Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Exhaust question for 2.0l case with 1.8 heads
Tdskip
post Jan 10 2019, 09:05 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Newbie Type 4 question here - are the exhausts interchange post exhaust manifolds that come from the heads?

Assuming that the total flow would be based on the displacement?

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jan 11 2019, 01:03 AM
Post #2


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,980
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The exhausts are interchangeable as a unit. The heat exchangers, muffler, and muffler hanger must match, but they don't care which version of the 914 engine they go on.

There were three factory versions of the exhaust: The 1.7 version (which was also used on the 74 1.8s), the 2.0 version (73-74 2-liters), and the late version (used on all 75-76 914s, both 1.8 and 2 liter).

The late exhaust is the only one that has a separate "header" piece that bolts to the exhaust ports, both earlier versions have the header and heat exchanger as a single part.

Note that the heater stuff that bolts up to the exchangers will swap between the 1.7 and 2.0 versions of the exhaust, most the late style heater bits only bolt up to the late style exhaust.

Here is a pic of the two early style heat exchangers, courtesy of Jeff Bowlsby's tech pages:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/bowlsby.net-121-1547190238.1.jpg)

Here's a pic of the late style ones:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads/post-5678-1233594136.jpg)

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 07:52 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Thanks Dave - very helpful!

My exhaust tip is about the size of a Starbucks straw which is what triggered the question but I’m not sure what is actually connected othe engine.

Let me get the car in the air and see what I have going on with the rest of the system
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 11 2019, 08:38 AM
Post #4


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



The 1.7/1.8 vs 2.0 SSI they both are the same size tube so flow the same. Stock muffler the 2.0 is the clear winner, but can only be used with the 2.0 exchangers.
All things being equal with a similar aftermarket muffler/header, they'll be the same as far as flow/HP numbers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 08:48 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Good morning, thanks for the follow up.

It’s entirely possible that someone just put a super small exhaust tip on a correct set up, but my guess is that the muffler is undersized for the 2 L in it it.

Ultimately, I suppose, the exhaust gases need to get out of the exhaust tip so if that’s undersized the whole system will be compromised .
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post Jan 11 2019, 02:14 PM
Post #6


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,318
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



A better question Skip, would be why the heck would anybody want 1.8 heads on a 2.0 case!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif)

Why not correctly build your engine as a proper 2.0 - & then use the 8.0:1 CR Euro P&C's with the proper 2L heads for a little more HP & TQ out of it!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

PS - the Euro 2.0 P&Cs got a factory stated 100 HP vs 91 on the USA 7.:1 CR version, & AFAIK the factory Meyle Euro P&Cs are still around, if you check with the usual sources.

Then use the 2L SSI HEs & 2L Banana exhaust on that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:18 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Tom_T @ Jan 11 2019, 03:14 PM) *

A better question Skip, would be why the heck would anybody want 1.8 heads on a 2.0 case!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif)

Why not correctly build your engine as a proper 2.0 - & then use the 8.0:1 CR Euro P&C's with the proper 2L heads for a little more HP & TQ out of it!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

PS - the Euro 2.0 P&Cs got a factory stated 100 HP vs 91 on the USA 7.:1 CR version, & AFAIK the factory Meyle Euro P&Cs are still around, if you check with the usual sources.

Then use the 2L SSI HEs & 2L Banana exhaust on that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////


Hi Tom! Conveniently I get to answer that I have no idea because I haven’t built it like this. This is how it came.

I’m just trying to get this car happy so I can use it as is for a while before throwing anymore time or significant money at it.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Jan 11 2019, 02:31 PM
Post #8


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,603
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



original poster said "2.0 case"

that doesn't guarantee that it is a 2.0 engine...
he may not realize that all cases are the same
and he did not clarify if its a 2.0 crank/rods
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:50 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Jan 11 2019, 03:31 PM) *

original poster said "2.0 case"

that doesn't guarantee that it is a 2.0 engine...
he may not realize that all cases are the same
and he did not clarify if its a 2.0 crank/rods


Hi - yes, was trying to be specific. From what I was told it’s a 2.0 L bottom end with 1.8 heads that were tailored to fit. She feels quite lively, has decent torque for whatever that’s worth. Thanks for the response by the way.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:56 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Check out this awesomeness



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:56 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:57 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 02:58 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Jan 11 2019, 03:01 PM
Post #14


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,220
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Tdskip @ Jan 11 2019, 03:50 PM) *

QUOTE(brant @ Jan 11 2019, 03:31 PM) *

original poster said "2.0 case"

that doesn't guarantee that it is a 2.0 engine...
he may not realize that all cases are the same
and he did not clarify if its a 2.0 crank/rods


Hi - yes, was trying to be specific. From what I was told it’s a 2.0 L bottom end with 1.8 heads that were tailored to fit. She feels quite lively, has decent torque for whatever that’s worth. Thanks for the response by the way.

Some guys prefer to use 1.8 heads for their performance engines. I have no idea if this was the case with yours.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Jan 11 2019, 03:10 PM
Post #15


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,603
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(mepstein @ Jan 11 2019, 02:01 PM) *

QUOTE(Tdskip @ Jan 11 2019, 03:50 PM) *

QUOTE(brant @ Jan 11 2019, 03:31 PM) *

original poster said "2.0 case"

that doesn't guarantee that it is a 2.0 engine...
he may not realize that all cases are the same
and he did not clarify if its a 2.0 crank/rods


Hi - yes, was trying to be specific. From what I was told it’s a 2.0 L bottom end with 1.8 heads that were tailored to fit. She feels quite lively, has decent torque for whatever that’s worth. Thanks for the response by the way.

Some guys prefer to use 1.8 heads for their performance engines. I have no idea if this was the case with yours.



Also pull the case numbers...
it could be a big bore kit on a 1.8 which makes it effectively a 2.0
and often people will call a big bore motor a "2 liter"
This is the most likely reason for someone to have 1.8 heads on a "2 liter"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 11 2019, 03:13 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Jan 11 2019, 04:10 PM) *

QUOTE(mepstein @ Jan 11 2019, 02:01 PM) *

QUOTE(Tdskip @ Jan 11 2019, 03:50 PM) *

QUOTE(brant @ Jan 11 2019, 03:31 PM) *

original poster said "2.0 case"

that doesn't guarantee that it is a 2.0 engine...
he may not realize that all cases are the same
and he did not clarify if its a 2.0 crank/rods


Hi - yes, was trying to be specific. From what I was told it’s a 2.0 L bottom end with 1.8 heads that were tailored to fit. She feels quite lively, has decent torque for whatever that’s worth. Thanks for the response by the way.

Some guys prefer to use 1.8 heads for their performance engines. I have no idea if this was the case with yours.



Also pull the case numbers...
it could be a big bore kit on a 1.8 which makes it effectively a 2.0
and often people will call a big bore motor a "2 liter"
This is the most likely reason for someone to have 1.8 heads on a "2 liter"


Thanks guys - great input, thanks.

It is a 2.0L case, don't have the number at my finger tips, but I checked it before I bought it and it's is (or was) a proper 2.0L case and not from a Bus.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tdskip
post Jan 12 2019, 09:13 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,678
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Good morning - to close this out should I be looking for a matched set of 2.0l headers or heat exchangers and muffler?

Thanks for all for the help yesterday, I know I was a bit rapid fire but I had the time and three cars needed attention. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 09:17 AM