Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: MS Server Question, HELP!, calling on the geeks ...
SirAndy
post May 26 2004, 09:49 AM
Post #1


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,245
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



sooo, on one (actually 2) of our servers running IIS, we get a lot of hack attempts lately. they're all of the same type, buffer overflow attacks on port 80.

i have all the latest security patches (Windows NT 4) and they are NOT compromising the box, that's the good news.

the bad news is, that lately, the type of attack has slightly changed and now they succeed in crashing IIS!

so here's the problem:
this box (or 2) run important eCommerce websites for me so closing port 80 or moving to another port is NOT an option.
moving to another OS is NOT an option. banning IP's is NOT a option (most of those kids are on dialup DSL, so i would have to block a whole range, most likely cutting out legit customers)
how can i run those websites without having IIS die on me a couple of times a day?

the only thing i can think of is to implement some sort of content filtering that removes malicious code before it gets to the web-server.
anyone here who has a running example of a setup like that?
what (good) firewalls have that sort of filtering and how much do they cost?

i'm at the end of the rope here ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/fighting19.gif)
Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
fiid
post May 27 2004, 12:44 PM
Post #2


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



Oh - and by "directly on the net" I mean "with a routable IP address". Put it on 192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x - that way there's no direct path to the machine from the outside, not can there be unless you specifically configure it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
SirAndy   OT: MS Server Question, HELP!   May 26 2004, 09:49 AM
boxsterfan   There are several tricks, but some copies of the I...   May 26 2004, 09:56 AM
SirAndy   nope, it's a simple HTTP request that has way ...   May 26 2004, 10:05 AM
mikester   Couple of questions... What version of IIS? I...   May 26 2004, 10:30 AM
boxsterfan   Could you post a log of the buffer overflow attack...   May 26 2004, 10:40 AM
KaptKaos   On a long term basis, I think you are best served ...   May 26 2004, 11:16 AM
brians914   :agree: Move on man!   May 26 2004, 11:20 AM
SirAndy   here's some stuff from the logs, the XXXXXXXX ...   May 26 2004, 11:23 AM
boxsterfan   Looks like a WEBDAV hack attempt. IIS4 does not su...   May 26 2004, 11:36 AM
KaptKaos  
QUOTE
  May 26 2004, 11:37 AM
dinomium   If you cant upgrade right now, I would start at SS...   May 26 2004, 11:38 AM
aircooledboy   These guys are all wet Andy. Clearly, your flux ca...   May 26 2004, 11:45 AM
SirAndy   :headbang: :hang: sooo, i go and get the lates...   May 26 2004, 12:23 PM
boxsterfan   SirAndy,


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th July 2025 - 10:16 AM