Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914-6 alignment specs, optimum suspension settings for the stre
SC850R
post Sep 3 2003, 07:49 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 21-April 03
Member No.: 595



I would appreciate any suggestions anyone might have for alignment specs. My car is a 2.7 liter 6 with a 911 front suspension and 7 and 8 inch fuchs ft and rr. I had the car realinged as suggested by a local tuner and it went from predictable, understeer to a tail happy, unstable beast that tries to swap ends even with highway lane changes. My hope was to optimize the performance of the car, but its really unstable now (keep in mind I like neutral to slight oversteer, but this is unsettling (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif) ). High speed sweepers are a nightmare!
BEFORE
left front> -0.7 camber right front> -0.3 camber
left rear> -0.6 camber right rear> --1.8 camber
toe at the front was 0.15 (toe out I think)
toe at the rear was 0.00

AFTER
left front> -1.1 right front> -1.2
left rear> -1.2 left rear> -1.3
toe at the front> -0.03
toe at the rear> -0.05

What do other people use? Why did the car change so dramatically? Could the toe change have had such a dramatic effect? There were no changes in the tires or tire pressure. Help
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 7)
ArtechnikA
post Sep 3 2003, 08:15 PM
Post #2


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SC850R @ Sep 3 2003, 05:49 PM)
BEFORE
toe at the rear was 0.00

AFTER
toe at the rear> -0.05

... Could the toe change have had such a dramatic effect?

if by these numbers you mean you went from 0 rear toe to some toe out, you betcha. rear toe out is BAD. (a little up front can help turn-in on the AX track).

too little toe up front (either direction) can make the car twitchy - the tires need to have some preload slip angle before they can be responsive.

you didn't mention caster, but too little can hurt stability too. try for as much as you can get - typically around 6 deg is what you get - it should just be the same side to side.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Sep 3 2003, 08:38 PM
Post #3


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



I don't like all that camber, rear around -1, and back to about what you had up front, -.7 or so..

Street, stock tires.

I am with Rich, having rear toe is like driving a car with super heavy rear springs, and no front swaybar, except worse.


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
si2t3m
post Sep 3 2003, 08:50 PM
Post #4


914 addict
**

Group: Members
Posts: 346
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Qc, Canada
Member No.: 119



Hi, on my 914-6 conversion (3.0, 911 front end with underbody swaybar, 6's up front and 7's rears, no rear swaybar) :

0 toe front
-1.3 camber front
-1.7 camber rear
Caster was maxed out but event on both sides.
0 toe front
1/16 toe-in rear

All this was done with me (200lbs) in the car with a 1/2 tank of gas.

Car felt pretty good at the last DE. It's a bit twitchy on the highway due to the 0 toe front but i like it that way.

Marc-André
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SC850R
post Sep 3 2003, 09:44 PM
Post #5


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 21-April 03
Member No.: 595



I think the minus 0.05 toe in the rear is toe in, but I could be wrong. If it is toe out that would explain a LOT!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty
post Sep 3 2003, 09:45 PM
Post #6


The Fun Never Stops
***

Group: Members
Posts: 773
Joined: 20-May 03
From: Portland. Oregon (SW)
Member No.: 718
Region Association: None



You've got to have a front swaybar (and dangit, your wheel/tire combo is nice!)

I have 6" wheels with 195/65 tires all-around...

My settings are pretty close to Marc-André's (-1.0f/-1.5r camber and I run 1/16" more toe in all around f/r, caster at 6.0)... before I installed the front bar (now at full on -- full "off" was as good as no bar), the car was... "exciting" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif) to drive in a spirited fashion. Now it's fine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Sep 4 2003, 01:24 AM
Post #7


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Marc has good settings. Unless your good friends of this alignment guy.. you need to find a new one. I have NO idea where he came up with your numbers.


Oh.. welcome to the BBS ..ha ha (IMG:style_emoticons/default/clap56.gif)


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SC850R
post Sep 10 2003, 06:51 PM
Post #8


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 21-April 03
Member No.: 595



Guess what folks- it was toed out in the rear! The guy's reply to me when I brought the car back to them? "Oh yeah thats toe out- yeah it will make it squirrlley (sp)!" And they returned the car to me this way why?????? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif) Thanks to everyone for their help!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 03:28 AM