Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: New Formula 1 Championship format..., ... Potentially...
BMXerror
post Dec 29 2008, 10:50 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,705
Joined: 8-April 06
From: Hesperia Ca
Member No.: 5,842



This may have been posted in the 'Box' already (not sure), but I thought it deserved a look in the garage.
http://www.formula1.com/news/interviews/2008/12/8775.html
Well, what do you think. I think, bad idea! I don't think the 'best driver' is necessarily the guy who can go the fastest on a given day. That's what qualifying is for. The whole reason we have an eight or ten month championship, and even 60-70 lap races for that matter, is to see who can consistently pull together fast laps in order to produce a good result. If that weren't the case, Formula 1 would just be a multi-million dollar autocross, with everyone out there competing for TTOD! I know it's supposed to encourage hard wheel to wheel racing, but most of the time races aren't decided that way. We get some wheel to wheel at the beginning, and then things calm down, and through the coarse of the race we see which team has got the car of the day and which driver is the most dialed into the track, and the drivers all spread out based on the times they are REALLY, consistently capable of. It's not because any one of them is not trying! If they CAN catch up and race to the end, they do!
I don't think we should penalize a driver like Robert Kubica for not bringing in lots of wins in an outclassed car, even though he's out there keeping the top teams running for their lives every race weekend. And if he can place 2nd or 3rd more consistently than some leadfoot can land some sporadic wins in between meetings with the wall and engine failures, I think he deserves to take it! And by the way, most of the time it works out to where the guy with the most wins takes the championship anyways. The fact that a consistent bride's maid has a chance to lead the championship is only proof that you have a good, close fight on your hands, and I don't think you should mess with that! I don't think it's a bad thing that BMW and Renault know the don't have the outright speed and are approaching the fight a different way.
The long and the short of it: I think that this move would just make impossible the already near impossible task of toppling McLaren and Ferrari, and result in a bunch of busted machinery. I think what they're really looking for is marketable carnage, NASCAR style. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) My $.02
Mark D.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
GeorgeRud
post Dec 30 2008, 12:35 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,725
Joined: 27-July 05
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 4,482
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Probably would cause a mechanical mess, but just as it was always the France's NASCAR, and Bishop's IMSA, it's Bernie's F1. If he wants it that way, it seems to get done. If he doesn't, it doesn't get done.

How exactly did this used car salesman get to such a position of power? He must be making a lot of people lots of money (besides himself of course).

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th July 2025 - 11:46 AM