Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Model Specific Information

914/4: 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 914/6: 70 71 72

> Nailed topcs on this forum, Should we change the format?
Pat Garvey
post May 3 2008, 05:25 PM
Post #1


Do I or don't I...........?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,899
Joined: 24-March 06
From: SE PA, near Philly
Member No.: 5,765
Region Association: North East States



Last night, as every other Friday for the last 12 years, I spoke for 2+ hours with my very best bud (35 years!), 1970 Neun vierzehn. We chitchat like old ladies every 2nd Friday about 914's, model railroad stuff, and ties to Cincinnati.

This time, a large part of the conversation was dedicated to the nailed threads of this forum. They are helpful (I hope), but disjointed (our opinion), and aren't a "ready reference". Oh, you can dig through them and maybe find the info you want, but you may need to dig through 2, 3 or more of them.

Here's our thought - and it means quite a bit of work, but may be worth it.

Instead or categorized 914 areas, which cover all years of 914's, what about re-sorting all the posts in those nailed threads to be model year specific? Instead of all engine compartments/interiors, etc being in one location, what about ALL items associated with a model & year 914 in one nailed thread?

Say you have a newly acquired, or in-resto 1970 914/6. Instead of searching through interior/engine/etc threads for info - we put everything in one nailed thread. You want info on '73 front bumper tits - go to the '73 models thread. Need to know what correct wheels are for a '72 four or six - go to the '72 thread.

With that in mind, what are your felings about the change? I would like to think of the nailed posts as a history binder for CW's of all vintages.

How would you structure it? All comments are welcomed and appreciated.
Pat
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Pat Garvey
post May 13 2008, 08:59 PM
Post #2


Do I or don't I...........?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,899
Joined: 24-March 06
From: SE PA, near Philly
Member No.: 5,765
Region Association: North East States



I've been giving this some more thought, aided by several of this forum's stalwarts.

Here's the consensus proposal:

Under the title of "Model Specific Information" will be eleven succint threads - one each for 1970, thru 1972 914'6's, one for 916's, one each for each 914-4 model thru 1976.

Each thread will be locked & controlled by the writer/"threadmeister" (as well as the forum admin).

All "threadmeisters" will be responsible for all posts to that thread, fielding suggested info & posting those items appropriate to that thread. This would be accomplished via PM's, since each thread will be locked.

Each of the eleven threads would be responsible for providing the same information, in a similar format (to be determined):
Page 1 - general shots - front, rear, side, plus general changes between years.
Page 2 - options, color, price.
Page 3 - front trunk.
Page 4 - rear trunk.
Page 5 - interior.
Page 6: appearance group/performance group - if applicable.
Page 7: special models withing the MY.

For now, all pic's would be approximately the same, and of the same pixel range - so comparisons are easy. This pixel range will be determined by the site admins, since they must control the functionality of the entire site. Future Threadmeisters will be advisedmof these constraints & how to deal with them,

The point here is to generate a "true" history - both pictorial & text, for each model and model year. Not intended to be a wiki, as those can be violated. We WANT pure history.

Yeah, I know, it sounds a little cumbersome, but once it's made - it's bible. And... it will be here - the World! We will build it, we will confirm it. It will become gospel.

Now, I could call for threadmeisters right now - and we have numerous experts here. BUT, I want general feedback first. I am only this forum's Moderator - not an Admin. I'm a hireling, well I don't get paid, but am answerable to the Admins.

But, I want to get this rolling. Do away with all the nailed threads, etc. Create a REAL digital history of the 914.

Comments?

Any people out there volunteering to Threadmeisters for specific models/years?
Pat
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pat Garvey
post May 15 2008, 07:43 PM
Post #3


Do I or don't I...........?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,899
Joined: 24-March 06
From: SE PA, near Philly
Member No.: 5,765
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Pat Garvey @ May 13 2008, 08:59 PM) *

I've been giving this some more thought, aided by several of this forum's stalwarts.

Here's the consensus proposal:

Under the title of "Model Specific Information" will be eleven succint threads - one each for 1970, thru 1972 914'6's, one for 916's, one each for each 914-4 model thru 1976.

Each thread will be locked & controlled by the writer/"threadmeister" (as well as the forum admin).

All "threadmeisters" will be responsible for all posts to that thread, fielding suggested info & posting those items appropriate to that thread. This would be accomplished via PM's, since each thread will be locked.

Each of the eleven threads would be responsible for providing the same information, in a similar format (to be determined):
Page 1 - general shots - front, rear, side, plus general changes between years.
Page 2 - options, color, price.
Page 3 - front trunk.
Page 4 - rear trunk.
Page 5 - interior.
Page 6: appearance group/performance group - if applicable.
Page 7: special models withing the MY.

For now, all pic's would be approximately the same, and of the same pixel range - so comparisons are easy. This pixel range will be determined by the site admins, since they must control the functionality of the entire site. Future Threadmeisters will be advisedmof these constraints & how to deal with them,

The point here is to generate a "true" history - both pictorial & text, for each model and model year. Not intended to be a wiki, as those can be violated. We WANT pure history.

