![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Matt Romanowski |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 ![]() |
For the folks who are rebuilding their own transmissions, what are you using for a backlash measurement? The manual says around .007, but that seems a little tight. We're trying to get some temperature out of the transmission and were thinking about running a little looser. Anyone tried that?
|
![]() ![]() |
Dr Evil |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Send me your transmission! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 23,041 Joined: 21-November 03 From: Loveland, OH 45140 Member No.: 1,372 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() ![]() |
I disagree. When it comes to the 901 pinion, more teeth takes away from the overall girth of the pinion base with smaller/thinner teeth. They would definitely put this in a box that was not intended to handle crazy tq. These weaknesses become evident when high tq is passed through a box not built for it. When keeping in with parameters speced for the boxes, the number of teeth is not an issue.
Your mention of the change made to gain an extra tooth on the 915 supports what I am saying. Increased size was mandatory and that box handles more tq/hp than a 901. All parts are thicker in that one. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st August 2025 - 02:02 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |