Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

914World.com _ 914World Garage _ Engine cooling flaps and thermostat

Posted by: chris914 Oct 19 2007, 09:59 PM

Do you need to have the cooling flaps and thermostat?

Will the engine run cooler with out them?

Posted by: euro911 Oct 19 2007, 10:05 PM

Good question ... I'd like to know too

also, what to do with the lower outlets if one decides to eliminate the heat exchanger tin or run something like Tangerine headers unsure.gif

popcorn[1].gif

Posted by: toon1 Oct 19 2007, 10:37 PM

If you are talking about the cooling flaps on the fan shroud YES you need them.

the bigger flap on the pass side if the motor directs air over the oil cooler.

There are also two flaps on the lower side of the shroud for the heaters, you need them too.

the bellows/ themostat is noce to have but not completely necassary, it's ususally broken

Posted by: jd74914 Oct 19 2007, 10:48 PM

Technically you could remove the thermostat and wedge the flaps in the position that they attain when the engine is warmed up. I wouldn't do that since it will take the engine longer to heat up to operating temperature, but if you could do it.

Posted by: chris914 Oct 20 2007, 12:36 AM

QUOTE(jd74914 @ Oct 19 2007, 09:48 PM) *

Technically you could remove the thermostat and wedge the flaps in the position that they attain when the engine is warmed up. I wouldn't do that since it will take the engine longer to heat up to operating temperature, but if you could do it.


What are other people doing with the stock tins to get the most cooling?

Posted by: Hammy Oct 20 2007, 12:46 AM

You can go without the thermostat but you definitely need the cooling flaps.

Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2007, 12:53 AM

I cut away my H/E tins because they were crappy anyway AND I installed an electric heater in the passenger compartment. Getting rid of the tins made doing valve adjustments a lot nicer too.

I capped off the lower outlets with rubberized tube caps and hose-clamps, however, someone told me that I should leave them open ... if they were capped off, it would cause the air flow to stall or cavitate, causing the engine to run hotter ... unsure.gif

On another note, I just noticed that the cable from the thermostat bellows is broken on my wife's car. Is this a big deal (we live in So Cal)

... do I need to 'fix' the flaps in any certain position if the cable can't be reconnected (or if I remove the thermostat completely?) confused24.gif

popcorn[1].gif

Posted by: Hammy Oct 20 2007, 01:27 AM

QUOTE(euro911 @ Oct 19 2007, 11:53 PM) *



... do I need to 'fix' the flaps in any certain position if the cable can't be reconnected (or if I remove the thermostat completely?) confused24.gif

popcorn[1].gif


The flaps should flip open to the full cooling "fail safe" position when the thermo cable breaks or is missing.

Posted by: Bleyseng Oct 20 2007, 11:20 AM

QUOTE(chris914 @ Oct 19 2007, 11:36 PM) *

QUOTE(jd74914 @ Oct 19 2007, 09:48 PM) *

Technically you could remove the thermostat and wedge the flaps in the position that they attain when the engine is warmed up. I wouldn't do that since it will take the engine longer to heat up to operating temperature, but if you could do it.


What are other people doing with the stock tins to get the most cooling?


Using the all the stock tin cools it the best! w00t.gif

Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2007, 01:42 PM

Understood on the upper flaps & thermostat ... I will eventually get around to repairing the cable on my wife's car ('71 1.7)

----------------

When I removed the stock exhaust system on my car ('75 2.0) and cut the H/E tin off of them, I noticed that the small lower flaps (into the H/E's) were missing.

SO ...

If one decides to completely eliminate the heat exchanger tin or if running after-market headers, should they:

1. Cap the lower outlets ?
2. Leave them open ?

----------------

Another issue:

I got a phone call last night and the cooling subject brought up this interesting tid-bit:

... using slightly-modified late-model type-1 lower cooling tin plates for more uniform air flow around the cylinders (the ones that have rectangular cutouts in the bottom) ... anyone else doing this on T-4's?

I happen to have a set of them laying in the garage somewhere and will use them if they do actually provide better cooling properties.


Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2007, 02:58 PM

Hey, this site acting up a bit ! WTF.gif

Posted by: euro911 Oct 20 2007, 03:23 PM

(Multiple post of the same message) shades.gif

There's no delet post button either dry.gif

Posted by: joeav8tor Oct 23 2007, 02:10 PM

I have a 73 2.0 with stock fuel injection, the thermostat works...the way it is designed the flapper over the oil cooler is open when the engine is cool and the flapper on the other side is closed (they are opposite of each other) as the engine warms up the thermostat expands allowing the cable to close the flapper over the oil cooler (routing the air through the cooler) while allowing the flapper on the other side to open...I dont know how necessary the thermostat is, and whether the flappers need to be open at any point, but I know that the air passing through the oil cooler is a good thing, and if the german engineers designed it to work in a particular way, I would rather the thermostat and flappers work, than not.
just learned that by taking the tin off and heating up the thermostat...watching what happens.
flag.gif
Joe

Posted by: AvalonFal Oct 23 2007, 05:57 PM

Anyone have a pic of what the flaps should look like? Or is there a pic in a book or maual showing it?

Posted by: Rand Oct 23 2007, 06:17 PM

There's a spring on the bar between the flaps... If the thermostat fails or the cable breaks, the flaps snap into full-cooling position by default. No need to wedge anything into place. But maybe rotate them and let go to be sure they snap back into position.

Running without the thermostat only affects warm-up time. Not a big deal to run without. But certainly don't remove the flaps!! It will affect the oil cooler in a bad way. And don't modify the tin unless you REALLY know what you're doing. Almost all backyard cooling mods cause adverse results. The factory setup is adequate.

There are some old threads around here on this. One I recall that had pics and full explanations about how all this works. Maybe someone will use the search function and post some links.

Posted by: chris914 Oct 24 2007, 02:55 AM

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=55686&hl=flaps++cooling
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?act=ST&f=5&t=30107

Posted by: McMark Oct 24 2007, 04:07 AM

Type 1 lower tins are not useable. The stock T4 tin already has an under cylinder tins.

Posted by: Dave_Darling Oct 25 2007, 09:59 AM

Supposedly, modified Type I under-cylinder tin is best when used with an upright cooling conversion (a la Type I cooling). The stock Type IV tins are best when used with stock type "pancake" cooling.

Or at least, that's what I have read over on the shoptalkforums BBS.

--DD

Posted by: euro911 Oct 25 2007, 10:10 AM

shades.gif

Thanks Dave ... I'll use the T-4's then
biggrin.gif

Posted by: Joe Ricard Oct 25 2007, 11:01 AM

Best thing to do with the stock cooling system is to make sure it all works. and is optimized.
like having the tins seal off tight. the flapper tins in the fan housing operate through the full range of motion.

Posted by: chris914 Oct 25 2007, 11:17 AM

QUOTE(Joe Ricard @ Oct 25 2007, 10:01 AM) *

Best thing to do with the stock cooling system is to make sure it all works. and is optimized.
like having the tins seal off tight. the flapper tins in the fan housing operate through the full range of motion.


I did see the seals on some old engine tins. What is everyone using now a days?

Posted by: yeahmag Oct 25 2007, 01:03 PM

Does anyone know how tight to make the cable connection? I used vice grips to keep mine taught while I clamped the cable to the cross bar? In Jake's video it shows them just sort of loosely clamping the cable to the flaps.

-Aaron

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)