Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Valve adjustment issues., Weird...
Bob L.
post Aug 13 2012, 12:41 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 848
Joined: 7-August 11
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 13,411
Region Association: Southwest Region



I have been cleaning a new to me engine to put in my '73. It's a '76 2.0 D-jet- stock valve train. After re-installing the rocker arms I went around and adjusted the valves using Cap'n Krusties' Rocking method and it seemed to be going fine. After getting all valves done I decided to check them all again. This is where it gets weird. While checking one rocker/valve I notice that another one seems to be looser than it was when I set it. I understand how it could get tighter as the cam rotates and closes the valve.
According to the rocking method the Rocker being adjusted is on the backside of the cam (opposite the lobe) and therefor as loose as it should get.

So, why Can I measure a greater gap when It should only be able to get smaller? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
Apparently I'm not the only one who has run into this.

Also, I get different gap readings when using the piston at TDC method. Some are the same, some loose or tight.

This is my first time working on the rockers/valves, FWIW.
Let the learning begin(continue)!
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Dave_Darling
post Aug 13 2012, 03:22 PM
Post #2


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,991
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



In my case:

Engine still out of the car, with the transmission still on it. Valves adjusted at TDC, according to the mark on the flywheel. Re-checked valves using the opposite-rocking method. Any valve whose counterpart on the same cylinder was open had greater clearance than was set at TDC.

I never could get an answer as to why that might be. The only thing I could think of was that the rocker shaft was moving. But I did torque it down to the correct spec, 10 lb-ft.

I'm waiting to hear any good answers as well!

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Valy
post Aug 13 2012, 04:37 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,677
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Aug 13 2012, 02:22 PM) *

In my case:

Engine still out of the car, with the transmission still on it. Valves adjusted at TDC, according to the mark on the flywheel. Re-checked valves using the opposite-rocking method. Any valve whose counterpart on the same cylinder was open had greater clearance than was set at TDC.

I never could get an answer as to why that might be. The only thing I could think of was that the rocker shaft was moving. But I did torque it down to the correct spec, 10 lb-ft.

I'm waiting to hear any good answers as well!

--DD


Worn out cam bearings? The rocker shaft is not the only thing that can move...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 12:08 PM