Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Progressive springs.. here's the dirt!, Weltmeister 180s specifically
bondo
post Jun 5 2006, 05:38 PM
Post #1


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



Ever wonder what the specifics of a progressive rate spring are? I did. They're sold as "180", but they're "progressive" so that can't be enough to go by.

The springs I tested are Weltmeister progressive 180s, and have a pretty clear wide coil spacing section, then a narrow one. They look to be pretty constant within each section. One of the springs is a touch longer than the other, which shows up in the graph.

When lightly loaded they are about a 100 pound rate, and when heavily loaded, they are about a 160 pound rate. The transition happens at about 340 lbs of force and about 3.75" of compression.

I'm using these for a V8 conversion, and since it'll be a street car, these will probably work quite nicely. Here's a graph:


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 6)
Andyrew
post Jun 5 2006, 05:43 PM
Post #2


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,380
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Cool info!

Good to have some actual facts...

I thought progressives were only made in 160 though..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drive-ability
post Jun 5 2006, 06:09 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,169
Joined: 18-March 05
From: Orange County, California
Member No.: 3,782



I have wonder about that as well, you would think its basic and should be in the description. Now looking at just the description of 180 whats with that?
Light load = 100 heavy load = 160 = 180 ?
I am running 165 on my V8 (Street) car and love them.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bondo
post Jun 5 2006, 06:21 PM
Post #4


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



QUOTE(Andyrew @ Jun 5 2006, 04:43 PM) *

Cool info!

Good to have some actual facts...

I thought progressives were only made in 160 though..


Well I would call these 160, despite the SP180 that's printed on them. Close enough for me though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bondo
post Jun 5 2006, 06:26 PM
Post #5


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



QUOTE(drive-ability @ Jun 5 2006, 05:09 PM) *

I have wonder about that as well, you would think its basic and should be in the description. Now looking at just the description of 180 whats with that?
Light load = 100 heavy load = 160 = 180 ?
I am running 165 on my V8 (Street) car and love them.


I'm guessing the 180 is supposed to be the heavy load rating. If I were a spring manufacturer I would include the light load rate, the heavy load rate, and the transition point. Maybe they think that is too confusing for the consumer, or maybe they just want to keep it a secret?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Jun 5 2006, 07:02 PM
Post #6


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



These are not really progressive. The larger spaced coils should be 180 lbs/inch. The more tightly spaced coils are 'dead coils'. These dead coils bottom out on each other and become solid under normal conditions. Then, only the remaining coils are 'active', giving it a useable spring rate of 180 lbs/inch.

The reason they do this is because they have to make the springs fit the shocks. If the spring was entirely 180 lbs/in spring coils, then your ride height would look like a 4x4, and there would be no way to lower it enough. So they put in these dead coils to make up the extra travel, while still allowing for full suspension travel. It's really a trade-off since like you have noticed, when the spring starts to unload, the spring rate decreases. Of course, that decrease is generally a good thing.

Demick
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47fan
post Jun 6 2006, 11:35 PM
Post #7


It Looks Better In Person. . .
***

Group: Members
Posts: 860
Joined: 17-September 03
From: Carlsbad, CA
Member No.: 1,170
Region Association: Southern California



How's the fit in the lower spring perch? The SP180 I've seen look like they have a slightly larger diameter that doesn't exactly fit into the perch cup.

Thanks,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 12:21 PM