a lot of headaches make a run of these with a thermistor that has the same curve as the 0 280 130 017 sensor.