Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

914World.com _ 914World Garage _ 1.7 vs. 2.0

Posted by: gdurawa Mar 17 2009, 02:28 PM

Am looking for a clean 2.0L 914 but having a difficult time finding one in the Northeast for under $6,000. Would a 1.7L or 1.8L be competitive in Autocross if a 2.0L is not available?
Thanks

Posted by: dr914@autoatlanta.com Mar 17 2009, 02:32 PM

QUOTE(gdurawa @ Mar 17 2009, 01:28 PM) *

Am looking for a clean 2.0L 914 but having a difficult time finding one in the Northeast for under $6,000. Would a 1.7L or 1.8L be competitive in Autocross if a 2.0L is not available?
Thanks


the most important thing is the body. Don't worry about the engine. 2.0 engines are readily available. A 2.0 is much spunkier feeling than a 1.8 but the 1.8 fuel injection is smoother less complicated and gets better gas mileage.

Posted by: dw914er Mar 17 2009, 02:55 PM

what the doc said... A good body is more important than the motor, which you can can find a replacement, or make bigger

Posted by: Dave_Darling Mar 17 2009, 10:34 PM

If you're talking SCCA stock or SP classes, the answer is "none of the above". The 914 is quite simply outclassed in both of those classes.

For PCA, it depends on which region or zone you'll be running with.

If you're running with another outfit, you'll have to check through their rules.

The 2.0 offers more torque across the board and more power than the 1.7 or the 1.8 does. Unless there are upgrades allowed the smaller-engine'd cars that are not allowed the 2.0s (lighter weight, better suspension, etc.) then the 2.0 will be more competitive than the 1.7 or 1.8 914.

--DD

Posted by: gdurawa Mar 18 2009, 10:06 AM

I was hoping to compete in SCCA SP C class against Miatas and the Solstice and thought the 914 could keep up with them, but I guess 40 years of technology is a lot to make up for.
Thanks

Posted by: sean_v8_914 Mar 18 2009, 11:15 AM

the modern cars have better power.

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)