Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bus and 914 engine difference
cal44
post Sep 24 2017, 11:37 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 8-October 09
From: Encinitas, Ca.
Member No.: 10,910
Region Association: Southwest Region



Lads,
Not being fully versed on everything VW, I was curious if the a 2.0 Bus engine and a 2.0 914 engine are the same......Or, will a Bus 2.0 bolt right into a 914. Air cooled of course.

Also 1.7 and 1.8 while you are at it.

Thanks bunch.

Mike

Sarcastic remarks welcome, I like the humor
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Sep 24 2017, 12:13 PM
Post #2


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



The cases are similar but not exactly the same and the internals are somewhat different.

The bus engine is build to give a lot of low end torque to haul around 5000+ pounds, it won't rev past 4k rpm and makes no power at those rpms.

You can put one of those in a 914 but i'm pretty sure you wouldn't like it ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tomh
post Sep 24 2017, 01:03 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 322
Joined: 28-February 10
From: san jose
Member No.: 11,412
Region Association: None



I test drove one last year with a bus 2.0 and it performed worse than any 1.7 I've ever had.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Sep 24 2017, 01:16 PM
Post #4


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,585
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



The oil dipstick is in a different location
The heads have smaller valves and hydraulic lifters
The crank is the same
Lower compression dished pistons
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mmichalik
post Sep 24 2017, 01:47 PM
Post #5


MikeM
***

Group: Members
Posts: 700
Joined: 27-January 16
From: Valley Center, CA
Member No.: 19,600
Region Association: Southern California



The 914 2.0 also has a windage tray in the oilpan that the bus 2.0 does not. (if memory serves correctly)

Someone correct me if I'm wrong though....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post Sep 24 2017, 02:09 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,703
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



Bus motors work very hard,run hot and are more prone to dropping exhaust valves for that reason,all comments on the performance are correct,the saving in buying these motors is soon used up to get them to work,914 motors are still fairly cheap to buy .
I read somewhere the cases more often need line boring ,haven't seen this myself however.
I have a stock 1.8 bus ROW motor it has the larger valve heads and higher compression pistons, electronic ignition, twin Weber DCNVA's and freeflow exhaust,runs very well and makes pretty good power,the US motors were hampered by decreased valve size,small ports and low compression.
Not saying it can't be done but is it worth it ??

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cal44
post Sep 24 2017, 02:10 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 8-October 09
From: Encinitas, Ca.
Member No.: 10,910
Region Association: Southwest Region



I'm a bit of a numbskull. What I should have written was, as an example, would a 2.0 block from a bus bolt directly in a 914. But, I think youz guys answered the question. Dip stick is in different location?
And I reckon somewhere on the block (using a 2.0 as the example) there is an I.D to indicate its use for a 914.

I remember the GA and three bolts on heads but don't recall the block I.D.
My reason for asking is, there are always folks selling related items on CL, I don't want to make a bonehead mistake.

I'm trying to ease back into 914's (it's been a long time) as I have been away into the early Boss 302's, Tigers and 911's.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Sep 24 2017, 02:58 PM
Post #8


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,991
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The Bus has a filler and dipstick that go into a funnel bolted onto the front-right corner (914 engine orientation) of the case. The Bus also doesn't have the dipstick tube on the top. On some later Bus cases, the oil filler tower is cast over solid.

Those are the primary difference in the cases, as far as I know. You can block off the hole in the case where the Bus filler and dipstick go, drill a hole and add the top dipstick, and if the tower is cast over you can machine it off and use the 914 filler assembly.

But it's usually a lot easier to use a 914 case. Or one of the VW applications that has the top filler and dipstick--there are some.

The 914 cases have engine numbers that start with W, EA, EB, EC, GA, GB, or GC. The GA/GB/GC (these are the 2.0 engines) numbers would be found in front of the oil filler. The other 914 engine numbers would be found on a boss on top of the case on the right side near the flywheel end.

Note that some of the VW cases have non-GA/GB/GC numbers in front of the oil filler tower.

Also note that W, EA, EB, and EC were also used in some non-914 applications. GA, GB, and GC were only used in 914s.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
barefoot
post Sep 25 2017, 07:40 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,279
Joined: 19-March 13
From: Charleston SC
Member No.: 15,673
Region Association: South East States



When i got my 76, it had already been few at least one engine rebuild, it was a correct 2.0L GC code block but was equipped with 022-101-372G bus heads with smaller 48cc chambers. Later I acquired a GA code 2.0L motor with the proper 039-101-371A large valve heads but has larger 60cc chambers.
If you want high compression and smaller valve sizes, the bus heads will do that for you
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Sep 25 2017, 07:56 AM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



I'm still not sure if you're looking to buy a running motor to install, or a core engine to build something.

If you're looking for a running motor, anything Type4 will work with some modest changes. The bus/411 flywheel is different, the mounts will have to be swapped with 914 components, etc. Do-able, not terribly difficult either.

