Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 1.8--->2.0 Big Bore vs. stock 2.0, Cheeper to build a Big Bore from a 1.8?
thomasotten
post Jul 9 2004, 09:36 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,565
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



I need some advise as to which direction to take my project. I have a 1.8 engine that is already out of my car. It could use a rebuild. I was wondering, for a street car with miild performance increases desired, what are the pros and cons of rebuilding a 1.8 engine to a big bore 2.0, as opposed to just buying a stock 2.0L and rebuilding that? Would I come out about the same, cost and performance wise? Either system will have 2.0L heat exhangers/exhaust.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 17)
seanery
post Jul 9 2004, 09:49 AM
Post #2


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,857
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None



Webcam $158
Lifters $140
96mm Pistons/Cylinders $349 - $2000
Engine Seal Kit - $60

I think cost would be the same either way with more fun bigger.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 9 2004, 09:55 AM
Post #3


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



the cost would be similar... you would have to factor in a crank too Sean... that ain't cheap...

if you already got the 1.8 though... it would be cheaper than finding a rebuildable 2.0... the heads alone make the 2.0 more expensive and you can get almost as good performace from 1.8 heads, esp if you open them up some with the money you save
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Jul 9 2004, 10:56 AM
Post #4


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



Since labor and machining costs would be the same whether you rebuild a 1.8 or 2L I'd go with a 2L. For an extra couple hundred you could find a good 2L crank and rods and use your 1.8L case. The 914 cases are mostly all the same. When you have the heads redone you can have the spark plug relocated to the 2L (better) position. I'd also do the smaller spark plug modification like Jake does. With work 1.8L heads should flow almost as well as 2L heads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Jul 15 2004, 08:56 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,565
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



So does the 1.8/1.7 case need to be machined to accept the 96 mm (or 94 mm) pistons/cylinders?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 15 2004, 10:05 AM
Post #6


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(thomasotten @ Jul 15 2004, 09:56 AM)
So does the 1.8/1.7 case need to be machined to accept the 96 mm (or 94 mm) pistons/cylinders?

no the case should be fine up to about 103mm if I remember...

the heads on the 1.7 would need machining for 96mm+

but all of the cases are about the same...

see this for more info:

type 4 secrets revealed
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Jul 15 2004, 12:28 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,565
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



So what about reliability? Do 2.0 L heads last longer than 1.8 heads machined for big bore? Are they a better design, do they cool better? There is just such a big price difference in 1.8 and 2.0 heads, I am trying to find the justification for the difference in price.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Jul 15 2004, 12:38 PM
Post #8


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



The 2.0 heads flow better, and have a better spark plug position than the earlier heads. They're highly prized by the entire T4 community (bug/bus conversion guys, too), which is why the price is so high.

Since you're going for a mild increase, just adding the 96mm P&Cs to your 1.8 and a slightly hotter cam is probably plenty.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
newdeal2
post Jul 15 2004, 12:52 PM
Post #9


Unregistered









There are other things to consider before you do this. I am in the middle of a 2.0 rebuild for the first time [and BTW, I have a 73 Grind webcam for $138.00 brand new].

In addition to what has been mentioned you will also need to rebush your rods, measure and check the crank, align bore the case, replace all bearings and seals, rebuild the heads, posibly modify the oil pump [Jake can sell you a kit] , and one of the most inportant issues up front is carbs vs fuel injection .

As a guess look at about $2,000.00 for the parts and machine shop work.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Jul 15 2004, 01:01 PM
Post #10


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Align boring the case is almost never required on a Type IV. This is commonplace on Type Is, and far too many Type I mechanics do it unnecessarily on the Type IV, too.

For a mild upgrade on a street engine, just replacing the pistons and cylinders is adequate. No need to split the case at all. You can, if you really want to, but it isn't required. The bottom ends on these engines are well known to last 250K miles w/o rebuilding. Heads regularly need attention after 50-60K miles, so you ARE looking at either getting your 1.8 heads rebuilt, or buying some remanufactured heads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Jul 15 2004, 01:30 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,565
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



QUOTE(newdeal2 @ Jul 15 2004, 10:52 AM)
posibly modify the oil pump [Jake can sell you a kit] ,

When I last rebuilt the engine, I bought an upgraded oil pump from tweeks, that was a long time ago. Is this the same thing that Jake sells, and if not, what kind of volume does it push compared to the stock, or the traditional upgrade like I have? Also, what is Jake's price for that upgrade?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
newdeal2
post Jul 15 2004, 02:02 PM
Post #12


Unregistered









I have yet to get an answer on the cost but I have been told it's a good upgrade. No specifics on performance.

It is true you may not have to align bore the case but it doesn't hurt to check it before assembly.

I don't know the exact milage on my engine [the po says 130,000 so but he lied a lot]
When I checked my lifters they were starting to cup slightly so I dug into the case. I wanted
to learn anyway so am doing any corrections/upgrades to keep it running for a while.

I have been told that unless you are going to use the car for other than street driving balancing the crank, etc isn't critical but there are many opnions on the subject.

Webcam has matching lifters for about $100.00 for their cams and they have a new design [which I have] that are two piece. Esentially the core has some movement [held in with a circlip]. It will be interesting to see what the results are from Jake. I hope it's good news.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jul 15 2004, 03:09 PM
Post #13


914 Idiot
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 15,192
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The 2.0 heads, in stock form, make better power than the other Type IV heads. They are, however, more fragile and prone to cracks. Particularly at the spark plug holes, and on the short-radius side of the exhaust port.

The other Type IV heads all seem to have more material in those areas and are more robust. You can probably re-work a 1.8 head so that it flows as well as or better than a 2.0 one, but of course it will cost you some money.

With a 94x71 motor (2.0), you will have 1971cc of displacement. With a 96x66 motor (1.8 with "big bore" kit) you will have 1911cc. 60cc isn't exactly nothing, but it's not a whole heap of displacement either. You can make either one the better performer than the other by throwing enough money at it...

I think the 1.9 is an attractive option, myself.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 15 2004, 03:22 PM
Post #14


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



you should at least check the align bore... it doesn't need as often as the type 1s need it... but these ARE 30 year old cases :|

in stock form the 2.0s do flow better and get better performance... but they also tend to crack more often around the spark plug... which is why Jake goes to a 12mm plug..(I'm sure there are other reasons too...

the 1.8 heads can be made to flow as well or better and get equal performance as well...

an upgraded (type 1, 30mm) oil pump can be had from aircooled.net as well..

Ipersonally would invest in the ceramic lifters if you plan to keep the engine for a long time... $400 is cheap when you can use them in the next engine too (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thomasotten
post Jul 15 2004, 03:50 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,565
Joined: 16-November 03
From: San Antonio, Texas
Member No.: 1,349



Is aircooled.net's upgraded oil pump the same as Jake's?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 16 2004, 01:16 PM
Post #16


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



I don't know if they are EXACTLY the same... but they are very similar... Jake highly recommended the ac.net one as well!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
p914
post Jul 16 2004, 01:40 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 7-September 03
From: Sunny South Florida
Member No.: 1,117
Region Association: None



QUOTE(newdeal2 @ Jul 15 2004, 10:52 AM)
As a guess look at about $2,000.00 for the parts and machine shop work.

What would the avg labor hours be on that?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Jul 16 2004, 05:48 PM
Post #18


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



Ya might want to consider using a 2 litre crank and rods with your 96s (different from the 1.7/1.8 96s, BTW, with a different pin location). Lot of 'em out there, being they came in all the busses from '76-'79. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 04:20 AM