Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> SOT: Boxster checklist, couple questions
stateofidleness
post Jul 30 2008, 02:37 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 1-September 07
From: Canyon Lake, Texas!
Member No.: 8,065
Region Association: None



Hey guys,
gettin' serious about replacing my high mileage '98 chevy blazer and
would like to move to a boxster.
ive done some (read not much) research on them and have seen that
2.5L models have RMS issues. seems to be only main issue with them so far

I am talking to someone who has a 55,000 mile '98 model which is listed as an "S". what im wondering is, did they even have an S model in '98 and if the seller truly doesnt know, is there something on the car that would identify 100% as an S model? (badging, engine, etc)

Other things I should look out for when checking it out/test driving it?

It was also listed as a 5speed.. Wouldnt all S models be 6 speed?

Thanks so much!

oh yea.. what would be a decent price for a '98 S (if it actually is) in very good condition and all service records with no issues?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
stateofidleness
post Jul 30 2008, 04:44 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 1-September 07
From: Canyon Lake, Texas!
Member No.: 8,065
Region Association: None



was wondering that.. would a replacement engine be a red flag or a bonus?

good that it's a new engine, but could mean other trouble?

should i pass on this one and set my sights on maybe a '00 or later?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ferg
post Jul 30 2008, 04:46 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,948
Joined: 8-January 03
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 116
Region Association: None



QUOTE(stateofidleness @ Jul 30 2008, 02:44 PM) *

was wondering that.. would a replacement engine be a red flag or a bonus?

good that it's a new engine, but could mean other trouble?

should i pass on this one and set my sights on maybe a '00 or later?



Like anything, buy the best one you can find, and afford, they made a ton of them...

Here is a good read on the early case issues and the two types of failures, taken from the pca Q&A

With the introduction of the Boxster, Porsche teamed up with Kolbenschmidt to manufacture their new water-cooled engine. These engines were to utilize the newly introduced Lokasil liners. The liners themselves offer a higher friction-free service area. This is most useful in regard to not only the longevity of the cylinder but the ever-growing higher mileage service interval. The cases experienced several issues starting with their porosity. In 1997 many of these newly released engines seeped oil through the cases themselves. This seepage was due to a problem in the manufacturing process. When the cases are made in a high-pressure die-casting, the air in the die has to escape. Should the alloy enter too fast and not let all the air out, trapped air pockets are the result. These pockets produce a porous area. This area would then allow seepage of the oil. The reason it was generally oil and not coolant leakage was due to the casting process. The air was trapped in the bottom to center rear of the castings, which housed the oil.

Another well-known problem was the liner failures in late 1998 to early 1999. This would translate into only the 1999 model year do to production dates.

These failures were also due to a manufacturing process. The cylinder liners are created from an alloy made abrasion resistant by adding silicon. Prior to casting the crankcase, the cylinder liners are fixed in position by an operator, then surrounded by a conventional aluminum alloy casting. This is done by inserting the pre-formed cylinder liners (manufactured by Plochingen-based Ceram Tec AG in a special freeze casting process) into the die. The dies are then closed and a high-pressure die casting (HPDC) and squeeze casting (SC) are utilized to achieve this. Three casting machines with a closing force of 1800 tons are used for this purpose. The advantage of the Lokasil process is that the silicon is applied only where it is needed. Lokasil base material costs less than Alusil and is easier to process. These liners or pre-forms are of high silicon content (20-27 percent) and offer a high reduction of friction. Kolbenschmidt holds the patent to Lokasil and is also known for their Alusil and Galnikal piston liners. Lokasil is a "sacrificial" bore liner comprised of silicon fibers in a binding that, when inserted into the block mold, burns out the fibers, leaving the high-content silicon surface directly in the bores. This actually allows the “sacrificial” liner to become one with the block thus eliminating a separate part in the block.

