Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Valve adjustment issues., Weird...
Bob L.
post Aug 13 2012, 12:41 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 848
Joined: 7-August 11
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 13,411
Region Association: Southwest Region



I have been cleaning a new to me engine to put in my '73. It's a '76 2.0 D-jet- stock valve train. After re-installing the rocker arms I went around and adjusted the valves using Cap'n Krusties' Rocking method and it seemed to be going fine. After getting all valves done I decided to check them all again. This is where it gets weird. While checking one rocker/valve I notice that another one seems to be looser than it was when I set it. I understand how it could get tighter as the cam rotates and closes the valve.
According to the rocking method the Rocker being adjusted is on the backside of the cam (opposite the lobe) and therefor as loose as it should get.

So, why Can I measure a greater gap when It should only be able to get smaller? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
Apparently I'm not the only one who has run into this.

Also, I get different gap readings when using the piston at TDC method. Some are the same, some loose or tight.

This is my first time working on the rockers/valves, FWIW.
Let the learning begin(continue)!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
timothy_nd28
post Aug 13 2012, 10:21 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,299
Joined: 25-September 07
From: IN
Member No.: 8,154
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I had the same exact issue with my previous engine. After tearing apart that engine, I found a worn cam with flats everywhere. After installing a new cam, all that weirdness went away. I would think a descent temp repair for the meantime, installing hydraulic lifters, till you can tear down your engine?
I found it extremely helpful watching the Jake Raby bug me not movie. The video is free on the pirate bay site.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aircooledtechguy
post Aug 13 2012, 11:56 PM
Post #3


The Aircooledtech Guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,966
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Anacortes, WA
Member No.: 9,730
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(tim_nd @ Aug 13 2012, 09:21 PM) *

I would think a descent temp repair for the meantime, installing hydraulic lifters, till you can tear down your engine?


Well meaning advice, but. . . doing so is a disaster in the making. Putting a fresh set of lifters onto a worn cam, is about the fastest way to remove those little, but necessary bumps that open the valves, at the same time introducing tons of metal into your motor. Adding hydraulic lifters to a worn-out solid lifter cam will only accelerate the cam's destruction. For your motor's sake, DO NOT DO THAT

It's easy to pull a push rod tube, slide a lifter out and inspect the cam. If you pull the motor, you can also remove the oil pump so you can inspect the cam gear rivets which can get loose and cause the cam gear to move side-to-side and cause all kinds of cam/lifter/valve adjustment issues.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 09:28 AM