Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> motor questions
realred914
post Aug 2 2010, 10:10 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



in building a big 2.o liter (probably will be a 2.1 liter when done) we find the engien case is worn out. What differences is any are there in useing a 1.7 or 1.8 case for the build? I understand some cases do not have the windage tray. any other differences?


also what are recommended brands of pistons. I am looking for a big bore more than likely (2.1 liter) to run with the stock D-jet

thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
realred914
post Aug 3 2010, 07:46 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



thanks all, excellent advice.

yes the tuna can sure does work for reducing oil starvation. i found with out it, I had to keep th eoil level at the top line religously else cornering would do me in, if the oil was much below the top fill line, even hard breaking would slosh the oil away from the pick up! But I still kept wacking the tuna can bolt head. I think I will try the windage tray modification.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 01:42 PM