![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Mueller |
![]()
Post
#1
|
914 Freak! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,155 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Does anyone have dyno numbers or know where to point me to for a comparison between the two different types of ignition??
Knowing that I can turn my regular distributor into a fully electronic programmable electronic ignition (okay, it'll still have the rotor which must distribute the spark) I was wondering what the crankfire has over the distributor ignition besides 0 moving parts that can wear out. for the distributor the path for the spark still needs to go from the coil>rotor>cap>sparkplug wire>sparkplug.... the crankfire is coil>sparkplug wire>sparkplug what effect does the rotor and cap have on ignition if everything is the same (advance curve and coil rating)???? |
![]() ![]() |
airsix |
![]()
Post
#2
|
I have bees in my epiglotis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,196 Joined: 7-February 03 From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State) Member No.: 266 ![]() |
QUOTE(Mueller @ Mar 17 2004, 04:53 PM) I was wondering what the crankfire has over the distributor ignition besides 0 moving parts that can wear out. Hi Mike! Wow, what a coincidence. Guess what I just did? I just came in from driving my 914 for the first time with crank-fired ignition! I can see it in the papers now "Monkey sucessfully fabricates hall-effect crank possition sensor for 914" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) Seriously. Remember a few years ago when I was trying to fab a crank possition sensor with magnets mounted in the rim of the fan pulley? Well the failure of that project has been bugging me for years so tonight I went out to the garage and dug out all the pieces and tried again. It wasn't the physical design that was the problem it was the wiring. This time I shielded the signal leads all the way to the ECU and bridged them to +12v with 1k ohm resistors so that when pulled to ground they would make a nice crisp square wave. It worked! Engine fired right up, I set the timing baseline with the laptop and went for a drive. It was sweet. If you recall I was previously running a Crane optical sensor in the dizzy. With the optical trigger there was much less spark scatter than with points, but there was still a noticeable amount. I think it's probably because even with a tight dizzy there is gear lash between the dizzy shaft and the crank, not to mention dizzy shaft wobble. I bet at idle speed that dizzy shaft is rattling back and forth across that gear lash. Running off the crank-trigger there is much less spark scatter as viewed with the timing light. The engine definitely idles more smoothly. I don't expect that there is really any more power - maybe a little, or like has been said - the potential now to extract a hair more, but nothing earth-shattering. It definitely seems smoother though, and I like that. It's still firing through the distributor for now (for spark distribution only - not timing or crank possition). I've got the coils for waste-spark but need another compatible ignition amplifier. As soon as I round one up I'll try to go distributorless and see what happens. -Ben M. (now with new improved crank-fire action) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 01:28 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |