Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Here is the answer on windshields and racecars, Per the PCA
URY914
post Nov 7 2005, 09:21 PM
Post #1


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 121,116
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



This came up last week when JP was thinking about cutting his windshield off. I emaiiled the PCA technical chairman and got this reply...

"Wow, is there ever a lot of confusion. I am presuming that you are talking about GT-class cars -- obviously our stock class cars must have windshields.

Our GT-class cars do NOT have to have windshields, but obviously a driver in an open car must wear a full face helmet with the face shield in place, and wear arm restraints.

I think the origin of any confusion out there is not the windshield, but the height of the front roll hoop on the roll cage. We changed the wording in Appendix A on roll bars and roll cages last year to the following: "The top of the main hoop (and front hoop if applicable) must be at least 2" above the driver's helmet when the driver is seated in the normal driving position. Additionally, if a full cage is required, the top of the front hoop and the top of the main hoop must form a plane that is above the driver's head. In open top cars, when a full cage is required, the front hoop must also extend 2" above the driver's helmet."

OK, that was serious overkill, since we said basically the same thing three times over, but the general idea was that we were no longer going to allow open cars with low front roll hoops -- and quite a few of these were built some time ago. However, they are not grandfathered -- this is a safety issue.

Does that help?
Donna"

So boys you CAN (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/sawzall-smiley.gif) after all
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 2)
maf914
post Nov 8 2005, 03:32 PM
Post #2


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



Actually, that confuses me. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/screwy.gif)

GT-class, as in GT-1 through GT-5?

What about the production classes?

And when is a full cage required? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Nov 8 2005, 06:14 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,856
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



That is BS. The production people have been through this for several years. AS long as the driver is below the line on the main hoop, you will not hit the ground. If you don't beleive that, have you ever seen an F1 car with a high front hoop? The problems with the low front hoop is the whole getting out of the car if it is upside down. You will have a tough time getting out of an upside down car with a low front roll hoop. PCA is probably concerned about their workers not being able to get to you in the event of a roll over.

What it boils down to is one to many idiots put themselves too close to the roll bar.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 07:19 AM