In 1998 Kolbenschmidt’s casting machine was damaged. The time required to repair the machine could have slowed Boxster production down severely unless a fix was found. The solution was to reline some not-quite-perfect blocks that were on hand. Most of these blocks had a casting defect or a porosity problem in at least one cylinder. The fix was simple and absolutely acceptable to standards when done correctly. Kolbenschmidt began the process of the repairs until the casting machine was fixed. This process started by boring out the failed cylinder to allow for the insertion of the liner. There is also a groove cut around the top of the cylinder to keep the sleeve from dropping. This groove is approximately 2.0mm larger than the size of the cylinder’s width and goes down approximately 4.5mm. The next step was the insertion of these liners. It was decided to press the liners in the blocks. This is where the error occurred. Some of these liners were pressed in at a higher rate than the top retaining ring could handle. This would then fracture the ring at the top of the liner. When this ring failed under operating conditions, it was catastrophic. The ring itself would fall apart inside the combustion chamber. At this time the piston would force this debris up into the cylinder head. The piston rings would grab the liner and pull it down from the momentum of the crankshaft. Some of these engines were replaced from coolant loss before they totally self destructed in this fashion. This was due to the ring starting to come apart but not fully. This would compromise the sealing of the head gasket and cause the coolant to either be burnt or expelled from the combustion pressure.

Porsche has not divulged exactly how many engines this actually occurred in other than a broad range of 2.5 engines in late 1998-early 1999. Nor have they released any engine numbers that have had sleeves installed. Generally speaking, the problem occurred within the first several thousand miles. They have been very good in correcting this for their customers in and out of warranty.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
stateofidleness   SOT: Boxster checklist   Jul 30 2008, 02:37 PM
Root_Werks   97 2.5's didn't share the same troubles as...   Jul 30 2008, 02:46 PM
Root_Werks   Oh, and 6spd didn't come out on anything 986 r...   Jul 30 2008, 02:47 PM
stateofidleness   so it COULD possibly be an S model   Jul 30 2008, 02:52 PM
roadster fan   No S until 2000, tho there were 2.7 liter cars bef...   Jul 30 2008, 02:55 PM
stateofidleness   he's asking 15,500 for it (still unconfirmed i...   Jul 30 2008, 03:01 PM
roadster fan   I have not been able to find an '00 S for un...   Jul 31 2008, 02:41 AM
brant   what does "RMS" stand for and what issue...   Jul 30 2008, 04:28 PM
Ferg   what does "RMS" stand for and what issu...   Jul 30 2008, 04:36 PM
Matt Meyer   RMS= rear main seal The porous block issue is oft...   Jul 30 2008, 04:41 PM
stateofidleness   was wondering that.. would a replacement engine be...   Jul 30 2008, 04:44 PM
Ferg   was wondering that.. would a replacement engine b...   Jul 30 2008, 04:46 PM
Root_Werks   Yup, what most above said. I think the rule of th...   Jul 30 2008, 04:53 PM
stateofidleness   sounds safe. from what ya'll are saying thoug...   Jul 30 2008, 05:04 PM
Ferg   sounds safe. from what ya'll are saying thou...   Jul 30 2008, 05:08 PM
TROJANMAN   There was a great article on how to buy a used box...   Jul 30 2008, 05:08 PM
Jake Raby   In our Boxster development we have seen numerous i...   Jul 30 2008, 05:18 PM
stateofidleness   dumb question, is a 986 the same a boxster? thank...   Jul 30 2008, 06:05 PM
Jake Raby   Boxster= Typ 986 The 3.2 is the best engine, its ...   Jul 30 2008, 06:49 PM
roadster fan   :hijacked: ummmmm Jake uhhhhhhhhhh........... ar...   Jul 31 2008, 02:52 AM
9146986   I would try to find at least an '00. Tiptroni...   Jul 31 2008, 08:21 AM
stateofidleness   ok guys today might be the day! goin' to l...   Aug 22 2008, 01:24 PM
Racer   I went looking for a Boxster in '06. After re...   Aug 22 2008, 05:53 PM
stateofidleness   seems like every time i have it lined up to look a...   Aug 22 2008, 06:36 PM
9146986   FWIW the Tiptronic cars (911 or 986) are very rare...   Aug 23 2008, 08:05 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 10:45 AM