6/carbs: ? about tall 2ndary venturi's, rich, I miss you. |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
6/carbs: ? about tall 2ndary venturi's, rich, I miss you. |
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 11:50 AM
Post
#1
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
carbs: ? about tall 2ndary venturi's
Hi all... thanks for the help in advance. I want to try a set of the tall 2ndary's on my IDS-3C carbs. I'm running the stock ones and want to try the tall ones, that I've heard called "906-style" its a race car and withoug re-hashing all of my jetting and dyno history, my questions are: 1) pierce manifold says they have 2 different types in stock a 3.5 size and a 4.5 size. I believe this measurement is in reference to bore and not height. Pierce said that both sizes are the "tall" type. Which do I want? Motor is a 1967 2.0/S motor at altitude. (the pierce catalogue references that the IDS carbs came with 4.5 short, but I'd like confirmation before I order) 2) Does anyone know if these tall secondaries interchange on the IDA carb versus the IDS carb. I would assume so, but I once bought some F33 emulsion tubes from Pierce that do fit the IDA, and found that they would not fit the IDS. I didn't know there was that much difference between the two carbs, which surprised me. But again, before I order do people know if the 906-type tall 2ndaries will fit an IDS-3C body? again, thanks in advance everyone! brant |
Root_Werks |
Nov 3 2005, 12:01 PM
Post
#2
|
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,337 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Actually, Jake Raby had a decent write up on stack hieght some time ago. He mentioned going tall made a big difference, but you could also go too tall. I would say go with the 3.5's. I think if you go too tall, you begin to loose the effiency of the volicity effect? ..... I think anyway. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/idea.gif)
|
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 12:06 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Dan,
I think your referencing the horns I'm talking about a different part. the 2ndary venturi, that sits inside of the carb throat on top of the primary venturi. the tall ones (used on the 906 motor) stick up above the carb body, and into the horns brant |
Jake Raby |
Nov 3 2005, 12:06 PM
Post
#4
|
Engine Surgeon Group: Members Posts: 9,394 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Lost Member No.: 1,095 Region Association: South East States |
All my testing would not apply to the six... It has different head characteristics that really impact results.
On a /4 no matter displacement I have found shorter stacks(just enough to control reversion) are mucho better for top end power and efficiency, while tall stacks are much better for low end grunt... BUT even the exhaust system will impact this- I have seen a 18HP variance just from swapping stacks on an 8,000 RPM capable engine. But I'll stress that my theory has never been employed on the six- |
Root_Werks |
Nov 3 2005, 12:59 PM
Post
#5
|
||
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,337 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooh, those. Don't know. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/sad.gif) |
||
Aaron Cox |
Nov 3 2005, 01:06 PM
Post
#6
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
doesnt JP have tall ones on hez carbZ?
Just a lead (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif) |
Downunderman |
Nov 3 2005, 01:10 PM
Post
#7
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 852 Joined: 31-May 03 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 766 Region Association: Australia and New Zealand |
I got mine from PMO.
|
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 01:40 PM
Post
#8
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Howard, JP,
do you guys know if yours are 3.5 or 4.5? (I'm assuming that is the measurement in mm's of the bore of the part, but you know what they say about assuming) apparently PMO is out, and has been out of them for a few months. They recommended Pierce. (seems like every opened box, has a new smaller box inside of it.) brant |
Phoenix-MN |
Nov 3 2005, 02:00 PM
Post
#9
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 927 Joined: 23-January 04 From: ST. Bonifacius,MN Member No.: 1,590 |
I have the tall ones on my 2.5L 911, I'll look tonight if I can see what size they are.
Paul |
john rogers |
Nov 3 2005, 02:37 PM
Post
#10
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,525 Joined: 4-March 03 From: Chula Vista CA Member No.: 391 |
My race engine has the real tall ones and the cards are the IDS type and have the "candy canes" still in place. I used some very small brass tube from a hobby shop and extended the nozzles so they would fit over the top and I do get a tad bit of enrichment from them. Pierce Manifolds said most guys block them off but I decided to try and see if the'd work and they do above 5K RPM. They told me since I had the 906 cams the largest ones would work the best and that seems to be true.
|
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 04:27 PM
Post
#11
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Thanks Paul!
John... is the 3.5 versus 4.5 a measurement of bore? at first I thought it was height (tall) but pierce said that it was not about height, and was a measurement of bore. when you say that you have "the larger ones" does that mean that yours have a bore (hole size) of 4.5 then? sorry for restating the same question, just want to be sure. brant |
john rogers |
Nov 3 2005, 05:14 PM
Post
#12
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,525 Joined: 4-March 03 From: Chula Vista CA Member No.: 391 |
Yes, larger bore.
|
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 05:46 PM
Post
#13
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
cool thanks John!
(I didn't even know there were 2 different sizes) Thanks a TON John! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif) |
J P Stein |
Nov 3 2005, 06:01 PM
Post
#14
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Oh boy, I get to post my only artsy pic....that I have taken.
I went out and measured. The height (lenght) of these puppies is 4.5 inches. Bore is a bit less (eyeball) than .5 in. Attached image(s) |
Trekkor |
Nov 3 2005, 06:12 PM
Post
#15
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
that picture makes me happy (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wub.gif)
|
Aaron Cox |
Nov 3 2005, 06:14 PM
Post
#16
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
gawd - what did those milled aircleaner bases set you back (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/pinch.gif)
|
J P Stein |
Nov 3 2005, 06:21 PM
Post
#17
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
I've heard a few things about "why"....internet stuff, mostly.
Lotta salt grains here. My carbs came to me with em' and I didn't have to "fix" anything. whut I hear: Better mid range. Less fuel reversion in the aux venturi (the gas comes in there) with long duration cams due to the increased height. Used first on the 906 (with 906 cams...go figure) Thas all I might know. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/huh.gif) Steve Wiener could give you the straight scoop |
J P Stein |
Nov 3 2005, 06:24 PM
Post
#18
|
||
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Not cheep & NLA. I sold/traded them to MikeZ. Here's an old pic. Attached image(s) |
||
Aaron Cox |
Nov 3 2005, 06:27 PM
Post
#19
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
whatchu runnin now JP?
ITG style? wonder if they maketh those tall vens for an IDF |
brant |
Nov 3 2005, 06:37 PM
Post
#20
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Its the reversion issue and my 4K stumble that has pushed me into the decision to try.
I'm only running S cams, but depending upon how they are timed, they could still be a problem. Plus I'm running such big venturi's that I picked up a mid range stumble. brant |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 06:28 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |