![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
76-914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,737 Joined: 23-January 09 From: Temecula, CA Member No.: 9,964 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
I want to stiffen the trailing arms by adding the 1" tubes as outlined in another thread http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...p;#entry1831183 . Erc had some good info on this as did Andy (socalandy). This is my question. Should the tube wall be the same gauge as the trailing arm material? Andy stated the the tube he used is .125 wall and I thought that was overkill but I am a self admitted dumb ass and what do I know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) Also, should the tube be chromoloy? The only .125 I have is mid steel sch. 40 and thought I'd better ask those in the know, first. TIA, kent
|
![]() ![]() |
76-914 |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,737 Joined: 23-January 09 From: Temecula, CA Member No.: 9,964 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
Skipping any structural issues as I am sure others have more insight than I do. But it is always best to put the same types of steel together. I don't think the arm is chromoly so I think the mild steel might be the better as it will have similar expansion and contraction properties as the arm. But I don't know if the way that loads are carried through the makes a certain wall thickness a requirement but it would seem appropriate to try to match what was there and not go into overkill mode unless there is a clear benefit. God point on similar metals. I would think the tube would be somewhat larger and that the shear strength of the tube would have to = the tensil strength of the metal on the trailing arms. If this is confusing I can re-explain it and confuse you again. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) I want to stiffen the trailing arms by adding the 1" tubes as outlined in another thread http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...p;#entry1831183 . Erc had some good info on this as did Andy (socalandy). This is my question. Should the tube wall be the same gauge as the trailing arm material? Andy stated the the tube he used is .125 wall and I thought that was overkill but I am a self admitted dumb ass and what do I know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) Also, should the tube be chromoloy? The only .125 I have is mid steel sch. 40 and thought I'd better ask those in the know, first. TIA, kent Are you going to reinforce you suspension mounting ears? Are you going racing or autocrossing with the car? remember the trailing arms are designed to bend on impact and absorb energy, once they are stronger the energy will be transferred to the car body. No. No racing or autoX. I'm not saying the car won't develop a taste for an occasional rice rocket. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif) I've done the Engman kit going the suby 6 route. I'm keeping it narrow/4 lug/ 1 mirrored sleeper. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th July 2025 - 04:36 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |