Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> New Type lV Build, Done Quick & Cheap
Type 4 Unleashed
post Jun 5 2009, 12:47 AM
Post #1


CREATIVE TYPE lV ENGINEERING
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 787
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Aliso Viejo, ca
Member No.: 2,231
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
jmill
post Jul 23 2009, 07:26 PM
Post #2


Green Hornet
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,449
Joined: 9-May 08
From: Racine, Wisconsin
Member No.: 9,038
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I would think you'd get worse mileage with a heavy flywheel. I thought they were beefy to handle the heat. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ArtechnikA
post Jul 23 2009, 07:33 PM
Post #3


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jmill @ Jul 23 2009, 09:26 PM) *

I would think you'd get worse mileage with a heavy flywheel. I thought they were beefy to handle the heat.

Mostly they're heavy to improve idle and keep idiots who can't handle a clutch from stalling at stoplights.

Consider this - when the car is in motion, THE ENTIRE CAR is attached to the rotating mass...

There was a guy from Hawaii trying to promote the 'heavy flywheel makes for better mileage' theory about 20 years ago. You can tell how god an idea it is by observing all the 100-lb flywheels on Hondas and such...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Jul 23 2009, 09:50 PM
Post #4


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(ArtechnikA @ Jul 23 2009, 05:33 PM) *

There was a guy from Hawaii trying to promote the 'heavy flywheel makes for better mileage' theory about 20 years ago. You can tell how god an idea it is by observing all the 100-lb flywheels on Hondas and such...

Well, there is a tradeoff... acceleration. And a point of diminishing return... which I'm sure is well short of 100lbs. A heavier flywheel will keep the engine speed more constant, which will result in better fuel economy. How much better? I dunno. Probably still depends more on the driver.

I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under his Pinto. He'd spool it up, shut the engine off, and drive home on the flywheel. Regenerative braking put energy back into the flywheel.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jul 25 2009, 05:08 AM
Post #5


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,990
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Todd Enlund @ Jul 23 2009, 10:50 PM) *

I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under his Pinto. He'd spool it up, shut the engine off, and drive home on the flywheel. Regenerative braking put energy back into the flywheel.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bs.gif)
Do you have any idea how much mass would be required to actually accomplish that? The only way to put energy back into the flywheel is to increase its rotational velocity. A rather complex system would be required to transfer braking energy to the flywheel.
An engineer friend told me that BMW was trying to develop a flywheel system and killed someone during testing. They didn't have the test cell adequately built to protect people from a runaway flywheel, and something went wrong. If it was a good, safe idea and not too complex it would have already been implemented by a car mfr.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Jul 31 2009, 03:20 PM
Post #6


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Jul 25 2009, 03:08 AM) *

QUOTE(Todd Enlund @ Jul 23 2009, 10:50 PM) *

I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under his Pinto. He'd spool it up, shut the engine off, and drive home on the flywheel. Regenerative braking put energy back into the flywheel.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bs.gif)
Do you have any idea how much mass would be required to actually accomplish that? The only way to put energy back into the flywheel is to increase its rotational velocity. A rather complex system would be required to transfer braking energy to the flywheel.

May be BS, but I came across it while I was doing research on alternative power in 1982. I have always been skeptical of the regenerative braking claim... as I recall, it was in an issue of Pop Science or some such. Braking energy could be fed back into the flywheel via an electrical motor... not terribly complex. The most complex part of the claim would be converting braking energy into electrical energy. It was a test mule built by a college professor.

The article also did not say how far his drive home was... I assume it could be measured in blocks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Type 4 Unleashed   New Type lV Build   Jun 5 2009, 12:47 AM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jun 5 2009, 12:48 AM
johannes   :popcorn:   Jun 5 2009, 02:36 AM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 22 2009, 07:59 PM
type2man   :popcorn: :popcorn: Keep it comin along, were all...   Jul 22 2009, 08:39 PM
r_towle   Why are the rod bolts welded? Why are there little...   Jul 22 2009, 09:32 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 22 2009, 10:13 PM
Borderline   A 2.6 Ltr will make one hell of a street engine...   Jul 22 2009, 10:44 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 29 2009, 01:52 AM
HAM Inc   Why not just degree it and find out for yourself...   Jul 23 2009, 08:59 AM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 23 2009, 11:18 AM
Chris Hamilton   I don't quite understand going with the stock ...   Jul 23 2009, 12:05 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 23 2009, 05:42 PM
Chris Hamilton   I autocross my car and drive it on the freeway. Di...   Jul 23 2009, 05:54 PM
jmill   I would think you'd get worse mileage with a h...   Jul 23 2009, 07:26 PM
ArtechnikA   I would think you'd get worse mileage with a ...   Jul 23 2009, 07:33 PM
Todd Enlund   There was a guy from Hawaii trying to promote the...   Jul 23 2009, 09:50 PM
Racer Chris   I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under hi...   Jul 25 2009, 05:08 AM
Todd Enlund   I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under h...   Jul 31 2009, 03:20 PM
r_towle   [quote name='Racer Chris' post='1195124' date='Ju...   Jul 31 2009, 04:15 PM
maf914   I know of a guy that put a huge flywheel under h...   Aug 3 2009, 01:54 PM
Racer Chris   :agree: By itself the weight of the flywheel has ...   Jul 23 2009, 09:49 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 23 2009, 10:08 PM
Jake Raby   Light flywheels impact MPG because they require mo...   Jul 23 2009, 10:13 PM
kwales   The heavier flywheel means higher system inertial ...   Jul 24 2009, 05:05 PM
Chris Hamilton   Hmmm.... that may help explain why there are no ...   Jul 24 2009, 05:31 PM
r_towle   Who cares.... Show more pics of the motor build.....   Jul 24 2009, 09:27 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 31 2009, 02:42 PM
Todd Enlund   I found out something interesting today, initial ...   Jul 31 2009, 03:23 PM
Chris Hamilton   Who manufactures those 103s?   Jul 31 2009, 02:43 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 31 2009, 02:52 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Jul 31 2009, 09:24 PM
r_towle   looking good. Can you come up with a safe crank f...   Jul 31 2009, 10:42 PM
Type 4 Unleashed   :WTF:   Aug 1 2009, 12:54 AM
Chris Hamilton   looking good. Can you come up with a safe crank ...   Aug 3 2009, 01:45 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th July 2025 - 01:24 PM