Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Raised Strut Spindle vs ERP Bump Steer Kit, same cost which is more useful?
kdfoust
post May 27 2003, 10:16 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 694
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Riverside
Member No.: 71
Region Association: Southern California



So I'm already hemoraging money all over the suspension bits of my car. Why stop the bleeding so soon when there are so many parts to buy... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)

When the car goes back together I'm lowering it as far as practical for an AX/street ride (my driveway may be the ultimate constraint). I've already experienced the near complete elimination of bump steer by installing washers under the steering rack so I never want to put up with bump steer again. So I'm looking at my options and see two. The first is to install a ERP bump steer kit (hit page down a couple of times to find it) so I can dial out the bump steer no matter where the ride height is set. The second option is to go to the Tangerine racing raised strut spindleswhich appear, looking at the digipic, to have the control arm bent to a corrected position to eliminate bump steer while resetting the ride height via the relocated spindle. I suppose the raised spindle also has the advantage of not using any of your suspension travel to achieve the lower chassis height.

Whata ya think? The price is a wash. Anybody done both or one or the other to provide and comparison/comments? Oh this all assumes that the dreaded bump steer will show up with a vengance as I crank the car lower...

Thanks,
Kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
campbellcj
post May 27 2003, 10:52 PM
Post #2


I can't Re Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,547
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Agoura, CA
Member No.: 21
Region Association: Southern California



I think these two things serve different purposes -- the bump steer kit allows fine-tuning to negate bump steer effects on the front end geometry, whereas the raised strut spindles allow you to get back some suspension/shock travel when lowering the front end significantly (I think 17-21mm is a typical range of travel recovered).

I will most likely be doing both mods this summer and of course will take pics and report any findings (good or bad).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post May 27 2003, 11:00 PM
Post #3


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,934
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



Without raising the spindles there are two limitations other than bump steer to how low you can go. Both affect cornering limits. The first is bottoming the shock, which will cause a sudden increase in spring rate and potential loss of control, and could damage the shock if bump rubbers aren't installed. The second is that the camber change is altered when the a-arm is angled upward. This adversely affects the tire contact patch.
Raising the spindles improves both of these conditions.

Yes, when I raise the spindles I also re-curve the steering arm so the tie rod end is in the same relationship to the steering rack as before. This has the added benefit of slightly increasing the steering rate, due to the effective length of the steering arm being shortened.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 28 2003, 09:49 AM
Post #4


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



The raised strut is the hot ticket... BUT..BUT.. if your thinking about 5 lug later I wouldnt do it. Hold off until you convert the car (I dont recall if your car is already 5 lug or not).

The ERP/Smart bumpsteer kit awesome. It really lets you fine tune the bump for your car.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kdfoust
post May 28 2003, 01:47 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 694
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Riverside
Member No.: 71
Region Association: Southern California



I'm a 4 lug guy. I don't have any plans to go 5 with this car.

I think what I'm gonna do is put 'er back together and set the ride height were it's going to be, check the bump steer and talk to Chris about the raised spindle position (It'd be pretty cool if he does custom spindle positions). I really like the idea of having full strut travel AND lower ride height.

Thanks!
Kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 28 2003, 02:38 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



He can do it (as well as others) Its a lot of work to raise a 4 lug strut.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post May 28 2003, 02:41 PM
Post #7


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,082
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



How is the 4 lug strut different than a 5 lug for the purpose of raising the spindle?

Or, why is it more difficult?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 28 2003, 02:45 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



You cant raise the spindle on a 4cyl strut or a early 5 lug strut. The strut is tapered.

SC/Carrera/Bilstein/Koni/Boge are not tapered and the spindle can be raised without "major" hassle like the 914 strut.

You have to cut the strut in two places... instead of just moving the spindle up.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 28 2003, 02:48 PM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Whatever he adds to the bottom (raise spindle) has to be removed from the top yet still retain your threaded collar "threads".


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 28 2003, 02:50 PM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Nice Berber carpet Chris...LOL


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post May 28 2003, 03:00 PM
Post #11


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,082
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Got it. Now that I've asked the question I vaguely recall a similar thread not too long ago.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post May 28 2003, 07:59 PM
Post #12


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,934
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ May 28 2003, 12:50 PM)
Nice Berber carpet Chris...LOL


B

That's the left over from doing my sister in law's condo. It covers the stained carpet in my basement office until we install new stuff here.

I can set the spindle height wherever you want it. It's really important to check the clearance between your ball joint collar and the wheel so they will fit after modifying. I use a piece of DOM roll cage tubing for the insert piece at the bottom, instead of re-using the cut out piece from the top. The result is better that way.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post May 29 2003, 10:19 AM
Post #13


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,119
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE
You cant raise the spindle on a 4cyl strut or a early 5 lug strut. The strut is tapered.

SC/Carrera/Bilstein/Koni/Boge are not tapered and the spindle can be raised without "major" hassle like the 914 strut.

You have to cut the strut in two places... instead of just moving the spindle up.


So Brad, if Ive got this straight on the SC/Carrera struts you just break the welds from the spindle casting to the strut housing and slide it up then re-weld?

Couldnt you the get a little more creative after cutting those welds and machine threads in the Strut housing and on the ID of the spindle casting use a couple of lock and jam nuts and have a Adj. assmbely?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 29 2003, 10:25 AM
Post #14


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Rich,

I could do that.. but its way cheaper to build a little ledge above the spindle and set a threaded aluminum collar down on it for a cheapy coil over conversion. The threaded collars and aluminum setup runs about 100$

Koni Converted:

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post May 29 2003, 10:36 AM
Post #15


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,119
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Ok so this is getting a liittle OT, but please excuse the dumb Q?

What is the purpose of front coil-overs? if you have a gas preasureized strut insert * and torsion bar * and anti-sway bar that provide compression/rebound forces working in concert to keep the tires on the pavement, isnt the addition of a sprint overlapping one or many of those elements?
And adding weight?
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post May 29 2003, 10:39 AM
Post #16


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,082
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I would think the torsion bars that would be removed would weigh pretty close to the weight of the additional springs.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 29 2003, 10:39 AM
Post #17


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Yes to everything... but.. The largest torsion bar I can possibly fit in a 914 or 911 control arm is 26mm. What if I need something bigger ?? I have to go to coil overs.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 29 2003, 10:41 AM
Post #18


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Oh.. Rich.

We remove the torsion bars.. NOBODY runs a torsion bar AND coil overs (at least not on purpose)

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TMorr
post May 29 2003, 02:09 PM
Post #19


Tracey of Windrush
**

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 28-January 03
From: San Carlos, CA USA
Member No.: 205



I believe the factory ran Torsion bars and coil springs together in the 911 RSR, early 70's.
It was a homologation stunt to circumvent having to keep the original spring medium as homologated, not sure of the specifics, but it has been done.

Raising the spindles also has a positive effect on restoring some height to the front roll center which is adversely effected by lowering the car, also exacerbated by larger Ø wheels & or tires, which fortunately allow additional space inside the rim to raise the spindle to recover....

Hayden PTBT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post May 29 2003, 02:46 PM
Post #20


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,119
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Ok makes sense. but what holds the A arms in place w/o the T-bars? never mind.... Im not likley to be running coilovers, my thought of threading the bodies was simply to address the lowering of the car w/o the cutting and rewelding of the strut tubes.
Seemed simpler to me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 10:39 PM