Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 3.2/901 conversion KEP Clutch & PP issue
larryM
post Oct 27 2012, 01:33 PM
Post #1


emoze
***

Group: Members
Posts: 891
Joined: 1-January 03
From: mid- California
Member No.: 65
Region Association: Northern California



.UPDATED _ solution found - see below

anybody seen this before? Solutions ??

I have a new-in-box KEP-1 pressure plate that I purchased thru GPR of San Luis Obispo (German Parts & Restoration) as part of a complete FW-Clutch conversion package to fit a 901 transaxle to a 3.2 engine


. Attached Image

Attached Image

today I finally tried to install the clutch

the PP bolt holes are not matching - the edges are about 1.5-2.0 mm inset from the matching bolt holes of the flywheel -

impossible to bolt up unless I hog out the existing holes in the KEP-1 PP

further measuring shows that the OD of the KEP-1 PP is maybe 1.5-2mm mm larger than the ID of the Porsche ring gear

looks like - it would require a big hammer or some grinding on the OD to make this fit correctly

the label on the box only has the KEP logo and "Stage 1 228mm VW/Porsche Presure Plate" printed on it

The Kennedy box says 228 - but the PP inside is a 225 - (a shipping room error somewhere...)

the 225 PP does not match up to the 228mm 930 FW/ring gear - just as said below


problem solved- see post below


.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
larryM
post Nov 1 2012, 11:26 PM
Post #2


emoze
***

Group: Members
Posts: 891
Joined: 1-January 03
From: mid- California
Member No.: 65
Region Association: Northern California




problem solved - see added edits in original post above


A. Kennedy says there are TWO PP differences:

1. the bolt holes issue (they elongate them (the say "notch") to solve this) and
2. the diaphragm fingers on the correct one for Porsche have no flats at the T/O brg (mine is this style)

B. There are also differences in the bolt-on adapter ring and starter ring gear

1. their early version was a one-piece adapter/gear - the PP was designed to be a very tight fit inside that ring, so there were no PP locating pins needed - that supplier went away

2. their current newer version is a 2-piece ring with a replacable ring gear; it uses locating pins for the PP, and the therefore the PP is not a tight fit in the ring - (price for this later type item is $170)

(fwiw - the Patrick conversion is not made the same way as the KEP)

the KEP "225" version without notched holes, and with flats on the fingers, is for VW Bus setup (914-4s etc may use this ?)

Kennedy is fixing this - notching the bolt holes on my PP - no charge - - hurrah !!!!

C. we discussed the "apparent oversize of the PP diameter - they say that it "should pull into position" with the bolts for a very tight interference fit - as described by other post - but maybe i'll have to chuck it on the lathe for trimming the OD if not

.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
larryM   3.2/901 conversion KEP Clutch & PP issue   Oct 27 2012, 01:33 PM
Krieger   I think I have that same kit on my 3.0 to 901. I ...   Oct 27 2012, 02:56 PM
Jeffs9146   When I installed my kit on the 3.0L it looked like...   Oct 27 2012, 03:09 PM
Steve   If you are using the stock 3.2 flywheel, you will ...   Oct 27 2012, 03:14 PM
SirAndy   If you are using the stock 3.2 flywheel, you will ...   Oct 27 2012, 04:56 PM
larryM   p.s. KEP says that they have no adapter or conve...   Nov 1 2012, 11:31 PM
Mark Henry   My bet is you are you trying to put a kit designed...   Oct 27 2012, 06:26 PM
Mark Henry   This is the adapter I'm making for my 3.0 conv...   Oct 27 2012, 06:49 PM
larryM   so far, the big news here is that there was a 225 ...   Oct 27 2012, 09:08 PM
Mark Henry   so far, the big news here is that there was a 225...   Oct 27 2012, 10:47 PM
larryM   WOW - you nailed it I just found the GPR invoice...   Oct 28 2012, 01:09 PM
Mark Henry   WOW - you nailed it I just found the GPR invoic...   Oct 28 2012, 02:32 PM
larryM   I DO NOT have a 245mm g50 FW - I have a new 930...   Oct 28 2012, 08:48 PM
Steve   That ring bolts to the flywheel through the recess...   Oct 27 2012, 09:26 PM
rfuerst911sc   I'm using a KEP Stage II on my 914 GT clone wi...   Oct 28 2012, 03:36 AM
Krieger   You do not need the gear ring on the 3.2 flywheel....   Oct 28 2012, 09:53 AM
larryM   I do NOT use a 3.2 oem FW - the entire package is ...   Oct 28 2012, 01:06 PM
SirAndy   I do NOT use a 3.2 oem FW Aha. I am using a stock ...   Oct 28 2012, 01:12 PM
Mark Henry   You do not need the gear ring on the 3.2 flywheel...   Oct 28 2012, 02:29 PM
patssle   However, you can get a brand new flywheel that has...   Oct 28 2012, 01:22 PM
larryM   re: Starter ring gear - teeth location fwiw - t...   Oct 29 2012, 01:31 PM
sixnotfour   I am interested in the G50 setup. i have an 87 car...   Oct 29 2012, 06:25 PM
larryM   problem solved - see added edits in original post ...   Nov 1 2012, 11:26 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd October 2025 - 04:52 AM
...