![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Dutchy914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 4-July 21 From: Texas Member No.: 25,696 Region Association: Southwest Region ![]() |
My 914, built 1974
inside my brake dust cover it says 07.5.74 because some 914's are destined for Europe and some for USA in Europe it would mean 7 May 1974 in USA it would mean July 5 1974 Which one is it ? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) ![]() |
Dutchy914 |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 4-July 21 From: Texas Member No.: 25,696 Region Association: Southwest Region ![]() |
BTW VIN# 4742918977
|
StarBear |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,120 Joined: 2-September 09 From: NJ Member No.: 10,753 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
The door jam sticker is best though that vin date can be deciphered. @wonkipop ? @jeffbowlsby ?
|
GregAmy |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,490 Joined: 22-February 13 From: Middletown CT Member No.: 15,565 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
That's the part manufacturing date, not the vehicle assembly date.
Probably May 1974, given there's no need to distinguish "05" from "15" in a month designation. However, there is a need to distinguish the 7, 17, and 27 day of the month. |
SirAndy |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Resident German ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 42,206 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California ![]() |
I have no reason to believe a German company would put an American date format on the back of a brake dust shield.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) |
73-914 |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 616 Joined: 24-April 10 From: Albany UpstateNY Member No.: 11,651 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I have no reason to believe a German company would put an American date format on the back of a brake dust shield. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) + all measurements are in METRIC |
wonkipop |
![]()
Post
#7
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,757 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
i believe mericans are unique in the world in putting month first and day second in date protocol. but could be wrong.
think the germans do it like the rest of us. day first, month second. sir andy is german, right.....so he'd know and he is saying its rest of world way. one of the cars in our 1.8 engine survey had vin 18255. it was a may 74 car. not a july car. i have a jan 74 car, karman stamped 25th jan. when i recommissioned it found the front struts still had date stamps like that dust guard you posted. the date stamps on the strut were 11 jan 74. |
wonkipop |
![]()
Post
#8
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,757 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
|
JeffBowlsby |
![]()
Post
#9
|
914 Wiring Harnesses & Beekeeper ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,907 Joined: 7-January 03 From: San Ramon CA Member No.: 104 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Consider that at ~50 years old now, only the most original examples of our cars would still have accurately date coded original parts.
|
74ravenna |
![]()
Post
#10
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 472 Joined: 19-October 14 From: nh Member No.: 18,032 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
I'm pretty sure the date stamped on the dust shields is the Car Build Date not the Part Manufacture Date. My dust shield is stamped with the date that matches the build date in my trunk.
I can't imagine they manufactured my dust shields on the same day that they built my car. Regards ![]() |
TheCabinetmaker |
![]()
Post
#11
|
I drive my car everyday ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,336 Joined: 8-May 03 From: Tulsa, Ok. Member No.: 666 ![]() |
i believe mericans are unique in the world in putting month first and day second in date protocol. but could be wrong. think the germans do it like the rest of us. day first, month second. sir andy is german, right.....so he'd know and he is saying its rest of world way. one of the cars in our 1.8 engine survey had vin 18255. it was a may 74 car. not a july car. i have a jan 74 car, karman stamped 26th jan. when i recommissioned it found the front struts still had date stamps like that dust guard you posted. the date stamps on the strut were 11 jan 74. The US military uses day/month/year. They also run on zulu(gmt) time |
wonkipop |
![]()
Post
#12
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,757 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
I'm pretty sure the date stamped on the dust shields is the Car Build Date not the Part Manufacture Date. My dust shield is stamped with the date that matches the build date in my trunk. I can't imagine they manufactured my dust shields on the same day that they built my car. Regards ![]() my strut is 3 days before the k # stamp. so not quite the same time as the body stamp. close but not exactly the same. also to consider. true manufacture time for the car would have been over more than 1 day. i think the k# is the day the body shell commences or is completed. |
wonkipop |
![]()
Post
#13
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,757 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
i believe mericans are unique in the world in putting month first and day second in date protocol. but could be wrong. think the germans do it like the rest of us. day first, month second. sir andy is german, right.....so he'd know and he is saying its rest of world way. one of the cars in our 1.8 engine survey had vin 18255. it was a may 74 car. not a july car. i have a jan 74 car, karman stamped 26th jan. when i recommissioned it found the front struts still had date stamps like that dust guard you posted. the date stamps on the strut were 11 jan 74. The US military uses day/month/year. They also run on zulu(gmt) time good to now. sensible - why confuse allies. |
74ravenna |
![]()
Post
#14
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 472 Joined: 19-October 14 From: nh Member No.: 18,032 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
I'm pretty sure the date stamped on the dust shields is the Car Build Date not the Part Manufacture Date. My dust shield is stamped with the date that matches the build date in my trunk. I can't imagine they manufactured my dust shields on the same day that they built my car. Regards ![]() my strut is 3 days before the k # stamp. so not quite the same time as the body stamp. close but not exactly the same. also to consider. true manufacture time for the car would have been over more than 1 day. i think the k# is the day the body shell commences or is completed. You make a good point. I've always wondered when they stamped the build date into the trunk. It would be before paint is applied I suppose. So maybe as you state above it could be on the day the build commences. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 05:23 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |