 Re: 1.8 with 96mm compared to stock 2.0? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Badass43 |
 Jun 22 2008, 11:43 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie  Group: Members Posts: 26 Joined: 11-June 08 From: Louisiana Member No.: 9,163 Region Association: None  |
Hey Guys,
Since I cant find a reasonably priced 2.0 to replace my 1.8 in my 1974, how would a dual carb 1.8 with 96mm PC, stock 1.8 heads and stock cam compare H.P. wise to a stock 2.0? If I changed the cam from stock to a carb cam would it increase H.P. worth the work and money involved? if so what would the H.P. be? Approx. I have some leads on 1.8 engines that are a lot cheaper than the 2.0 that has been offered and would leave me money for the PC upgrade plus leave me an extra $1,800.00 that I don't have right now anyway. Randy |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Borderline |
Jun 23 2008, 02:15 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 720 Joined: 8-February 05 From: San Juan Bautista, CA Member No.: 3,577 Region Association: Northern California |
My 1911:
Len Hoffman modified 1.8 heads Elgin cam 9.5:1 CR euro-headers weber 40's put out just over 100HP at the rear wheels on a chassis dyno. Depending on what you believe the tranny efficiency to be, that is ~120 HP un-corrected @ the flywheel. I like it! The only problem is the head temps are a little high. Go with the Raby cam! |
|
|
|
| justme |
Jun 29 2008, 09:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 187 Joined: 1-January 07 From: southampton ma atlantic northeast Member No.: 7,413 Region Association: North East States |
QUOTE(Borderline @ Jun 23 2008, 12:15 PM)  My 1911: Len Hoffman modified 1.8 heads Elgin cam 9.5:1 CR euro-headers weber 40's put out just over 100HP at the rear wheels on a chassis dyno. Depending on what you believe the tranny efficiency to be, that is ~120 HP un-corrected @ the flywheel. I like it! The only problem is the head temps are a little high. Go with the Raby cam! Hi Bill, Just wondering which Elgin cam you used & grind? Thanks |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Badass43 Re: 1.8 with 96mm compared to stock 2.0? Jun 22 2008, 11:43 AM
vesnyder Randy - I will chime in here. I just took a 1.8 a... Jun 22 2008, 02:50 PM r_towle Short stroked motors are alot of fun.
Go for it.
... Jun 22 2008, 03:58 PM Dave_Darling A good cam would let you get more power out of the... Jun 22 2008, 11:53 PM orthobiz And if he kept the stock FI, what's the most h... Jun 23 2008, 06:31 AM r_towle well the 2056 can get 120ish HP, I would not expec... Jun 23 2008, 07:12 AM 396 Good info guys- now if one was to do this combo. W... Jun 23 2008, 08:15 AM Brando Jake sells both J&E Forged pistons and KB pist... Jun 23 2008, 10:58 AM
396
Jake sells both J&E Forged pistons and KB pis... Jun 23 2008, 07:26 PM rdauenhauer
well the 2056 can get 120ish HP, I would not expe... Jun 23 2008, 12:09 PM james2 There are a couple of 914 2.0s on the samba cheap.... Jun 29 2008, 09:44 PM HAM Inc Those are damn good #'s Bill! Glad you got... Jun 23 2008, 05:31 PM r_towle
Those are damn good #'s Bill! Glad you go... Jun 23 2008, 08:15 PM HAM Inc Rich I've been tuned in to fuel economy for a ... Jun 24 2008, 09:09 AM kerensky Hmmm, what's the difference then between the 1... Jun 24 2008, 09:51 AM Jake Raby
Hmmm, what's the difference then between the ... Jun 24 2008, 11:12 AM kerensky
Hmmm, what's the difference then between the... Jun 24 2008, 01:41 PM Cupomeat 1.8 and 1.7 bottom ends are pretty much the same. ... Jun 24 2008, 11:02 AM Jake Raby James,
What the hell are you doing here??
"Ne... Jun 29 2008, 10:43 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 09:12 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.