Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Running GREAT and then rough…..hhhhmmmm, engine runs rough at one place in the power band
ctc911ctc
post Dec 13 2019, 10:16 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



-Update -

I removed the TPS, calibrated it as per instructions on the Bird. Here are some pictures.
I would like to be able to "RING" this out, not sure what I would be looking for. Though we know that one course is to install a new board and then calibrate. There is little else I could find to assure operation. Any experience with asserting these things are good.

Some pics
Attached Image
Attached Image

Any ideas would be great!

-End of Update-


I am a bit befuddled as to which way to go so I decided that the 914W team would like to hear about this puzzle.

Background
'74 2.0, garaged from '84 until 2018, 22K miles
Running since June.
Repaired or replaced:
Entire Fuel System - tank, lines, injectors, pump, pressure reg
Adjusted the valves
Removed and rang-out the engine harness,
Rebuilt the MPS
Rebuilt the Plenum and tested it for leaks - none observed
New gaskets at the plenum and manifold at the engine
Rebuilt Throttle Body, very minor leaks around the actuator (throttle), New circuit card
New Plugs, points, cap and inspected the distributor for all of the regular ailments - super tight.

Engine idles great, pulls like a monster - sounds like a German symphony

HOWEVER
Last night I drove it back from the paint shop on 93 heading south from NH to Boston (lots of beeps from newer Porsches (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ) and found that the car started to buck and the engine runs rough when just a small amount of throttle is applied.

More Detail

If you are doing 55 and want to maintain that speed, it is necessary to apply a small amount of gas to sustain the speed. This is when the cars starts to exhibit this "miss/run-rough" puzzle. If more throttle is applied the bucking stops, the engine is smooth and all is well. Conversely, while de-accelerating there is no bucking.

This problem is NOT velocity-dependent, sustaining at 30/40/50/60 will exhibit the same reaction.


WHERE WOULD YOU START TO LOOK IF YOU HAD THIS CHALLENGE?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(20 - 29)
ctc911ctc
post Dec 17 2019, 08:51 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



Good point Jerry, that CHT caused me a lot of headaches when I first started the engine - swapped it out (it was stone dead) and my richness trouble subsided.

Will check the AFR once I get the bucking sorted.

On to the bucking gremlin!

Thank You!



QUOTE(Spoke @ Dec 17 2019, 03:42 PM) *

QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ Dec 17 2019, 02:55 PM) *

Will check next:
grounds
Fuel Pressure
Wiring to the ECU from the TPS (have done this before)
Trigger points and operation
Ignition system (complete)


Also check the CHT sender.

For overall operation of DJET, you should check the AFR although this requires installing an oxygen sensor in the exhaust. I did this on my 1.8L DJET when I first got it running. Turns out it was running very lean and I had to adjust the MPS.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Dec 18 2019, 06:15 AM
Post #22


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,937
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Dec 16 2019, 10:57 AM) *

I've experienced similar symptoms when the MPS was adjusted a bit too lean. At some areas in the fuel map it gets lean enough to cause slight misfire.

I wrote this precisely because of the bucking you are experiencing.
It is my contention that all you need to do is enrich the MPS setting a small amount to eliminate the misfire which results in bucking during light throttle cruise.
I bet you would also notice an increase in power at WOT.
Easy peasy.

If your MPS is not set up for in situ adjustability you can still open it up to make a change, and reassemble it in half an hour.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ctc911ctc
post Dec 18 2019, 09:39 AM
Post #23


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



Chris!

The muffler you sold me works and sounds great!

Great advice, I rebuilt the MPS as per your instructions and developed a method of 'relative relationships' to put it back together. Using the H method I was within a few percents of calibration.

I am going to check all of the basics and then PRIOR to going deeper will make this adjustment.

Question - if the ECU adjustment is turned to the RIGHT a click or two would this accomplish the same thing?

Thank You, Tangerine Chris!



QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Dec 18 2019, 07:15 AM) *

QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Dec 16 2019, 10:57 AM) *

I've experienced similar symptoms when the MPS was adjusted a bit too lean. At some areas in the fuel map it gets lean enough to cause slight misfire.

I wrote this precisely because of the bucking you are experiencing.
It is my contention that all you need to do is enrich the MPS setting a small amount to eliminate the misfire which results in bucking during light throttle cruise.
I bet you would also notice an increase in power at WOT.
Easy peasy.

If your MPS is not set up for in situ adjustability you can still open it up to make a change, and reassemble it in half an hour.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Dec 18 2019, 10:03 AM
Post #24


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,641
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



The ECU knob only affects the mixture at idle and not the mixture of the motor under load or at other rpm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Dec 18 2019, 10:38 AM
Post #25


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,937
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ Dec 18 2019, 10:39 AM) *


Question - if the ECU adjustment is turned to the RIGHT a click or two would this accomplish the same thing?


Brant is correct. And because the injection pulse is so short at idle the range of the ECU knob is quite narrow. In my experience when the MPS setting is near optimal the effect of the ECU knob will be more noticeable, and idle will be clearly better away from either extreme position.
I suggest that you back out the center screw in the MPS diaphragm by a turn and a half. Record the inductance values for comparison then install it in the car for a test drive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ctc911ctc
post Dec 18 2019, 02:09 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



Great advice Chris - Will DO!!!!!

QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Dec 18 2019, 11:38 AM) *

QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ Dec 18 2019, 10:39 AM) *


Question - if the ECU adjustment is turned to the RIGHT a click or two would this accomplish the same thing?


Brant is correct. And because the injection pulse is so short at idle the range of the ECU knob is quite narrow. In my experience when the MPS setting is near optimal the effect of the ECU knob will be more noticeable, and idle will be clearly better away from either extreme position.
I suggest that you back out the center screw in the MPS diaphragm by a turn and a half. Record the inductance values for comparison then install it in the car for a test drive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ctc911ctc
post Feb 4 2020, 12:43 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



*************Update**********

The bucking has Stopped! And the car runs great!

Chris,

You were correct, the MPS that I rebuilt must not be calibrated correctly (I used the H version of measurement and adjustment) since I swapped the one I rebuilt and cleaned and looks like new with the one I bought through eBay which is old and ugly but holds vacuum.

The old one installed stops the bucking, so as soon as I get my bench rebuilt I will put the one that I repaired back on the bench and get it tuned correctly.

THANK YOU CHRIS!






QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ Dec 18 2019, 03:09 PM) *

Great advice Chris - Will DO!!!!!

QUOTE(ChrisFoley @ Dec 18 2019, 11:38 AM) *

QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ Dec 18 2019, 10:39 AM) *


Question - if the ECU adjustment is turned to the RIGHT a click or two would this accomplish the same thing?


Brant is correct. And because the injection pulse is so short at idle the range of the ECU knob is quite narrow. In my experience when the MPS setting is near optimal the effect of the ECU knob will be more noticeable, and idle will be clearly better away from either extreme position.
I suggest that you back out the center screw in the MPS diaphragm by a turn and a half. Record the inductance values for comparison then install it in the car for a test drive.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjames
post Feb 4 2020, 02:33 PM
Post #28


I'm made of metal
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,971
Joined: 24-July 05
From: Shoreline, WA
Member No.: 4,467
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Glad you got it running well again!

And no disrespect to Chris, but I suggested that the MPS needed calibration several posts earlier. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bootyshake.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer3.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ctc911ctc
post Feb 4 2020, 05:44 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



OOOooooopppppsss,

Sorry!

My mistake (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif)



QUOTE(rjames @ Feb 4 2020, 03:33 PM) *

Glad you got it running well again!

And no disrespect to Chris, but I suggested that the MPS needed calibration several posts earlier. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bootyshake.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer3.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ctc911ctc
post Oct 2 2021, 10:27 AM
Post #30


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



UPDATE!


Bucking is back - very slight - I am going to adjust the MPS again as I had within this thread.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2024 - 12:16 PM