901 Tranny differences? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
901 Tranny differences? |
boxsterfan |
Jun 30 2004, 04:10 PM
Post
#1
|
914's are kewl Group: Members Posts: 1,776 Joined: 6-June 03 From: San Ramon, CA Member No.: 791 Region Association: Northern California |
Is there some data out there on the 901 tranny differences between the years it was manuafactured?
Do all 901's have the same shift pattern? |
lapuwali |
Jun 30 2004, 05:30 PM
Post
#2
|
Not another one! Group: Benefactors Posts: 4,526 Joined: 1-March 04 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 1,743 |
You don't really have to change the gears, you just don't use first and drive it like it's a four-speed. First is the weakest (forward) gear in the 'box, as it's only supported at one end. With the torque provided by most Sixes (at least the 2.4s and up), first is unnecessary, anyway. You can spin the tires in second with a 2.4. With a 3.2, I'd bet you could start up a steep hill in third w/o slipping the clutch.
The V8 guys often put in taller gearing simply because the V8 makes so much torque at such low revs, there's little reason to spin it as high as the stock gearing will do. The 2.0 Sixes only had slightly different gearing, and I believe it was actually even shorter than the /4 gearing. That engine really likes to rev. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 06:32 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |