Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Horsepower for the Porsche Sixes?
Scott Carlberg
post Apr 8 2004, 07:32 PM
Post #1


Porsche MOTORSPORTS
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,595
Joined: 17-April 03
From: Modesto, Ca
Member No.: 580



2.0 =

2.2 =

2.4 =

2.7 =

2.8? =

3.0 =

3.2 =

3.4? =

3.6 =


I'm looking for the stock HP rating.

If you know of a Link that has this info, please share.

TIA,

This post has been edited by Scott Carlberg: Apr 8 2004, 07:33 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 07:37 PM
Post #2


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



A bit too many variables. T, E, S, etc...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Scott Carlberg
post Apr 8 2004, 07:48 PM
Post #3


Porsche MOTORSPORTS
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,595
Joined: 17-April 03
From: Modesto, Ca
Member No.: 580



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Apr 8 2004, 05:37 PM)
A bit too many variables. T, E, S, etc...

you could give the range, but....

how about the most powerful model, which I'd imagine would mean the S, or Carrera models.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Apr 8 2004, 07:50 PM
Post #4


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



2.0 S=160 carbs
2.2 S=190 carbs
2,2 S=180 MFI, 70-71
2.4 S=190 MFI, 72-73
2.7 S, 1975= 175, cis


Shit, can't find BAs book, THAT'S WHAT I REMEMBER....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Apr 8 2004, 07:52 PM
Post #5


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,991
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



Here's a link, the numbers seem reasonably accurate for the few that I looked at.

http://www.rennlist.com/FAQ/sect1.html#q1.4


Note that 2.8 is an aftermarket displacement, built for a specific SCCA racing class that goes up to 2.8 liters. 3.4 is a "convenient" overbore size for the 3.2 and possibly 3.0 motors, but it is also aftermarket only.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Scott Carlberg
post Apr 8 2004, 07:53 PM
Post #6


Porsche MOTORSPORTS
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,595
Joined: 17-April 03
From: Modesto, Ca
Member No.: 580



thanks Dave, that's awesome.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 08:00 PM
Post #7


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
you could give the range, but....


Why you snotty lil bastard! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Here goes... (like I've got all day) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 08:06 PM
Post #8


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
2.2 S=190 carbs


NSA
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ein 6er
post Apr 8 2004, 08:19 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,115
Joined: 11-February 03
Member No.: 300
Region Association: None



condensed v. to 3.0

disclaimer ..... may not be 100% accurate!! don't quote me!! (-:

67/68 2.0
911, L 130
T 110
S 160

68/69 2.0
T 110
E 140
S 170

69/70-71 2.2
T 125
E 155
S 180

71/72 2.4
T 130
E 165
S 190

73/77? 2.7
911 143
S 167
carrera 152

78/83 3.0
SC 172
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Scott Carlberg
post Apr 8 2004, 08:53 PM
Post #10


Porsche MOTORSPORTS
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,595
Joined: 17-April 03
From: Modesto, Ca
Member No.: 580



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Apr 8 2004, 06:00 PM)
QUOTE
you could give the range, but....


Satisfied? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

Geez Eric, maybe it's time to move AWAY from Utah, eh? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)


Thanks for the numbers guys, I appreciate it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 08:58 PM
Post #11


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
Geez Eric, maybe it's time to move AWAY from Utah, eh?


Jus joke'n with ya...

Yeah... I need more 3.2 beer! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Red-Beard
post Apr 8 2004, 09:14 PM
Post #12


"Ya canna change the laws of Physics"
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,124
Joined: 11-February 03
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 288
Region Association: None



2.7 RS = 210+
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty
post Apr 8 2004, 09:17 PM
Post #13


The Fun Never Stops
***

Group: Members
Posts: 773
Joined: 20-May 03
From: Portland. Oregon (SW)
Member No.: 718
Region Association: None



2.0, 2.2 = okay
2.4 = good
2.7 = fun
3.0 = fun!
3.2 = really fun!
3.6 = OMG! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Apr 8 2004, 09:22 PM
Post #14


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Apr 8 2004, 06:06 PM)
QUOTE
2.2 S=190 carbs


NSA

YUP....FOUND MAH BOOK....MISSED BY 10 HP....

My bad.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 09:31 PM
Post #15


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



For some oDD reason you're forgiven.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cha914
post Apr 8 2004, 09:38 PM
Post #16


MUSR 8 - 5lug conversion done wed - drive 500miles thrus
***

Group: Members
Posts: 739
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 63



Just curious, but what does a warmed over 2.4 with carbs come in at? Not a race motor, just a nice street motor, an equivalent build up to the 2056 for the 4s...

I have some strange attraction to that motor size...can't really put my finger on it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mueba.gif)

Thanks,

Tony
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Apr 8 2004, 09:40 PM
Post #17


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



Four or a six?

It all depends on the "warmed" over calculations....cams, compression ratio, stroker versus bigger jugs....all adds to the mix....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cha914
post Apr 8 2004, 10:00 PM
Post #18


MUSR 8 - 5lug conversion done wed - drive 500miles thrus
***

Group: Members
Posts: 739
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 63



2.4 six...I know it all depends, but what is the range? I doubt I would want to mess with MFI, and probably wouldn't have the coin to go with a full EFI...

so a mild 2.4 carb motor? ballpark?

Tony
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Apr 8 2004, 10:10 PM
Post #19


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,278
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



The S engine could be considered "warmed over" 190-200 would be my guess...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
campbellcj
post Apr 8 2004, 10:25 PM
Post #20


I can't Re Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,549
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Agoura, CA
Member No.: 21
Region Association: Southern California



Eric is correct that you will be somewhat hard-pressed to do better than a factory "S" without a sizable budget. (As in, some people will spend over $20K on small displacement race motors, using exoticatanium innards.)

But the 2.4S was a relatively low-compression (8.5:1 IIRC) configuration to deal with the increasing emission pressures and fuel prices/quality. You could potentially squeek a single plug 2.4 up towards 10.5:1 but most folks target 9.5:1 as the max "safe" C/R for single-plug cars on pump gas.

You could potentially also look at wilder cams but again the engine would be less streetable and more expensive.

I personally think the 2.0-2.2S "zingers" are a lot of fun. They are not the fastest on the track, or the friendliest street cruisers, but the sound and feel as they come on the cam is seriously diluted in the larger, torquier engines.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 04:25 PM