Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Anyone ever bought from "German Auto-SACO"?, Should I trust 'em
SGB
post Jul 27 2004, 03:28 PM
Post #1


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



I was looking for info on dual springs for my valves, as well as seats for smaller stem diameter the SS valves use. I came accross this place. These look really interesting. Dual vlve spring, SS. I don't know price yet. I guess they are rebuilds. Anybody familiar with this outfit? I am really interested in SS valves anyway, and dual springs. Et voila, here they both are, with guides no less.
Hmmmmm.....

Type Four Head
German Auto Heads Feature Our Chromoly Seats, Silicone Bronze Guides, Heat Treated Keepers, Chromoly Retainers And Chromevanadium Valve Springs. All The Heads Feature Stainless Steel Valves.
21-0426 Type IV 48 x 38 Dual Spring (each)
071-101-061D Stock W/F-Ports (each)


SACO page with type 4 heads

I posted this question at Pelican and havent recieved any response. Maybe I need to find a bug forum?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Jake Raby
post Jul 27 2004, 04:37 PM
Post #2


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



The charge developed by the 48mm valve (and huge port that normally still isn't 48mm)fills the cylinder to the point that the 38mm exhaust valve, nor the exhaust port can operate at 75%-80%...

We have seen this so many times on the flowbench and in engines... My 2600cc engines get no larger than a 44mm intake, and hardly any intake port enlargement, just some shape work.

The 48x38 valves actually hurt the engine. Using a 48x38 valve arrangement I have seen flow numbers through the intake at 225 CFM, while the best exhaust port work would only flow 140 CFM..

More intake charge requires more exhaust charge! If you get less than 75% out of the exhaust of what enters the intake you are losing power... Consistently a smaller intake valve and port has made us more power. Thats why my 2270 C makes more power with 44x36 valves with a split duration cam than a 2600cc engine from another reputable shop that swears by 48x38 and straight pattern cam.

Bigger is NOT better.... Hell my 3.0 only has a 52mm intake valve.... Wait till you see the numbers from those heads! on the first try we got 76% of the intake out of the exhaust!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 02:42 AM