If you're looking for a core engine for a build project, get a non-bus case. You can convert the dipstick and oil filler, but 1.7 or 1.8 core engines can be found for cheap still and I've found if you can't start your engine build with a 914 2.0 core, then ignore the other engines/cars and find any 914 engine of any size as your starting point.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
flmont
post Sep 26 2017, 09:56 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 879
Joined: 21-October 08
From: Tucson,Az
Member No.: 9,676
Region Association: Southwest Region



To completely change the topic (although a little related),..why can a type 1, 2 or 3 VW engine create such strong and reliable HP and TQ numbers when the type 4 supposedly cant ??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
falcor75
post Sep 26 2017, 10:24 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,579
Joined: 22-November 12
From: Sweden
Member No.: 15,176
Region Association: Scandinavia



QUOTE(flmont @ Sep 27 2017, 05:56 AM) *

To completely change the topic (although a little related),..why can a type 1, 2 or 3 VW engine create such strong and reliable HP and TQ numbers when the type 4 supposedly cant ??


The type 4 can be built to give any hp number you want. But because there are so few willing to pay the cost you dont see it done by companies because there isnt a huge market for it.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Sep 27 2017, 06:19 AM
Post #13


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



They have a better exhaust port design.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DM_2000
post Sep 27 2017, 02:24 PM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 217
Joined: 16-August 17
From: PA
Member No.: 21,351
Region Association: None



Then the next question is, why not go to a T1 engine with T3 cooling fan?

From what I recall the limiting factor with the T1 was engine case strength. There are now aftermarket cases eliminating that issue.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
flmont
post Sep 27 2017, 09:07 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 879
Joined: 21-October 08
From: Tucson,Az
Member No.: 9,676
Region Association: Southwest Region



Oh, researching what to do with my car a couple years back,either stroke the 4 or go water pumper,..I ran across all those crazy built VW's and thought why cant I build a type whatever engine but its also said the fitment can be a issue.maybe my other 914 could go type 3 or something ??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Sep 28 2017, 06:22 AM
Post #16


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Honestly, I can't believe that nobody's put a T1 into a 914 before. Well, I'm SURE it's been done. I guess I can't believe it's not done more.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 28 2017, 09:40 AM
Post #17


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,677
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



My understanding it's the T2 with the dual relief case you want to build. I had one built a long time ago when I snapped the crank on my 66 912. It put out way more power and was quite reliable at least for the year I had it running.

The cooling housing and exhaust ports are the issues. They are cheaper to build, but you are going to have to do some modifications to make it work.

Mark
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DM_2000
post Sep 28 2017, 06:15 PM
Post #18


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 217
Joined: 16-August 17
From: PA
Member No.: 21,351
Region Association: None



The T2 case will have 3 bosses around the oil pump for the engine mount. If a regular case is used, an adapter would be needed.

The 2X relief is based on year not type.

The type 3 motor has a cooling fan setup like a T4 .

Cooling tin for any of these motors would need to be extended so it seals to the 914 body. This is critical to prevent hot air from recirculating into the engine compartment.

I just looked at a 2056 , 2270 and 2563 engine kit that includes everything except a block / tin / cooling / ignition / fuel . These are $ 9,400 to $ 9,800 for 120 to 190 HP, I don't know what a T1 will cost to build but is has to be way less these days.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Sep 29 2017, 07:33 AM
Post #19


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,585
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(McMark @ Sep 28 2017, 08:22 AM) *

Honestly, I can't believe that nobody's put a T1 into a 914 before. Well, I'm SURE it's been done. I guess I can't believe it's not done more.

I agree!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DM_2000
post Sep 29 2017, 05:06 PM
Post #20


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 217
Joined: 16-August 17
From: PA
Member No.: 21,351
Region Association: None



T1 into early 912

http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=32894

There were also some threads about a Porsche trans in a T1 Bug that I can find again at the moment.

A T4 capable manual trans has a longer pilot on the input shaft than the T1, this would need to be addressed.

Summit is showing fully assembled long block zero mile 2275 and 2332 T1 engines for $ 3,300 and $ 3,400, ( This is less tin, cooling , flywheel / clutch, fuel , ignition ) I didn't look at HP though.

Engine kits are here. http://www.scatvw.com/engine-kits ( $ 3,000 )

Nitrided chromoly forged crankshaft
NEW SCAT forged H-Beam rods (Chevy or VW journal)
NEW Stroker AS41 dual by-pass engine case
NEW ‘D Port’ polished dual-port heads
NEW 3/8″ cut to length chromoly pushrods

NEW Crankshaft Gear Assembly Kit #10207
NEW 40-piece Engine Lock Nut Kit #10173
NEW Universal Engine Case Hardware Kit # 10205
NEW SCAT adjustable O-Ring aluminum pushrod tubes
NEW 4140 chromoly 8mm dual-port cylinder/head stud kit


http://www.scatvw.com/engine-kits
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 05:31 PM