![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
stugray |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,825 Joined: 17-September 09 From: Longmont, CO Member No.: 10,819 Region Association: None ![]() |
I am adjusting the valve geometry while putting in a Raby 9700 cam and I am seeing .38 on the exhaust cam lift and .496 at the valve (an exh rocker ratio of 1.3) and I have a .39 on the intake with a .546 at the valve ( an int rocker ratio of 1.4) is this what everyone else gets for rocker ratios:
Intake rocker ratio = 1.4 Exhaust rocker ratio = 1.3 These are the 1.7 (1.8?) rockers that accept the 911 swivel feet. I am using the swivel feet, have modified the rocker faces, adjustable push rod, and zero lash to do the meaurements. Do those rocker ratios look like stock? I want to take 50 thousandths off the Combustion chambers to increase the CR, but my measurements say I wont have enough clearance on the Intake valve once I shave off 50 thousandths. I only have ~0.075 clearance now from the piston to the Int valve as it is with a deck of 0.030 and everything else (crank & rods) stock - flat top 96mm pistons. That Intake valve travel of ~0.55 looks huge to me. Anyone else care to comment? Stu |
![]() ![]() |
stugray |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,825 Joined: 17-September 09 From: Longmont, CO Member No.: 10,819 Region Association: None ![]() |
Chris,
That's right. I need to remeasure the cam lift now that I have full spring tension on the lifters. I'll do that today. Stu |
worn |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Winner of the Utah Twisted Joint Award ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,489 Joined: 3-June 11 From: Madison, WI Member No.: 13,152 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() ![]() |
Chris, That's right. I need to remeasure the cam lift now that I have full spring tension on the lifters. I'll do that today. Stu I have followed this with interest, for a while now. It seems like you can safely draw a few conclusions. 1. The rockers are what they are. 2. The valve lift is the goal, and apparently for you, it is too high. 3. The cam causes the valve lift. So, with all of that in mind, I respectfully submit that the cam you have may not be able to produce the goals you have set. Your diagram about changing the height of the rocker pedestals isn't going to cure this. For one thing, while you showed the arm length changing on the push rod side, you didn't take into account the change in moment arm on the valve side, so the impact on ratio is not as big as you think. It may be that the cam is designed for people who want a great deal more lift than you or most people want to run. Good luck - My next project is (IMG:style_emoticons/default/w00t.gif) cutting push rods to length . |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th July 2025 - 04:58 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |