 ATT: DIZZY GURU'S |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Ray Warren |
 Feb 28 2005, 07:14 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Benefactors Posts: 415 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Canada Member No.: 1,214 Region Association: None   |
I have a stock 2.0L with after market FI (fuel only).
I am wondering what dizzy to use. I have a 1.7, 1.8, and a 2.0 dizzy. Looking at this chart that I copied from the Pelican board (hope they don't mind). I am thinking about using the 1.8L dizzy. Do you think it has too much advance curve? If I do use it, should I set the timming for a 2.0L or a 1.8L? What do you guys think? Attached image(s) 
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies(1 - 1)
| SLITS |
Feb 28 2005, 07:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
"This Utah shit is HARSH!" Group: Benefactors Posts: 13,602 Joined: 22-February 04 From: SoCal Mountains ... Member No.: 1,696 Region Association: None |
Use the 1.8....you don't need the trigger points.
The total advance is meaningless, in the respect that you are going to time it a 27 degrees at 3K RPM....all of the mechanical advance should be in at that time. The more mechanical advance built into the unit, the closer to TDC your static ignition timing will be (easier starting). The rate it comes in at will effect performance, but they all seem about the same. The vac stuff is mainly for emission control. My $0.05 worth. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 07:41 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.