Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> fuel delivery differences (HP)
RonnieJ
post Feb 2 2014, 11:30 AM
Post #1


RonnieJ
**

Group: Members
Posts: 230
Joined: 16-June 03
From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
Member No.: 829
Region Association: Upper MidWest



What will a stock 1.7 produce in H.P.with the following.

Progressive 32/36

Weber 40's

D-Jet F.I.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
McMark
post Feb 2 2014, 01:30 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Gasoline combustion is based on a critical mixture of oxygen and fuel. Too far in either direction (rich/lean) will drop off power. If you do the math, it's 14.7 parts air to 1 part fuel. But since engines aren't math problems, often WOT power pulls perform better around 12:1 or more. But in those cases it's technically incorrect to say that more fuel is making more power. More fuel is overcoming the inadequacy/irregularity of the intake and fuel delivery systems.

The real answer is one of those frustratingly vague responses. Peak horsepower is created with just enough fuel. No more. No less.

A progressive single carb gives you one fuel adjustment for the whole motor. So it's wrong most of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A dual carb setup give you one fuel adjustment per cylinder. So it's a little more right, more of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A D-Jet fuel setup is even more right, even more of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A modern, dyne tuned, digital fuel injection system with lots of fuel map resolution is going to be even more right. Kind of like this...
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Feb 2 2014, 02:10 PM
Post #3


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



QUOTE(McMark @ Feb 2 2014, 11:30 AM) *

Gasoline combustion is based on a critical mixture of oxygen and fuel. Too far in either direction (rich/lean) will drop off power. If you do the math, it's 14.7 parts air to 1 part fuel. But since engines aren't math problems, often WOT power pulls perform better around 12:1 or more. But in those cases it's technically incorrect to say that more fuel is making more power. More fuel is overcoming the inadequacy/irregularity of the intake and fuel delivery systems.

The real answer is one of those frustratingly vague responses. Peak horsepower is created with just enough fuel. No more. No less.

A progressive single carb gives you one fuel adjustment for the whole motor. So it's wrong most of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A dual carb setup give you one fuel adjustment per cylinder. So it's a little more right, more of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A D-Jet fuel setup is even more right, even more of the time. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

A modern, dyne tuned, digital fuel injection system with lots of fuel map resolution is going to be even more right. Kind of like this...
Attached Image

Great analogy! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 11:47 AM