Hello all,
I am loving my cars as light as possible, and do not care if it means them being louder. I already removed the firewall pad in the engine bay, as well as all the tar on the floor of the car.
I therefore use it (well used it before this winter's work) quite regularly with my wife and my son, so do need the "third seat"/backpad.
My question is : do I need this insulation pad behind the backpad ?
For temperature issues for example? Or is it only for acoustic reasons (meaning I will not mount it back )
Thanks
Antoine
Sounds like you’ve already made your mind up! Hahahah.
Personally i found no difference in temperature when I ran without one. BUT it did seem
to lessen the decibels and vibrations in the cabin. In my current project I’m not running the interior one but I am using the engine side pad from RIX . If you find you don’t like without one there are plenty of options. Dynamat, etc.
PS: Your metal work is looking fantastic Antione.
I ran my 1st teener without rear bulkhead insulation. None on inside. None on outside. Like you I also ran without the tar on the floors. I wanted ever bit of excess weight gone.
The various bits of tar and matting are for acoustic purposes. It was substantially louder. Being 20 at the time, I didn't care.
Now being a bit older , and maybe a bit wiser, I will run Dynamat. It is much more effective than the old mat and weighs less per square foot. A good compromise if you're interested in giving up a bit of weight for a quieter car.
I’ll use lizard skin.
Sounds is one thing. Vibration is the reason for tar mats, 70's teck. I thought about using the lizard skin on the 6, but I went with Upol. Maybe on the next car I will try lizard skin matching paint trough out car.
Matt
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)