Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Model Specific Information

914/4: 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 914/6: 70 71 72

> on valences and vapor lock, a downside to originality
1970 Neun vierzehn
post Jul 1 2012, 01:05 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,199
Joined: 16-March 06
From: cincinnati, ohio
Member No.: 5,727



For thirty-one years I had run my 70/4 w/o a rear valence panel of any kind (see 3rd photo). After prolonged driving in hot weather or hard driving in warm weather (ie autocross), the car was afflicted with vapor lock (fuel pump in original location).
Keeping the gas tank mostly full helped alleviate the problem.

Now, since the OEM "deep" valence is in place (see 1st and 2nd photos), just a moderate run of 12 miles in warm temps causes vapor lock problems with an almost full tank of fresh gas. We all know that the factory installed a shorter valence later in the 914s' model run. One reason typically cited is the panels' tendency to collect debris and snow(!), but another less emphasized reason was no doubt the increase in engine compartment/rear trunk/under car temperatures.
The shortened rear valence and repositioned fuel pump no doubt greatly reduced the vapor lock problems but early 914/4s are still seriously afflicted if configured as originally built.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image

Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 06:10 PM