Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914-6 factory air cleaner - vs - K&N's, Which unit performs best
david63
post Aug 21 2013, 08:36 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 9-August 09
From: Parker Colorado
Member No.: 10,653
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Currently have a factory 914-6 air cleaner on the 3.0 in my 74 conversion. Question for the group is which system breathes better, the factory system or the K&N filters? I like the look of the two filters with the watershields but if the factoy system is better performance wise I guess I should stick with it? Please advise.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Cap'n Krusty
post Aug 22 2013, 12:16 AM
Post #2


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



Having measured the actual filter area on a number of K&N elements and compared them to the filter area of the stock paper elements, I can honestly tell you there is an ENORMOUS difference in the filter area, measured in square inches. Here are a few pix. (Both filters shown fit the same application.):

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Note the obvious differences here. Were you to remove the border material and flatten out the pleats, you might be REALLY surprised just how big the difference is. (In some applications, there may be as much as 5-10 times more filter area in the stock paper filter element!) If there is less media, and the unit flows more air, it is obvious the air passages (pores in the material) must be much larger. That being the case, K&N (and others) have to use oil on the filter media. The air passing through the larger holes deposits SOME of the contaminants on the oil surrounding the holes. However, a significantly larger amount of contaminants are allowed to enter the intake airstream and go into the engine, vs. the OE paper filter element. The quantity of oil applied to the filter element is fairly critical, especially on cars which use electronic mass airflow sensors. The oil destroys the MAF in pretty short order. That expensive air filter seems like chump change when you have to buy a new MAF as well as a stock air filter, and have the car scanned and the CEL reset.

A few years ago I read an article written by an engineer with a mining company in one of the northern mining states. His company invested in K&Ns for their giant off road dump trucks. His conclusion was that the cost of complete overhauls made necessary by their use dwarfed any possible savings and convenience they could have EVER realized from the use of those filters. Save a few hundred bucks per truck per year, and spend tens of thousands, again per truck, on engine work, per year.

It's your car, and my opinion, albeit somewhat substantiated. Your choice.

The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
david63   914-6 factory air cleaner - vs - K&N's   Aug 21 2013, 08:36 PM
Steve   There have been tons of tests done and the K&N...   Aug 21 2013, 08:45 PM
shoguneagle   I take it you are running Webers with rain shields...   Aug 21 2013, 08:50 PM
david63   The original air cleaner is really large and uses ...   Aug 21 2013, 08:57 PM
mskala   The original air cleaner is really large and uses...   Aug 21 2013, 09:12 PM
396   Can you please provide the mfg and number to thi...   Aug 22 2013, 07:30 AM
R8CERX   An insider trick that most of you will gain 15 or ...   Aug 21 2013, 09:10 PM
brant   Everyone with their 3.2 sound ought to drive my 90...   Aug 21 2013, 09:13 PM
'73-914kid   I run both currently.. Over summer, and when schoo...   Aug 21 2013, 11:16 PM
Cap'n Krusty   Having measured the actual filter area on a number...   Aug 22 2013, 12:16 AM
Maltese Falcon   K+N is also washable + re-useable, which is also c...   Aug 22 2013, 01:00 AM
Cap'n Krusty   K+N is also washable + re-useable, which is also ...   Aug 22 2013, 08:58 AM
mskala   I'll skip the argument of the k&n problems...   Aug 22 2013, 10:51 AM
JmuRiz   Britain Smith did a test with a stock-ish airbox (...   Aug 22 2013, 07:34 AM
jhora   david63... let me know if you want to go to the K...   Aug 22 2013, 02:08 PM
scotty b   the K&N sticker also adds weight to your car.....   Aug 22 2013, 05:13 PM
rgalla9146   the K&N sticker also adds weight to your car....   Aug 22 2013, 06:07 PM
Eric_Shea   :agree: I have no words. El Capitano has spoken.   Aug 22 2013, 07:19 PM
Mark Henry   On my type one 2007cc Gene Berg engine that I buil...   Aug 22 2013, 07:41 PM
rhodyguy   when the k&n filters are no longer reddish pin...   Aug 23 2013, 06:47 AM
monkeyboy   Actually, the K&N's filter better when dir...   Aug 23 2013, 07:50 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 07:28 AM