 2.0 cam |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| grasshopperSR |
 Jul 17 2008, 09:59 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie  Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 6-May 06 From: South Georgia Member No.: 5,994  |
Has anyone had any experience with a "mild cam"? I am building up a street 2.0 and will keep the d-Jet and mechanical lifters. I am not building a racer, just trying to get another 5hp or so while replacing the cam.
Web .426/.426 262°/262° 224°/224° BarrySr. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| brant |
Jul 17 2008, 10:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,640 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains 
|
I haven't driven it yet
but I bought the Raby FI cam it is really really supposed to be the best of the mild cams. check his website there are different ones depending upon elevation 9550 and 9590 brant |
 |
|
Posts in this topic
grasshopperSR 2.0 cam Jul 17 2008, 09:59 PM
mstein95 Barry -
I put a Raby/Webcam 9550 (sorry don't... Jul 17 2008, 10:53 PM
blitZ I have Jakes 9550 cam in my 2056 w/Djet. It reall... Jul 18 2008, 06:44 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 11:32 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.