![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
horizontally-opposed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,456 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
The current post about r_towle's son and his close call with his 914 and a tree has been weighing heavily on me. It has also reminded me why it's important to be thankful to those who engineered the cars so well so long ago.
I posted the below in that thread in response to pictures of a race car with a ton of tubes in the floor to prevent intrusion, but think the subject probably deserves a thread of its own, and that it belongs in the Garage for several reasons, but mainly so the maximum brain trust can have its input. What we need is experienced minds, willing to think unconventionally about how to maximize our chances in the event of a collision on the road, track, or autocross. I'm not sure I see roll bars as the solution, especially for street cars (and ESPECIALLY if it means your head is next to a nice, über hard bar), but I sure am willing to listen. Anyone who has experience with real crash testing or knowledge of applicable physics would be especially valued here. Now, to my original post: As to the bar-laden floor in the race car pictured above, it certainly looks like it will be harder for things to intrude into the cabin in the (let's hope VERY unlikely) event of an impact like the one seen in this thread. However, one has to wonder if the energy absorbed by the 914 in this instance didn't play a part in preserving the lives of the two kids in the 914. Its "give" took a big chunk of the wallop out of what those kids would have experienced had there been rigid bars there, and the result (I suspect, but you'd have to do an extensive study to find out) was that their necks were subjected to a slightly lesser impact and their internals didn't have to slow down quite as quickly. If the tree or pole had entered the cockpit a couple of feet back, it would have been a different story, of course. This demonstrates the erratic nature of car "accidents" and the difficulty (impossibility?) that faces engineers as they try to protect occupants. I think about the C-GT fatality in Fontana (having driven a C-GT there just before it happened...) and what killed those two was a side impact in which nothing intruded but the car simply came to a stop too quickly, too instantly. Their necks' didn't have much of a chance, if any. I sometimes wonder if they would have done better without helmets. I've been thinking a lot about safety of late, and very unconventionally. Not so much because I think we should ditch helmets, HANS devices, etc., but because I think we should really be considering the lessons learned in production-car crash test engineering and how they might be adapted for race cars. Good seats are another key, and I agree with Patrick Long that we should modernize old race cars with modern seats, and wear HANS with helmets out there (extra weight of the helmet makes things tougher on your neck). Problem is, all this is expensive, and I've seen very little discussion about how HANS or similar devices work without harnesses, i.e. with 3-point belts. Which then makes me wonder if those who autocross are actually less safe in modern street cars with a helmet on. Airbags and full-face helmets are just one thing that come to mind... This is a hard subject, but there are good lessons for all of us to learn as we consider it. The best news is we aren't studying it in tragedy with re: to Rocket. And for that, I am very, very thankful. So let's learn from this near miss together... pete |
![]() ![]() |
J P Stein |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Irrelevant old fart ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None ![]() |
I got rear ended while sitting in my RED pick-up truck at a stop sign.
In 40 odd years of driving, that's it. I admit, there is some luck involved, but I consider driving a job that requires all your attention. I also operate under the assumption that everyone out on the road is trying to kill me & the sumbitch that can get me ain't been born yet. This requires planning moves, looking ahead and spotting the clown that is really trying to kill me....as I said, a full time job. My DD is a 93 MR2. If there is a jerk that is gonna cut in line, they will pick the small car 95% of the time....that would be me. That guy usually gets in, but I let them know I'm there....assholes. I have an ego also, but it ain't worth any dents in Mr.2. I drove my caged 914 on the street for a while.....right up to the time I bonked my haid on the upper longitudinal bar.....with a helmet on, 3 point belt and padded bar. Knocked me goofy. Just hit a few bumps on a skid pad. The upper section of the cage went away soon there after. I have seen some real nice door intrusion bars here of late, but what about the head/neck? Nope, the Cap'n has the right idea. Learn to drive to avoid the idiots that don't know how.....then hope for some luck. The crash worthiness of a 914 is moot if you don't have one. Nothing is safe or safer under the proper circumstances. Excuse me while I go knock wood. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 03:21 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |