Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 6 exhaust ?
scotty b
post Aug 28 2010, 07:07 PM
Post #1


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



Over the years I have seen many on here use stock 6 exhaust headers on 2.7 - 3.2 engines. Seems to me they are a bit puny ( not enough i.d. to flow well ) on anything over a mild 2.4 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Am I right on this ? Assuming so what options are there for the larger displacement / horsepower engines ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
J P Stein
post Aug 28 2010, 07:16 PM
Post #2


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



It depends on exhaust port size.....you've covered a wide range. The header ID should be no smaller than the exhaust port....but if you want heat.........
The options with heat are hella expensive and some are not well made...from what I read.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Aug 28 2010, 07:42 PM
Post #3


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



I'm going to try and make my own clam shells to fit over my MSDS headers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rav914
post Aug 28 2010, 08:19 PM
Post #4


All-weather fan
***

Group: Members
Posts: 740
Joined: 15-April 07
From: WA
Member No.: 7,669
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Aug 28 2010, 06:42 PM) *

I'm going to try and make my own clam shells to fit over my MSDS headers.


I'm going to do the same on the /4 headers I plan on installing next spring. Best of luck to you good sir.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Larry.Hubby
post Aug 28 2010, 09:03 PM
Post #5


Member who doesn't post much, but has a long time in 914s
**

Group: Members
Posts: 189
Joined: 24-November 04
From: Palo Alto, CA
Member No.: 3,172
Region Association: Northern California



I suppose it depends on what part of the rev range you want to optimize. You are correct that the stock 914-6 heater boxes are on the small side (1 3/8" dia. primaries), even for the stock 2.0 liter engine size, IF you're talking about race conditions and the 5000-6500 rpm part of the power curve. I had 1 3/4" headers on my 3.0 conversion for years, and can testify that it gave great results up near the redline, but was surprisingly gutless down where I used it 99+% of the time (2500-4500 rpm). As soon as I bolted on the stock parts, I noticed drive-ability and apparent power improved dramatically under daily driving conditions. I've also heard from others with sixes and six conversions that the stock exhaust parts are not only OK for engines up to about 3.2, but seem actually much better most of the time because they improve the mid-range power. No question that, if you got into a top end contest in a car like mine with someone in a similar car but larger diameter headers, you'd be at a disadvantage. What most people tend to overlook, however, is that you give up quite a lot in terms of mid-range power to get that top-end performance when you switch to larger headers, and you use the former much more often than the latter.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronHillRestorations
post Aug 29 2010, 06:12 AM
Post #6


I. I. R. C.
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,833
Joined: 18-March 03
From: West TN
Member No.: 439
Region Association: None



A little smaller is better than a little too big. Except for all out racing applications the flat 6's do best with a little back pressure.

You guys making heat exchangers out of mild steel headers had better make sure your life insurance is paid up, and your bucket list is checked off pretty well, as it's a dangerous proposition!!

There's a reason all Porsche heat exchangers since the mid 60's have tubing made of stainless, and it's because a few people got killed by exhaust gasses in the cabin. TRYING TO MAKE HEAT EXCHANGERS FROM MILD STEEL HEADERS IS POTENTIALLY LETHAL!!
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rav914
post Aug 29 2010, 07:27 AM
Post #7


All-weather fan
***

Group: Members
Posts: 740
Joined: 15-April 07
From: WA
Member No.: 7,669
Region Association: None



I planned on making them out of Aluminum. Same story? I honestly didn't know mild steel was an issue.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Aug 29 2010, 10:44 AM
Post #8


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



If you're going to drive you car winters in the salt and crap with raw uncoated steel I can see it. In a summer car that sees limited mileage, with ceramic coated pipes I really doubt you would ever have a problem.

Cheap insurance is to run a battery operated CO2 alarm, if you can't afford $35 then a colourmetric CO2 detector is less than $10 and will last 2 seasons.

I've seen cracked an poorly welded SS pipes as well. All the commercially available aftermarket /6 exchangers have a weld inside the exchanger.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronHillRestorations
post Aug 29 2010, 11:14 AM
Post #9


I. I. R. C.
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,833
Joined: 18-March 03
From: West TN
Member No.: 439
Region Association: None



The exhaust gasses will help corrode the pipes from the inside out.

A CO detector is a great idea.

The factory 6 h/e's have no welds inside the heat collectors, nor do the B & B's. The only aftermarket ones I've seen with welds inside the heat collectors are the ones from England, so that probably limits them from a loss of life lawsuit. There's no way you can be sure a weld inside the heat collector won't fail, and of course you'll never see it.

No mild steel h/e's and no welds inside the heat collectors is the only way to go, but what do I know.

Post some pics of your wife or girlfriend though, as I'm sure there's plenty of lonely single guys in this group!
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th July 2025 - 04:59 PM