Yeah, I know, it sounds a little cumbersome, but once it's made - it's bible. And... it will be here - the World! We will build it, we will confirm it. It will become gospel.

Now, I could call for threadmeisters right now - and we have numerous experts here. BUT, I want general feedback first. I am only this forum's Moderator - not an Admin. I'm a hireling, well I don't get paid, but am answerable to the Admins.

But, I want to get this rolling. Do away with all the nailed threads, etc. Create a REAL digital history of the 914.

Comments?

Any people out there volunteering to Threadmeisters for specific models/years?
Pat

After thinking about this for a couple of days, I suspect (from a historical standpoint) that we may want to include histrical 914 race cars as another category. Anyone care to comment?

I'm on vacation, so I'm online seldom. Next week, we'll get this settled.

Just wanted to sow the seeds.
Pat
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Pat Garvey   Nailed topcs on this forum   May 3 2008, 05:25 PM
davep   They could go into a subforum like the Parts Vault...   May 3 2008, 06:04 PM
Pat Garvey   They could go into a subforum like the Parts Vaul...   May 3 2008, 07:44 PM
smontanaro   What about tagging them in a site like del.icio.us...   May 3 2008, 06:21 PM
Bleyseng   I second that!   May 4 2008, 09:12 AM
1970 Neun vierzehn   ....... I would like to think of the nailed post...   May 4 2008, 09:39 PM
davep   I don't disagree with a a thread for each mode...   May 4 2008, 10:04 PM
Pat Garvey   I don't disagree with a a thread for each mod...   May 5 2008, 07:51 PM
smontanaro   Guys, guys, guys... By setting up a static struct...   May 5 2008, 08:34 AM
Pat Garvey   Guys, guys, guys... By setting up a static struc...   May 5 2008, 07:36 PM
smontanaro   Skip, I'm a little unclear here. Are talking ...   May 5 2008, 09:32 PM
1970 Neun vierzehn   Pat, Do a trial thread on your own 914. It's ...   May 5 2008, 07:49 PM
dw914er   is it really neccessary though? We dont have too ...   May 6 2008, 01:08 AM
davep   Pat, Basically I propose a subforum, it could be c...   May 6 2008, 08:52 AM
Pat Garvey   Pat, Basically I propose a subforum, it could be ...   May 6 2008, 08:03 PM
McMark   :agree: with Dave It's nice to have the area-s...   May 6 2008, 11:47 AM
orthobiz   I love this site and don't contribute as much ...   May 6 2008, 09:19 PM
davep   Paul, exactly correct. That is why I suggest the t...   May 6 2008, 09:36 PM
Pat Garvey   Paul, exactly correct. That is why I suggest the ...   May 7 2008, 07:44 PM
McMark   I'll have to create the subforums. And, to be...   May 6 2008, 10:58 PM
1970 Neun vierzehn   I'll have to create the subforums. And, to b...   May 6 2008, 11:09 PM
orange914   I'll have to create the subforums. And, to b...   May 18 2008, 11:08 PM
McMark   I put up a test version to clarify, but now that i...   May 7 2008, 01:31 AM
1970 Neun vierzehn   I put up a test version to clarify, but now that ...   May 11 2008, 12:59 PM
McMark   No more ideas? :confused:   May 11 2008, 11:52 AM
smontanaro   No more ideas? I still think the tagging idea mer...   May 11 2008, 01:35 PM
Pat Garvey   I've been giving this some more thought, aided...   May 13 2008, 08:59 PM
Pat Garvey   I've been giving this some more thought, aide...   May 15 2008, 07:43 PM
pin31   Pat, I'll volunteer to be a "threadmeiste...   May 14 2008, 12:29 PM
orthobiz   Along similar lines, I think more general informat...   May 17 2008, 08:32 PM
Pat Garvey   Along similar lines, I think more general informa...   May 18 2008, 09:46 PM
davep   Pat, as I have suggested, I think the thing to do ...   May 18 2008, 10:20 PM
1970 Neun vierzehn   Pat, as I have suggested, I think the thing to do...   May 18 2008, 10:39 PM
orthobiz   OK, I'm back on topic. I think it's great ...   May 19 2008, 06:26 AM
davep   Kenny, this is not a fixit thread, that is what th...   May 19 2008, 08:19 AM
Pat Garvey   Kenny, this is not a fixit thread, that is what t...   May 19 2008, 05:35 PM
orange914   Kenny, this is not a fixit thread, that is what t...   May 19 2008, 06:08 PM
Pat Garvey   Kenny, this is not a fixit thread, that is what ...   May 19 2008, 07:41 PM
1970 Neun vierzehn   I'd think a good, clear profile photo would be...   May 19 2008, 09:34 PM
Pat Garvey   I'd think a good, clear profile photo would b...   May 20 2008, 08:45 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 04:09 AM