Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> piston question, flat or dish
nycchef
post Jul 17 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #1


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



i have a set of mahle dish pistons from my 2.0. they seem perfect. i will be putting carbs and a web cam on it. what do i lose by staying with dish as opossed to flat. i'd like to save the $400. or so bucks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 12)
SGB
post Jul 17 2008, 09:38 PM
Post #2


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



It would be lower the compression, but IDK how much. Seems like I 'member the US 2.0 was 7.6/1 (that may have been the CA model) and I'm pretty sure it used dished pistons. The euro flat topped were 8.1/1 or thereabouts. This is all of the top of the ol' head, and I may be halucinating AGAIN, so don't quote me.
Conversly, as gas prices go up, lower compression would allow use of lower grade gas. Might be a good thing...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hydroliftin
post Jul 17 2008, 10:13 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 373
Joined: 8-November 06
From: Vallejo, CA
Member No.: 7,180
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(nycchef @ Jul 17 2008, 08:27 PM) *

i have a set of mahle dish pistons from my 2.0. they seem perfect. i will be putting carbs and a web cam on it. what do i lose by staying with dish as opossed to flat. i'd like to save the $400. or so bucks.


When I built my 2.0 the machinist cut the dished mahle pistons down on top to make them flat, then machined the bottom of the cylinders to raise the compression to 8.5 to 1. Works great. This was done by Jay of Jay's Machine Shop in Santa Clara, CA. He is an old school machinist and has worked his fair share of Porsche engines in his time.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Jul 17 2008, 11:06 PM
Post #4


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(hydroliftin @ Jul 17 2008, 11:13 PM) *

...machinist cut the dished mahle pistons down on top to make them flat, then machined the bottom of the cylinders to raise the compression to 8.5 to 1. Works great.

I'm guessing he made the (shorter) pushrods for your hydroliftin cam? I don't guess it is enough to really see, is it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nycchef
post Jul 18 2008, 08:28 AM
Post #5


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



so am i correct in thinking less compression = less hp? will the difference be significant? i don't want to build a 2.0 that pulls like a 1.7. i am not (obviously) well versed in these matters (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmill
post Jul 18 2008, 08:42 AM
Post #6


Green Hornet
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,449
Joined: 9-May 08
From: Racine, Wisconsin
Member No.: 9,038
Region Association: Upper MidWest



You are correct. Less compression = less HP. Doing some quick math the difference between 7.6 and 8.1 is about 9% less HP.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bartlett 914
post Jul 18 2008, 08:46 AM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 30-August 05
From: South Elgin IL
Member No.: 4,707
Region Association: Upper MidWest



There are also Bus pistons that have a deeper dish. 914 dished pistons would be fine but I would stay away from bus pistons.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nycchef
post Jul 18 2008, 09:22 AM
Post #8


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Bartlett 914 @ Jul 18 2008, 06:46 AM) *

There are also Bus pistons that have a deeper dish. 914 dished pistons would be fine but I would stay away from bus pistons.


can anyone tell me what i have?


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bartlett 914
post Jul 18 2008, 09:36 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 30-August 05
From: South Elgin IL
Member No.: 4,707
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Looks like 914 to me. My bus pistons have a smaller dia dish but a lot deeper. I don'r remember the cc's but about double IIRC
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nycchef
post Jul 18 2008, 09:50 AM
Post #10


mechanical moron
***

Group: Members
Posts: 952
Joined: 28-November 05
From: new york city n.y.
Member No.: 5,202
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Bartlett 914 @ Jul 18 2008, 07:36 AM) *

Looka like 914 to me. My bus pistons have a smaller dia dish but a lot deeper. I don'r remember the cc's but about double IIRC


thanks i'll clean em up and see what i have. this is my first rebuild ( unless you count a 68 triumph spitfire 35 years ago) so i want to avoid putting in pistons and then blowing em up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bartlett 914
post Jul 18 2008, 02:08 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 30-August 05
From: South Elgin IL
Member No.: 4,707
Region Association: Upper MidWest



914 on left bus on right
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bartlett 914
post Jul 18 2008, 02:08 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 30-August 05
From: South Elgin IL
Member No.: 4,707
Region Association: Upper MidWest



914 on left bus on right


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hydroliftin
post Jul 18 2008, 02:47 PM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 373
Joined: 8-November 06
From: Vallejo, CA
Member No.: 7,180
Region Association: Northern California



[/quote]
I'm guessing he made the (shorter) pushrods for your hydroliftin cam? I don't guess it is enough to really see, is it?
[/quote]

I bought the Isky "torquer" hydralic cam with matching lifters and push rods. As far as I know it did not require modifying the push rods, so the hydro lifters must be taking up the slack.

In terms of compression ratio, the jugs were modified to sit deeper in the case, so compression ration was increased rather than decreased. Without modifying the cylinders, you are correct that a loss in compression ration would result.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 12:03 AM