Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> intro: ima porsche newb
sm32589g
post Oct 5 2009, 02:02 AM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



hello i just wanted to say hi as i will likely be on this forum from now on. I am a bmw fanatic that just recently purchased a 914. with plans on converting it to a 6 and using it for track purposes. i am knowledgeable about bmw's but when it comes to porsches i know nothing! so please forgive me in advance thank you (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
number6
post Oct 5 2009, 02:34 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 14-September 08
From: portland, or
Member No.: 9,546
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)

Are you familiar with new or older BMWs, or both? Do you know much about the first-gen M Coupes?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zymurgist
post Oct 5 2009, 05:25 AM
Post #3


"Ace" Mechanic
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,411
Joined: 9-June 05
From: Hagerstown, MD
Member No.: 4,238
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)

That conversion's not going to be a simple bolt-in, but lots of guys have done it. Do your research and don't overspend on the engine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Oct 5 2009, 08:34 AM
Post #4


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,465
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png) indeed, sir!

You in Washington State or Washington DC?

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KELTY360
post Oct 5 2009, 09:58 AM
Post #5


914 Neferati
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,036
Joined: 31-December 05
From: Pt. Townsend, WA
Member No.: 5,344
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eddie914
post Oct 5 2009, 10:04 AM
Post #6


Unregistered









Sounds familiar ... that was me about 5 years ago.

I have a 914/6 track car (conversion) and a '88 BMW M5.

By your screen name, I'm guessing you have an E30 325.

Got any pics?

Hope to see you around if you are in Washington State (and not Washington D.C.).

Eddie
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sm32589g
post Oct 5 2009, 10:32 AM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



haha thx for the welcomes guys. I am in Washington state. i mainly have knowledge on e30, e36, and e46's. and I used to have an e30 325 and thats how i came up with the screenname nice guess ><

i am buying a 99 m3 soon to replace my 99 323is m-package. the M will be a show car and the 914 is for the track (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I will post pics of teh porsche and M within the next week.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Oct 5 2009, 11:12 AM
Post #8


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,493
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/assimilate.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sm32589g
post Oct 6 2009, 12:03 AM
Post #9


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



hey guys i found some pics of the new 914 hope you like it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t235/sm32589g/GetAttachmentaspx.jpg)

(IMG:http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t235/sm32589g/DSC_0203.jpg)

(IMG:http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t235/sm32589g/DSC_0207.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Oct 6 2009, 08:44 AM
Post #10


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png) looks like a great car! congrats!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sm32589g
post Oct 6 2009, 06:48 PM
Post #11


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



are there any suggestions you guys may be able to help me with on deciding which engine to put into this thing? i know 911 engines are good but which one is the best for the car?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Oct 6 2009, 08:48 PM
Post #12


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



I've never done a conversion, so IDK what is best. I think the best air-cooled flat six is the 3.2, but it may not fit since it uses the G-50 trans instead of the 901...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Oct 6 2009, 09:14 PM
Post #13


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE
are there any suggestions you guys may be able to help me with on deciding which engine to put into this thing? i know 911 engines are good but which one is the best for the car?

1) it's your car so our opinion really has very little weight...

2) that said, it looks like a very nice stock car... I'd keep it type 4, maybe make it a big type 4, but this is an easy, reliable, "cheap" option. cheap in comparison of course... a water cooled engine requires about the same money, but a LOT more TIME... time that the car is not on the road. a good -6, like a 3.0 or 3.2 adds More money and TIME... and the complexity of the engine is another level that I cannot even attest to.

again, it's your choice tho...
what's you budget? timeline? personal experience with the choices (type 4, SBC, Subaru, 911 engines)?

what do you want the car to be when it grows up?
a street car? auto-x demon? daily driver? concourse?




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sm32589g
post Oct 6 2009, 09:32 PM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



i did a little bit of digging and i found a 1986 911 3.2L 6 that i am thinking would be plenty of "fun" for us. also there is no time cutoff this is simply a winter project that hopefully if we work on it everyday can run it next summer.

from your experiences is this engine choice a good choice? what transmissions go best with this?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Oct 6 2009, 09:43 PM
Post #15


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



probably the most powerful -6 that you can use by normal conversion... should be very reliable but I would still have it checked out by a good 911 mechanic.

my guess is a g50, maybe a 915... either will have to be worked on to switch the R&P and get the linkage set up. you might be able to use a 901 for a little while tho. I know some chevy guys use the 901 and are just gentle starting out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sm32589g
post Oct 7 2009, 02:27 AM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-October 09
From: Washington
Member No.: 10,889
Region Association: None



what do you mean "gentle starting out"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carr914
post Oct 7 2009, 05:40 AM
Post #17


Racer from Birth
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 119,021
Joined: 2-February 04
From: Tampa,FL
Member No.: 1,623
Region Association: South East States



"Gentle Starting out" means no dumping the clutch - no jackrabbit starts.

As far as trannies, a 915 would be good, but you have to flip the Ring&Pinion. You would also need the WEVO kit - $$$
The G50 is a great tranny, but I don't thing you can flip the R&P, so you would have to run it upside down. And a cable shifter.
Another choice would be a 930. Again run upside down w/ a cable shifter. This would be a 4-speed.

T.C.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Grngoat
post Oct 8 2009, 01:48 AM
Post #18


Lurker Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 17-October 04
From: Fort Worth, TX
Member No.: 2,967
Region Association: Southwest Region



I see you found it to the world. Welcome.

I run a 901 behind my 3.6. Andy does the same on his. That's the cheapeast, easiest option, but you do have to be easy on first gear. So far it's surviived for about 20,000 miles and a dozen or so autocrosses. I did have a bearing fail in the trans, but who knows if that was just old age are not. Otherwise, it is okay.

A 915 is a little harder to do, but not that bad - just more $. A 930 is more money and bulletproof. A G-50 is quite a bit more involved. I don't know of anyone ever having done it, really. I know that Clay Perrine is planning to, and I will eventually, but there is a lot of work involved there. You have to run the transmission inverted because you can't flip the ring gear, and that interfere's with the rear trunk floor. Shift linkage is all different. Yada, yada.

A 3.2 with a 901 would be great. You can always upgrage the trans later.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 8 2009, 11:49 AM
Post #19


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,679
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Grngoat @ Oct 7 2009, 11:48 PM) *

I run a 901 behind my 3.6. Andy does the same on his. That's the cheapeast, easiest option, but you do have to be easy on first gear.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

So far, so good. The 901 is holding up well with the 3.6L motor. I don't use 1st gear at all anymore, i take off in second.

I used a KEP Stage 2 Clutch and Pressureplate plus a ringgear adapter and bolted the 901 straight to the 3.6L motor running a (lightened) 993 flywheel.

That seems by far the easiest solution and works well if you don't insist on 1st gear burnouts.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zymurgist
post Oct 8 2009, 12:19 PM
Post #20


"Ace" Mechanic
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,411
Joined: 9-June 05
From: Hagerstown, MD
Member No.: 4,238
Region Association: None



QUOTE(carr914 @ Oct 7 2009, 07:40 AM) *

Another choice would be a 930. Again run upside down w/ a cable shifter. This would be a 4-speed.


Bring money. Lots of it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 06:12 AM