Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cheap Engines, 1911 cc - 100 hp
McMark
post Sep 28 2004, 09:37 PM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Jakes looking at making these kits available for what's a really reasonable price.

Here's the details: Engine Thread on Jakes Forum

I'll put them together for cheap labor.

He's only making four right now, but email him for details.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 28 2004, 11:04 PM
Post #2


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Yep,two of them sold today!

I really want to make it easier for guys to get their car done right and use my stuff. This is just the first step.

Many more to follow.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
i love porsche
post Sep 29 2004, 05:45 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,547
Joined: 6-May 04
From: Nutley, NJ
Member No.: 2,030
Region Association: North East States



looks good..but im still saving for my 2056 rebuild...hopefully more than 100hp
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Sep 29 2004, 10:42 AM
Post #4


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,080
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



one would think a kit for a 2.0, with the correct pistons would be the same price. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Sep 29 2004, 02:45 PM
Post #5


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,071
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Weber'd 1911's rock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rocking nana.gif) BTDT, and it was a blast.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Sep 29 2004, 02:52 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



1911's with 2.0 heads ROCK..


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Sep 29 2004, 03:41 PM
Post #7


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(rhodyguy @ Sep 29 2004, 08:42 AM)
one would think a kit for a 2.0, with the correct pistons would be the same price. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

kevin

1.7 cranks and rods can be had for almost nothing, 2.0 cranks and rods go for a pretty penny. Jake is trying to make some use ($) out of his undoubtedly abundant supply of these paperweights.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 29 2004, 06:09 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



A 2.0 crank is 3 times the crank as a 66 stroke crank...

1.7/1.8 rods are 4 times cheaper than 2.0 rods.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Sep 29 2004, 07:40 PM
Post #9


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,080
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



got core (2.0). need kit. key is, all the bits and ends to assemble.

kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 29 2004, 08:30 PM
Post #10


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



no sweat at all..........
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Sep 29 2004, 08:48 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Whats up with the STF? It appears to be down.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thesey914
post Sep 30 2004, 12:46 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 1-January 03
From: Staffordshire -England
Member No.: 66



QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ Sep 29 2004, 09:52 PM)
1911's with 2.0 heads ROCK..


B

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) Feels more like 120 HP
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Sep 30 2004, 12:27 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,544
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ Sep 29 2004, 12:52 PM)
1911's with 2.0 heads ROCK..


B

Wouldn't it make more sense to use 1.8 heads, being that this is a "econo" kit? That way you wouldn't have the added expense of hunting down 2.0 sheet metal? Besides, aren't the 2.0 heads more likely to crack than the 1.8? Or will the 1.8 heads limit your hp real bad?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Sep 30 2004, 12:31 PM
Post #14


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



I don't know what Jake's using for these kits. Shoptalk is down right now. But what you're saying makes sense. I don't think this is supposed to be an ULTIMATELY cheap kit. Just cheaper than the full engines Jake does.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 30 2004, 01:53 PM
Post #15


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



It's good parts for less money due to the cores being cheap and plentiful.

The heads are 1.7 or 1.8 with 42x36 valves........

We are talking a complete engine kit for less than 2800 bucks if you have cores- Thats a steal especially since its got my combo.

Even with 1.8 heads or for that fact 1.7 heads this combo will make 100HP, I have never tested a bone stock 2.0 that made 100HP on my dyno.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bruce Allert
post Sep 30 2004, 03:11 PM
Post #16


Hellions asleep
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,289
Joined: 19-March 03
From: Eagle Creek, Orygun
Member No.: 441
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



What goes into making a complete kit? Does it include the valves & such along with all (totally) innards to fill a block? Sorry for my ignorance. I haven't gotten into the "engine internal" as yet but would sure like to.

I haven't known what I was doing when I took on any of the repairs since I got the car but I've learned (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) (I think)!

........b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 30 2004, 03:30 PM
Post #17


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Everything to make a longblock.......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Sep 30 2004, 05:43 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,544
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



Ok, so let me rephrase the question: Why would you go with the added expense of 2.0 heads and sheet metal if you can get the same performance from a 1.8 head, properly built?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Sep 30 2004, 06:14 PM
Post #19


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE
Ok, so let me rephrase the question: Why would you go with the added expense of 2.0 heads and sheet metal if you can get the same performance from a 1.8 head, properly built?


I just built a motor like this, 1.8 bottem end, fresh 2.0 heads, no additional costs since I had all the parts....it would have cost me more to rebuild the 1.8 heads, even more so to get them up to 2.0 standards (I thought I read that 2.0 are good for approx 10 hp right off the bat over the 1.7 and 1.8 heads)

what was meant with the "1911's rock" by Mike and Brad was to let people know that there is potential in the smaller stroke motors and that motors other than the 2.0 can be fun....my first 914 had a 1911 (1.8 based) and my driving instructors thought it pulled better than their 2.0 914's (IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Sep 30 2004, 06:30 PM
Post #20


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



Let me see if I hear the deal correctly.
$3799.00 get's me a crate of high quality parts?

I must assemble It myself ( risky ) or pay to get it assembled ( expensive ).

Seems like $5k or more to me (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif)

I'm looking at a SIX conversion for under $4k, including a
running engine. ( that I can do myself )

To each his own...

KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 04:43 PM