|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Trevorg7 |
Jan 26 2007, 11:13 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,242 Joined: 7-December 04 From: Highland Village, TX Member No.: 3,241 Region Association: Southwest Region |
Side Shift only or is one for a Tail in the works?
T |
| Mid_Engine_914 |
Jan 26 2007, 11:19 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 195 Joined: 22-September 06 From: Left Coast Member No.: 6,888 |
I think I need one of those - what's it do exactly? My broken one.
|
| Chris Pincetich |
Jan 26 2007, 11:36 AM
Post
#23
|
|
B-) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,082 Joined: 3-October 05 From: Point Reyes Station, CA Member No.: 4,907 Region Association: Northern California |
Sweet. Nice boots! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
James talked about this in the Paddock a while back. I think Brumos had used a similar thing on all their race 914s - there were pics. The little solid rod slides in the big aluminum bracket with NO PLAY for more precise shifts under high Gs and chasis flex. Use the *Search* in the Paddock on 1st gear lock-out for the 3-4 page thread. Could a hollow shift rod be used - those things are heavy! |
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 11:46 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
I think I need one of those - what's it do exactly? Ah, it would work great with that broken one as the new support has its own bronze bushings and no longer uses that part of the casting. Side shift only. The advantage is that it is a true no-slop shift linkage. Due to the way that the side shift rods must angle as they rotate, just tightening up the stock bushings leads to binding unless they are hourglass shaped, and then they have a very small contact surface. This systems takes out all the binding in rear and supports the rod on both sides of the cup. The front (firewall) is taken care of by a nylon composite spherical bearing, allowing the off axis motion and low wear against the new chromoly shift tube. I will be selling the kit for about $460. There is some fabrication required. I did not want to force you to replace parts that you already have and drive the price up further. You will have to cut the solid portion from the front of your own shift rod where it attaches to the shift head and weld this to the new shift tube. It is not critical (+/- 1/4" or more in length and no rotational alignment needed), so it is easy to complete. I do not (at first) plan to supply the tube portion between the u-joints. This is the part that will be bent for a 4 cyl, straight for a 6 cyl, and longer for a V-8. Because the u-joints allow rotational re-alignment, this portion of the linkage is not as critical as the original design, so "close" is good enough in making this part, as long as it clears everything. |
| TROJANMAN |
Jan 26 2007, 11:47 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Looks nice in pictures......... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 5-March 04 From: Colorado Member No.: 1,753 Region Association: None |
very pretty......
The CSOB that I am, I may actually open my wallet for this one........... |
| Eric_Shea |
Jan 26 2007, 12:05 PM
Post
#26
|
|
PMB Performance ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 19,304 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
So, to answer my own question:
-6 = yes, depends on the rod not supplied. That rod must clear everything. As long as the tranny has the side shift consoule it should be good to go. Correct? |
| URY914 |
Jan 26 2007, 12:22 PM
Post
#27
|
|
I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 135,305 Joined: 3-February 03 From: Jacksonville, FL Member No.: 222 Region Association: None |
Does taking the slop out of the linkage relate to faster shifts???
With less grinding? |
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 12:22 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
So, to answer my own question: -6 = yes, depends on the rod not supplied. That rod must clear everything. As long as the tranny has the side shift consoule it should be good to go. Correct? Oops - trying to answer too many questions. Yes, a straight (or very close to it) tube (not supplied) will allow it to work with a /6 with side-shift. |
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 12:24 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
Does taking the slop out of the linkage relate to faster shifts??? With less grinding? If the grinding is due to worn synchros, then no. If it is due to missing the gear position, then yes. The shifts will be more repeatable - the servo syncros will still limit the speed of the shifts. |
| URY914 |
Jan 26 2007, 12:27 PM
Post
#30
|
|
I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 135,305 Joined: 3-February 03 From: Jacksonville, FL Member No.: 222 Region Association: None |
Does taking the slop out of the linkage relate to faster shifts??? With less grinding? If the grinding is due to worn synchros, then no. If it is due to missing the gear position, then yes. The shifts will be more repeatable - the servo syncros will still limit the speed of the shifts. I would think it would have to help in someway. I'm on board, gooooood work!! |
| 914werke |
Jan 26 2007, 01:09 PM
Post
#31
|
|
"I got blisters on me fingers" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,785 Joined: 22-March 03 From: USofA Member No.: 453 Region Association: Pacific Northwest
|
Does taking the slop out of the linkage relate to faster shifts??? With less grinding? If the grinding is due to worn synchros, then no. If it is due to missing the gear position, then yes. The shifts will be more repeatable - the servo syncros will still limit the speed of the shifts. Wouldnt the application of your Rennshifter alrady address this? |
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 01:41 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
Does taking the slop out of the linkage relate to faster shifts??? With less grinding? If the grinding is due to worn synchros, then no. If it is due to missing the gear position, then yes. The shifts will be more repeatable - the servo syncros will still limit the speed of the shifts. Wouldnt the application of your Rennshifter alrady address this? The RennShift addresses all it can from the shifter (which is the biggest gain) and also adds the spring gating and reduced throw, but there is still something to be gained in the connection between the shifter and the transmission. |
| soloracer |
Jan 26 2007, 01:46 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 793 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Calgary Member No.: 538 |
James: Looks awesome! However, I bought the shift rod kit from Patrick Motorsports last year. I wish now that I had held off buying the Patrick Motorsports kit as I also purchased a Rennshifter and I much prefer to stay with products from one supplier that are engineered to work together. How does your kit differ from the Patrick Motorsports kit?
|
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 03:56 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
James: Looks awesome! However, I bought the shift rod kit from Patrick Motorsports last year. I wish now that I had held off buying the Patrick Motorsports kit as I also purchased a Rennshifter and I much prefer to stay with products from one supplier that are engineered to work together. How does your kit differ from the Patrick Motorsports kit? My firewall setup is the only one that offers a no-bind bearing with appropriate materials to last a lifetime and a boot to keep everything clean. The only way to prevent bind in the rear rod is to separate the rear from the front using two u-joints. This require the additional rear support at the console. |
| rhodyguy |
Jan 26 2007, 04:31 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 22,254 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
does the stock, late type rod boot at the firewall work?
k |
| JWest |
Jan 26 2007, 04:33 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
|
| rhodyguy |
Jan 26 2007, 04:40 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 22,254 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
if this is a *fix* for the guys that have to run no boot at all due to a side shift coversion, that's a BIG bonus. nice product james.
k |
| Aaron Cox |
Jan 26 2007, 05:38 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Professional Tinkerer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,548 Joined: 1-February 03 From: Corona, CA Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
wow! very cool stuff!!!
any firewall to trans full installation shots (with and without covers)? very cool. thanks for bringing more products to the market... and if its anything like your rennshifts... it will be A+ |
| SirAndy |
Jan 26 2007, 05:50 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Resident German ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 42,562 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
james, quick question:
when will this be available? (might have missed this reading through this thread) i'm asking because i still need to make a custom shift rod for my /6 conversion and if yours is available soon, i'd rather buy a complete assembly from you ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) Andy |
| Gint |
Jan 26 2007, 06:47 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,113 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th November 2026 - 03:18 PM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |