 Re-tiring my '74, 165/80 15 |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| flipb |
 Jan 21 2014, 10:44 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Members Posts: 1,809 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Fairfax, VA Member No.: 10,752 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region 
 |
Far from retiring it, I'm getting to drive my '74 2.0 a lot more lately. Engine is freshly built 2056; Evil-rebuilt trans.
The car came to me with Kumho 165/80 R15 tires -- OEM size, if I'm not mistaken. They're fine and have at least half their tread left, but I noticed a date code of 3003 -- I believe that translates to a date of manufacture of the 30th week of 2003. Primarily out of fear for what a catastrophic blowout could do to the car, I'm thinking it's time to replace them. I'm leaning heavily toward keeping the OEM size. I love the go-kart feeling and I can pretty easily control the rear end with the torque of the 2056 and those skinny tires. It's strictly a fun road car... no racing ambition. And it's not a CW car, but I like showing the OEM tire size for Cars & Coffee. I've come across 4 tires available in 165/80 R15. I'm interested in hearing from anyone who has experience with these or has a compelling reason for me to consider something else (e.g. fatter tires).
So... anyone with experience/opinions? |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| JFJ914 |
Jan 21 2014, 10:48 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Benefactors Posts: 813 Joined: 13-June 03 From: Alpharetta, GA Member No.: 814 Region Association: South East States 
|
195-65x15 is the modern equivalent. Wider, lower, more availability.
|
 |
|
| 69telecaster |
Jan 21 2014, 12:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 4-April 10 From: White Cloud, MI Member No.: 11,558 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(John Jentz @ Jan 21 2014, 11:48 AM)  195-65x15 is the modern equivalent. Wider, lower, more availability. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) 195/65R15 has the same od so your speedometer reads properly. Probably don't want any wider on the skinny stock rims, but they fit under the car nicely. I've heard of 205's fitting, but don't know if that's on stock rims. I put Dunlops on the '76, and they look like they belong there. cm |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
flipb Re-tiring my '74 Jan 21 2014, 10:44 AM
flipb What's the absolute minimum at which fitment/r... Jan 21 2014, 11:45 AM boxsterfan I have 205/60/15 from Toyo on my 2.0L Fuch's. ... Jan 21 2014, 01:19 PM stugray If you intend to drive it at all in weather, I wou... Jan 21 2014, 01:43 PM johnhora Flip....
If going classic look, ride, and fit the ... Jan 21 2014, 03:12 PM euro911 I like a little more patch on the ground with the ... Jan 21 2014, 04:28 PM saigon71 I was in exactly the same position last year. The... Jan 21 2014, 04:51 PM flipb Still considering the OEM size, and found another ... Jan 21 2014, 08:45 PM
dlkawashima
Still considering the OEM size, and found another... Jan 22 2014, 07:50 PM siverson I agree with you. For low HP cars (i.e. < 120 H... Jan 21 2014, 08:52 PM maf914 Flip, I just received the March 2014 issue of Clas... Jan 24 2014, 04:40 PM flipb
Flip, I just received the March 2014 issue of Cla... Jan 25 2014, 02:17 PM euro911 Michelin is making 165SR15 XZX tires again?
:pop... Jan 25 2014, 01:50 AM 1972 914 2.0 I decided to go with Bridgestone Eagle GT 195/60/1... Jan 25 2014, 08:37 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 12:06 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.