Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 901 Tranny differences?
boxsterfan
post Jun 30 2004, 04:10 PM
Post #1


914's are kewl
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,776
Joined: 6-June 03
From: San Ramon, CA
Member No.: 791
Region Association: Northern California



Is there some data out there on the 901 tranny differences between the years it was manuafactured?

Do all 901's have the same shift pattern?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
lapuwali
post Jun 30 2004, 05:30 PM
Post #2


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



You don't really have to change the gears, you just don't use first and drive it like it's a four-speed. First is the weakest (forward) gear in the 'box, as it's only supported at one end. With the torque provided by most Sixes (at least the 2.4s and up), first is unnecessary, anyway. You can spin the tires in second with a 2.4. With a 3.2, I'd bet you could start up a steep hill in third w/o slipping the clutch.

The V8 guys often put in taller gearing simply because the V8 makes so much torque at such low revs, there's little reason to spin it as high as the stock gearing will do.

The 2.0 Sixes only had slightly different gearing, and I believe it was actually even shorter than the /4 gearing. That engine really likes to rev.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 06:32 PM