Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Chassis Number Irregularities ...
SirAndy
post Aug 13 2008, 02:05 PM
Post #1


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,679
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



I found quite a few Chassis Numbers lately that don't go with the factory CN decoding ...

Attached Image


For example:

4140050
This one has a 0 instead of the 9

0759607
This one is wrong for an early CN, as it has a 6 instead of a 5 and would also be wrong for a late CN unless they made 607 cars that day

4459616
Late Car, Build Date 10/75, wrong for a late CN unless they made 616 cars that day


All these examples are from pictures of the Karmann plates ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) Andy
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Aug 13 2008, 03:01 PM
Post #2


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,152
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



4140050 is a factory typo
0759607, 4459616 happens when they make more than 100 a day, this was quite common some times.

I found some examples of xxy92zz in the data. I'm not sure what to make of that as yet. I need the people to submit photos, and check the body stamping vs the Karmann badge.

The factory was not perfect, and many errors are known.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 13 2008, 07:27 PM
Post #3


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,679
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(davep @ Aug 13 2008, 01:01 PM) *

4459616 happens when they make more than 100 a day, this was quite common some times.


Huh? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

You're saying that they made 616 cars in one single day?
The total production number for '75 is 7924 cars, so 616 is roughly 8% ...

8% of the years production in one single day? if so, what were they doing for the other 350 days that year?
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/stirthepot.gif) Andy
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Aug 13 2008, 07:37 PM
Post #4


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,152
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



let us see that Karmann plate and give me the VIN also
I'd bet that 6 is really a 0.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sww914
post Aug 13 2008, 07:53 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,439
Joined: 4-June 06
Member No.: 6,146
Region Association: None



Maybe they made 616 plates that day and installed them as needed. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
plymouth37
post Aug 13 2008, 07:54 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,825
Joined: 24-May 05
From: Snoqualmie, WA
Member No.: 4,138
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I have a chassis # like that. Mine is a '73 and has a 96 in the number: 0159601, so I suppose this means that mine was # 101 for the day?
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Aug 13 2008, 08:07 PM
Post #7


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,152
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(plymouth37 @ Aug 13 2008, 05:54 PM) *

Mine is a '73 and has a 96 in the number: 0159601, does this mean that mine was # 101 for the day?

Yes indeed. A Friday build in the first week of January 1973. The body shop was pumping them out at that time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LowGT
post Aug 13 2008, 08:08 PM
Post #8


1.8 and Proud!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 2-October 05
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 4,904
Region Association: Southwest Region



I must be a real oddball then, I have a 5 in mine on a 74 1.8L. (0619534, sorry the four is hard to see.)

Attached Image

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jcd914
post Aug 13 2008, 08:10 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,081
Joined: 7-February 08
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 8,684
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(plymouth37 @ Aug 13 2008, 06:54 PM) *

I have a chassis # like that. Mine is a '73 and has a 96 in the number: 0159601, so I suppose this means that mine was # 101 for the day?
Attached Image

The 5 in the 3rd position means it was made on Friday.
After lunch (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer3.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer3.gif) on Friday all bets are off.
The 6 look like a 1 to Heinze (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Jim


User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Aug 13 2008, 08:23 PM
Post #10


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,152
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(LowGT @ Aug 13 2008, 06:08 PM) *

I must be a real oddball then, I have a 5 in mine on a 74 1.8L. (0619534, sorry the four is hard to see.)

No oddball, that is most common. Monday of the 6th week of 1974, 34th body that day. So mid February production, just prior to the beginning of LE production.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LowGT
post Aug 13 2008, 08:31 PM
Post #11


1.8 and Proud!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 2-October 05
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 4,904
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(davep @ Aug 13 2008, 09:23 PM) *

No oddball, that is most common. Monday of the 6th week of 1974, 34th body that day. So mid February production, just prior to the beginning of LE production.


I must have missed something in the previous replies then, what is the 5 for? Or is it just a typo like the 6 in previous replies?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
plymouth37
post Aug 13 2008, 08:34 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,825
Joined: 24-May 05
From: Snoqualmie, WA
Member No.: 4,138
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The 95 is supposed to be in the middle of the chassis number, except when there are more than 100 tubs made that day (like mine) when they used a 96 to eliminate duplicates. The 96 is not a typo, for example on early cars XXX9501 is the 1st car of the day while XXX9601 is the 101st car of the day.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LowGT
post Aug 13 2008, 08:41 PM
Post #13


1.8 and Proud!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 2-October 05
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 4,904
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(plymouth37 @ Aug 13 2008, 09:34 PM) *

The 95 is supposed to be in the middle of the chassis number, except when there are more than 100 tubs made that day (like mine) when they used a 96 to eliminate duplicates. The 96 is not a typo, for example on early cars XXX9501 is the 1st car of the day while XXX9601 is the 101st car of the day.



Ah, I got it now. Thanks for clearing that up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LowGT
post Aug 13 2008, 08:42 PM
Post #14


1.8 and Proud!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 2-October 05
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 4,904
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(davep @ Aug 13 2008, 04:01 PM) *


I found some examples of xxy92zz in the data. I'm not sure what to make of that as yet. I need the people to submit photos, and check the body stamping vs the Karmann badge.



Maybe a hungover German put the 5 die in upside-down. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drunk.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
michaelmoo
post Aug 15 2008, 05:45 AM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 312
Joined: 21-May 04
From: Kennesaw, GA
Member No.: 2,092



Ok i have a 74 1.8 and the chassis number is 0549548.
So if i get this right it is:
built the 5th week of 74 on a thursday at Karman and was the 48th body biult.

It has a 2/74 date on the vin, which vives with the chassis number. The vin is 4742914258. if i decode it the way people on the site say: 74=914-4, 4= 1974, 29= karman, 14258 is the build number? how can that be in February of 74? They on;y built 11,415 914's in 74? Or am i decoding it wrong? My Dad was the orig. owner so i know the VIN is correct. What am i missing?
Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KELTY360
post Aug 15 2008, 08:51 AM
Post #16


914 Neferati
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,036
Joined: 31-December 05
From: Pt. Townsend, WA
Member No.: 5,344
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(michaelmoo @ Aug 15 2008, 04:45 AM) *


They on;y built 11,415 914's in 74?



Did you take this number from the production numbers listed on this site? I believe those numbers refer to calendar year production, not model year. You would also need to add in the 2.0 production for the total number built.

I've been meaning to ask about that chart to confirm that it represents calendar year production.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
michaelmoo
post Aug 15 2008, 09:09 AM
Post #17


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 312
Joined: 21-May 04
From: Kennesaw, GA
Member No.: 2,092



AH yes i just used the 1.8 numbers. The total is 17012 which makes more sense. Kind of. Would a February car be number 14258? Seems like thats a high number for only 17012 cars built and about 7 more months left in the "car year" (dont they stop in September?)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gustl
post Aug 15 2008, 09:10 AM
Post #18


914 enthusiast & historian
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,524
Joined: 16-June 04
From: TIROL / Austria
Member No.: 2,212
Region Association: Austria



QUOTE(michaelmoo @ Aug 15 2008, 12:45 PM) *

Ok i have a 74 1.8 and the chassis number is 0549548.
So if i get this right it is:
built the 5th week of 74 on a thursday at Karman and was the 48th body biult.

It has a 2/74 date on the vin, which vives with the chassis number. The vin is 4742914258. if i decode it the way people on the site say: 74=914-4, 4= 1974, 29= karman, 14258 is the build number? how can that be in February of 74? They on;y built 11,415 914's in 74? Or am i decoding it wrong? My Dad was the orig. owner so i know the VIN is correct. What am i missing?
Mike


seems to be pretty clear to me:

0549548 => Tuesday Jan 31, 1974 - the 48th body
02/72 => car was completed in February 1974 - that's o.k. when the body was built on Jan 31

14258 - the VIN always relates to the MODEL YEAR, not calendar year
and the model year '74 started in August 1973 (!!!)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Gustl
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
michaelmoo
post Aug 15 2008, 09:31 AM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 312
Joined: 21-May 04
From: Kennesaw, GA
Member No.: 2,092



Thanks Gustl. I guess i wasn't starting in August... Now it makes much more sense. Thanks!!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KELTY360
post Aug 15 2008, 09:39 AM
Post #20


914 Neferati
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,036
Joined: 31-December 05
From: Pt. Townsend, WA
Member No.: 5,344
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(michaelmoo @ Aug 15 2008, 08:09 AM) *

AH yes i just used the 1.8 numbers. The total is 17012 which makes more sense. Kind of. Would a February car be number 14258? Seems like thats a high number for only 17012 cars built and about 7 more months left in the "car year" (dont they stop in September?)


Some of the '74 MY production is reflected in the '73 column. Note that there were 3903 1.8s produced in '73 yet no '73 914s had 1.8s.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 12:29 AM