Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> turbo performance
nsyr
post Jun 3 2004, 04:47 PM
Post #1


Because I Can
**

Group: Members
Posts: 314
Joined: 16-May 04
From: Tampa, FL
Member No.: 2,073



I know there a few people out there with turbo 4's. Does anybody have any performance or reliability figures.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Sammy
post Jun 4 2004, 02:53 PM
Post #2


.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,190
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Orange, Ca
Member No.: 178



Intercoolers are not magic, they are just like most mechanical devices. They offer a performance increase in some cases, but at a cost.

Even the very best designed intercooler will have some restriction. if they didn't they wouldn't cool very well. This restriction reduces the efficiency of the turbo and can and will increase turbo lag.
The trade off is that they allow the tuner to run a little more boost because the cooler charge does not increase the combustion temperatures as much as a hot air intake and it is more dense.

BUT...... if we study the law from that guy names boyles or boils or whatever,
air doesn't get very hot if you only compress it a little. It is not linear, prolly more like exponential.

At around 3 psi boost you would most likely not have any benefit from an intercooler. The intake air would prolly only be about 10 degrees over ambient (guesstimating from past ezperience here, cut me some slack) Probably just the opposite, you would have negative effects from intercooling at that low of boost. The down side would outweigh the upside.

Even as high as 4 or 5 psi (depending on the turbo efficiency rating) there is little benefit to an intercooler.
At around 6 or 7 psi it starts to make a difference and is justified but at that point you usually need to look at the rest of the engine to see if it can go much higher in boost anywho. These numbers are approximations and generalities and there will always be an exception.

My SC is a good example.
I'm up to almost 7 psi with it with no pinging and no problems, but if I get into the boost for an extended time (like two full passes through the gears on boost) the intake system absorbs enough heat that it gets "heat soaked" and I notice a loss of performance and sometimes even a ping or two. In that case an intercooler would be of a benefit at as low as 6 or 7 psi boost.
I found the threashold and do plan to build a custom intercooler. If I were to keep the boost down to 4 or 5 psi I prolly wouldn't bother with the intercooler.
I also plan to recurve the dizzy to take out 5 degrees advance and also install another hobbs triggered injector. With all that i predict I can get above 8 psi, but I doubt I can go much higher than that reliably.

Plus the big question is, where the heck do you put an intercooler in a 914 without hacking the poor car all up? a 911 is relatively easy, a 914 is not. The trunk is about the only logical place and that would require a whole bunch of tricks and scoops and holes and louvers to get enough air flowing over it to keep it cool.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
nsyr   turbo performance   Jun 3 2004, 04:47 PM
Mueller   so far no one has stepped up to the plate and dyno...   Jun 3 2004, 05:02 PM
fiid   "Everyone knows you can't turbo a type IV" I ...   Jun 3 2004, 05:03 PM
Mueller  
QUOTE
  Jun 3 2004, 05:06 PM
fiid   It's not really easier - it just gives a real ...   Jun 3 2004, 05:09 PM
Mueller   you suck !!! hahahaha I'll be hap...   Jun 3 2004, 05:11 PM
fiid   Dude - I totally regret not returning your call -t...   Jun 3 2004, 05:18 PM
Mark Henry   Mueller, did you see what the monoball guy does on...   Jun 3 2004, 05:24 PM
Mueller   Hey Mark, no, I have not seen those SS rings befor...   Jun 3 2004, 05:33 PM
nsyr   i am considering the suby engine too. it wouldn...   Jun 3 2004, 05:35 PM
Eric_Shea   You can't put a Subaru engine in a 914 :lol:   Jun 3 2004, 06:13 PM
fiid   I can tell you that a 280Hp Subaru engine in a 914...   Jun 3 2004, 06:24 PM
Jake Raby   Hell, if my plots work out the way they are in sim...   Jun 3 2004, 09:18 PM
fiid   Jake - do you think the exiswting head attachment ...   Jun 4 2004, 12:12 AM
airsix  
  Jun 4 2004, 12:42 AM
Jake Raby   The studs that come with Nickies should hold about...   Jun 4 2004, 12:51 AM
fiid     Jun 4 2004, 12:54 AM
Jake Raby   Stock Type IV heads do not compliment a Turbo... ...   Jun 4 2004, 12:59 AM
Sammy   I really got to ask, did that person who told you ...   Jun 4 2004, 09:54 AM
andys   I wonder how many folks here actually have driven ...   Jun 4 2004, 10:37 AM
Jake Raby   I have never ridden in a 914 with a Turbo, but I h...   Jun 4 2004, 10:42 AM
Sammy   My best guess is that with the crap they call pump...   Jun 4 2004, 11:50 AM
Jake Raby   The stock intake port is amazing! The type IV ...   Jun 4 2004, 12:26 PM
lapuwali   I'd think intercooling was essential with an a...   Jun 4 2004, 12:34 PM
andys     Jun 4 2004, 01:31 PM
Sammy   Intercoolers are not magic, they are just like mos...   Jun 4 2004, 02:53 PM
lapuwali  
QUOTE
  Jun 4 2004, 03:27 PM
fiid   I think there is some truth to what my source is s...   Jun 4 2004, 05:35 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 01:26 AM