Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> WOT: Jets at she pretty, we got pistons already
6freak
post Dec 18 2009, 04:12 PM
Post #1


MR.C
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,740
Joined: 19-March 08
From: Tacoma WA
Member No.: 8,829
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Attached Image

first flight and of course landing
she `s BIG

Note the shark tooth nacell(engine cowl)..and the flex in the wings
the new 747-8 wings will flex even more
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Dec 18 2009, 04:32 PM
Post #2


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



i saw it take off. man that thing is quiet once it gets in the air. and it must have some big hp. look at the size of the engines!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
number6
post Dec 18 2009, 05:21 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 14-September 08
From: portland, or
Member No.: 9,546
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



What is that plane in the background?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Dec 18 2009, 05:40 PM
Post #4


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



The chase plane looks like a Lockheed P-80 "Shooting Star". Military type in early Korea Conflict (no, it wasn't a war ... the gubermint said so). Original design circa 1945.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Drums66
post Dec 18 2009, 05:50 PM
Post #5


914 Rudiments
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,321
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Coronado,Cali
Member No.: 151
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(number6 @ Dec 18 2009, 03:21 PM) *

What is that plane in the background?



914-S
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Dec 18 2009, 06:27 PM
Post #6


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Dang, those wings flex more than the B-52...

So did they did fix the wing root problem???

I know that when the wings were flexed for the first time, a spar or two let go... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

Not a good match for TATA's FEA....

TATA, gotta love em'.... Indians taking American work and delivering crap.....

Over and over and over again....

Yup F-80/ T-34 / F-94 derivitive flying behind....

Dad flew those until they began augering in from the skies.. I saw a couple come crashing in as a kid and remember the Air Force wives running out of the homes to look at the fireball and smoke plumes..... All had a worried look on their faces....

I remember Mom convincing Dad to get outa fighters at that time......

KennyburnedbyTATAsomanytimes..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sleepin
post Dec 18 2009, 06:36 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,647
Joined: 20-November 07
From: Grand Junction, Co.
Member No.: 8,357
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(SLITS @ Dec 18 2009, 04:40 PM) *

The chase plane looks like a Lockheed P-80 "Shooting Star". Military type in early Korea Conflict (no, it wasn't a war ... the gubermint said so). Original design circa 1945.


A lot more new fangled than those prop-jobbies you used to fly in the Great War! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stirthepot.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmill
post Dec 18 2009, 06:36 PM
Post #8


Green Hornet
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,449
Joined: 9-May 08
From: Racine, Wisconsin
Member No.: 9,038
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Tell me Boeing isn't going the way Airbus did. Them composite planes are like Bic lighters. When they're broke you throw them over your shoulder and buy a new one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Dec 18 2009, 06:40 PM
Post #9


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Sleepin @ Dec 18 2009, 04:36 PM) *

QUOTE(SLITS @ Dec 18 2009, 04:40 PM) *

The chase plane looks like a Lockheed P-80 "Shooting Star". Military type in early Korea Conflict (no, it wasn't a war ... the gubermint said so). Original design circa 1945.


A lot more new fangled than those prop-jobbies you used to fly in the Great War! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stirthepot.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)


Nothing like a fan up front to keep the pilot cool Ricky. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Dec 18 2009, 06:43 PM
Post #10


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



If they ever make a nickel on those 787s they've sold as of now (800+), I'll be amazed. That program is the most mis-managed clusterfuck in the history of Boeing. All the suits that made the mess are either still in place, kicked upstairs, or floating under a golden parachute......oh, and still looking to put the blame elsewhere.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Dec 18 2009, 06:45 PM
Post #11


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



The literal flexibility is amazing....

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Dec 18 2009, 07:05 PM
Post #12


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jmill @ Dec 18 2009, 04:36 PM) *

Tell me Boeing isn't going the way Airbus did. Them composite planes are like Bic lighters. When they're broke you throw them over your shoulder and buy a new one.


I ain't gonna try. Airbus has show the way to disposable airplanes and the customers have responded ( it remains to be seen if the USAF will go for it). The days of building B52s or 707s that last for 50 (or more ) years are over.
I've been told that Scare Bus doesn't shot peen anything. That may mean something to some here.

BTW, properly maintianed, carbon fiber last forever....maybe longer.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drgchapman
post Dec 18 2009, 07:22 PM
Post #13


Current Stable
***

Group: NoClassifiedAccess
Posts: 922
Joined: 20-September 04
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 2,789
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I expected to see the wing tiplets, what about the vortex issues at the tips?
Flexiflyer!

JP: I hate Airbus planes, flown on a few, feel cheap and uncomfortable.
Scarebus... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
6freak
post Dec 18 2009, 08:37 PM
Post #14


MR.C
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,740
Joined: 19-March 08
From: Tacoma WA
Member No.: 8,829
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(messix @ Dec 18 2009, 02:32 PM) *

i saw it take off. man that thing is quiet once it gets in the air. and it must have some big hp. look at the size of the engines!

I stood inside the cowl and could not touch the top,I needed another 4 feet or more its very close to a 777 and thats 14feet inside

No winglets !not in the design ..as much as they flex you dont need winglets look at the right wing all the way out on the end ..ps there a 737under that wing you can just see the tail,,they just keep the wing from flapping like a bird and that saved fuel as well ..Boeing only started putting those on maybe 5 years back...737 has 6' winglets, 747 has 6' winglets go figure

I dont know if they(Airbus) shotpeen J.P ...none on this aircraft! all other Boeing aircraft wingskins and some of the double plus cords,spars did as well! as far as $ Its gonna take some years to make said nickel....first one going to All Nippon Airlines late 2010 lets hope

.Airbus is not composite Mr Jmill this is a first..hence making history

trying 737 composite next 737-1000

18feet of wing flex AFAIK

yes wing issue solved or there would have been no flight...sub contracted wingbox to body. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif) ...AKA gas tank! yes your setting on the tanks (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

Chase plane is indeed a t-38 and the photo was taken by the other t-38 .....34 or 38 I think 38..could be wrong ..i will verify

Flex you ant seen nutt`n yet what tell she`s fully load with fuel and people with luggage in this photo she`s low on fuel with just some computer equipment inside


One more little side note ...remember the Boeing(old plane) 309 that crashed into Union Bay(Seattle) maybe 4-5 years back "ran out of fuel"....SAME PILOT (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) there was some jokes fly`n,,, no pun intended (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davesprinkle
post Dec 18 2009, 09:18 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 2,943
Region Association: None



T-33


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davesprinkle
post Dec 18 2009, 09:19 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 2,943
Region Association: None



T-38


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davesprinkle
post Dec 18 2009, 09:21 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 2,943
Region Association: None



The question ISN'T:
What kind of chase plane did they use?

The question IS:
WTF were they doing using a vintage jet trainer from the 50s?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Dec 18 2009, 11:20 PM
Post #18


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



QUOTE(6freak @ Dec 18 2009, 06:37 PM) *



I dont know if they(Airbus) shotpeen J.P ...none on this aircraft! all other Boeing aircraft wingskins and some of the double plus cords,spars did as well! as far as $ Its gonna take some years to make said nickel....first one going to All Nippon




There is a lot of shot peened titanium on that airplane. I've had my grubby mitts all over em'.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Krank
post Dec 18 2009, 11:40 PM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 11-October 09
From: Winnipeg, MB
Member No.: 10,922
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(davesprinkle @ Dec 18 2009, 09:18 PM) *

T-33



EH!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elliot Cannon
post Dec 19 2009, 12:02 AM
Post #20


914 Guru
*****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 8,487
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast)
Member No.: 7,407
Region Association: None



NOT ENOUGH MOTORS.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 03:28 PM