Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Torque setting for head nuts?
KaptKaos
post May 16 2010, 04:25 PM
Post #1


Family
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,009
Joined: 23-April 03
From: Near Wausau
Member No.: 607
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Haynes says 23 lb and give a tightening diagram.

That 23 lbs included the old head gaskets, which I am not using.

Does the torque setting need to be tighter without head gaskets?

If so, what?

TIA
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Cap'n Krusty
post May 17 2010, 02:18 PM
Post #2


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



I see my name, but don't know why it's in a post.

My opinion after 37 years of building 914 engines:

A: Yes VW dropped the head gaskets, BUT ONLY ON THE 2.0 BUS ENGINES, and only when doing a rebuild. They also changed the head design. If you leave out the gaskets but use the original 2.0 BUS HEADS, you must add a spacer to the base of each cylinder to bring the compression back to specs. Porsche NEVER dropped the head gaskets, and never specified or suggested they be eliminated.

Jake has had great success with deleting the head gaskets. He has his own reasons, and his own experience. His experience is much shorter than mine, but he has done far more engines than I, and has done an amazing amount of R&D on the T4.
HOWEVER, I doubt he deletes the gaskets on all his engines because "VW did it".
That is a LAME excuse, and not even any kind of defensible reason, and it's taken out of context.

B: Competent machinists use a vertical mill to surface 914 heads. Mills are huge, heavy, and designed to deliver precise, repeatable cuts to the work at hand. You're taking a pair of matched precision surfaces, separated by an inch or more of material, and lapping them by hand? WHAT ARE YOU THINKING! I, for one, am not blessed with either the eyesight or the hand/eye coordination to lap a pair of cylinders to a cylinder head with any sort of planar accuracy, especially to .0001". How do you know you're holding the cylinders at precisely 90 degrees to the surface of the head? How about the depth of cut? I doubt you, or anyone else on this planet, can match the accuracy of that mill in the hands of a competent machinist. If your machinist isn't all that competent, we've just moved to another subject altogether ................

The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post May 17 2010, 04:32 PM
Post #3


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ May 17 2010, 01:18 PM) *

I see my name, but don't know why it's in a post.


My mistake Krusty - due to half-zymers, when my brain farted & went from KapnKaos to you when I wrote that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
... apologies!

But you are reinforcing the "use the head gaskets" line that I've heard too, & don't think I'd drop the gaskets off the 914 engines for mine - and you've been around about as long as my guy Hans down in Huntington Beach, so you certainly know!

The Vans I was referring to above were the waterboxers - not 2.0 Type IV Buses - just to be clear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
KaptKaos   Torque setting for head nuts?   May 16 2010, 04:25 PM
McMark   Nope. Tighten them to 12 first. Use the correct ...   May 16 2010, 04:27 PM
KaptKaos   Mark, So tighten them to 12, and then go through ...   May 16 2010, 04:56 PM
detoxcowboy   I think mcMark means that it is better to creep up...   May 16 2010, 08:56 PM
KaptKaos   I get that. Make sense. Should I loosen and re-t...   May 16 2010, 09:11 PM
craig downs   Yes   May 16 2010, 09:15 PM
detoxcowboy   Yes, peace of mind, easier now.. be certain w/ les...   May 16 2010, 09:28 PM
KaptKaos   Got it. Thanks guys.   May 16 2010, 10:52 PM
Tom_T   Haynes says 23 lb and give a tightening diagram. ...   May 17 2010, 12:24 AM
KaptKaos   It's my understanding that VW even changed the...   May 17 2010, 08:51 AM
detoxcowboy   It's my understanding that VW even changed th...   May 17 2010, 09:18 AM
Tom_T   Krusty - the torquing tip or rule of thumb that my...   May 17 2010, 01:36 PM
Cap'n Krusty   I see my name, but don't know why it's in ...   May 17 2010, 02:18 PM
Tom_T   I see my name, but don't know why it's in...   May 17 2010, 04:32 PM
KaptKaos   When I took her apart, there weren't any head ...   May 17 2010, 05:35 PM
Tom_T   When I took her apart, there weren't any head...   May 17 2010, 05:53 PM
detoxcowboy   When I took her apart, there weren't any hea...   May 17 2010, 06:44 PM
Tom_T   I bet your assuming what you have in your 914. ...   May 17 2010, 06:51 PM
KaptKaos   Here's a Jake post for reference: http://www....   May 17 2010, 05:49 PM
jaxdream   That's nice to know , how about the 1.7 and th...   May 17 2010, 06:34 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th June 2025 - 06:42 AM