 -6 hard oil line union, Size difference between smaller -6s and larger -6s? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
  |
| db9146 |
 Aug 23 2017, 05:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Members Posts: 953 Joined: 21-December 04 From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 3,315 Region Association: None 
 |
I've found out that the oil hard line union on the cyl. 1-3 side of the case for a '70 2.0L -6 is a smaller size than the same fitting on the side of a larger -6 (2.7 up).
 The number for the union on the 2.0L -6 is 900.136.013.02 while the same "Connection Piece" (Porsche's description) for the 1974 2.7L up is 999.136.008.09. Rather than looking for an adapter, I guess I'm going to pull the one off the 2.0L and see if it fits the opening in the case of the 2.7S. Are there other solutions that have been validated? |
   |
 
|
| mb911 |
Aug 23 2017, 05:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 6,871 Joined: 2-January 09 From: Burlington wi Member No.: 9,892 Region Association: Upper MidWest
|
QUOTE(db9146 @ Aug 23 2017, 03:03 PM)  I've found out that the oil hard line union on the cyl. 1-3 side of the case for a '70 2.0L -6 is a smaller size than the same fitting on the side of a larger -6 (2.7 up). The number for the union on the 2.0L -6 is 900.136.013.02 while the same "Connection Piece" (Porsche's description) for the 1974 2.7L up is 999.136.008.09. Rather than looking for an adapter, I guess I'm going to pull the one off the 2.0L and see if it fits the opening in the case of the 2.7S. Are there other solutions that have been validated? They only make 1 hard line but the fittings do differ. I have a bunch of the smaller fittings if you need one and they won't hurt the engine Becuase of oil bypass mod. |
|
|
|
| db9146 |
Aug 23 2017, 05:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 953 Joined: 21-December 04 From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 3,315 Region Association: None
|
Thanks for the offer Ben but never mind....worked like a charm! Guess I should have tried it before I posted I just wasn't expecting it to work. That they would have gone to a larger fitting for a reason.....oh well.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
| Mark Henry |
Aug 23 2017, 07:26 PM
Post
#4
|
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
There's a choke down on both ends, case and the tank, a larger line isn't going to increase the flow one bit.
The stock line is almost dead on -10 size. |
|
|
|
| Larmo63 |
Aug 23 2017, 07:46 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,264 Joined: 3-March 14 From: San Clemente, Ca Member No.: 17,068 Region Association: Southern California |
Patrick Motorsports sells the bigger one....
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 12:28 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.